India wants Kashmir attackers brought to justice, Jaishankar tells US
Rubio expressed support to India in its efforts against extremism and urged Pakistan to cooperate in the investigation into the attack that killed 26 people, according to the US State Department.
Jaishankar said in a post on X that he told Rubio the 'perpetrators, backers and planners' of the April 22 attack 'must be brought to justice'.
Vivek Mishra works as an Assistant Editor with Eastern Eye and has over 13 years of experience in journalism. His areas of interest include politics, international affairs, current events, and sports. With a background in newsroom operations and editorial planning, he has reported and edited stories on major national and global developments.
INDIA's foreign minister S Jaishankar has told US secretary of state Marco Rubio that those behind last week's attack in Kashmir must be brought to justice. The comments came as the United States called for de-escalation of tensions between India and Pakistan.
The US said Rubio spoke to leaders of both countries in separate calls on Wednesday and encouraged them to work together to reduce tensions.
Rubio expressed support to India in its efforts against extremism and urged Pakistan to cooperate in the investigation into the attack that killed 26 people, according to the US State Department.
Jaishankar said in a post on X that he told Rubio the “perpetrators, backers and planners” of the April 22 attack “must be brought to justice”.
Pakistan’s prime minister Shehbaz Sharif urged the US to press India to “dial down the rhetoric and act responsibly,” his office said in a statement.
Officials and survivors said the attackers, described by Indian authorities as Islamist assailants, targeted a meadow in Kashmir’s Pahalgam area that was crowded with tourists.
The assailants separated men, asked their names, and shot Hindus at close range. At least 26 people were killed, most of them tourists.
India has identified the three attackers, including two Pakistani nationals, as terrorists involved in a violent revolt in Kashmir.
Pakistan has denied any involvement and called for a neutral investigation.
Kashmir, which is majority Muslim, is claimed in full by both India and Pakistan, though each controls only part of the region.
India and Pakistan have fought two wars over Kashmir. India accuses Pakistan of supporting and funding an anti-government insurgency that began in 1989 and has since declined.
Pakistan says it provides only diplomatic and moral support to the Kashmiri demand for self-determination.
Following the Pahalgam attack, India put a river water sharing treaty with Pakistan on hold. Both countries have also shut their airspace to each other's airlines.
For the past seven nights, troops from both sides have exchanged small arms fire across the border, but India has said there have been no casualties.
The United Nations has urged both countries to avoid confrontation. China also called for restraint earlier this week.
The head of the Pakistan-administered part of Kashmir called for international mediation and said his administration was preparing a humanitarian response in case of escalation.
India’s navy has issued warnings for several firing drills in the Arabian Sea off the coasts of Maharashtra and Gujarat. Gujarat borders Pakistan. The navy has not commented on the warnings.
Earlier this week, Indian prime miinister Narendra Modi told his military chiefs they had the freedom to decide the country’s response to the Pahalgam attack, according to a government source.
Pakistan has said it believes Indian military action is imminent.
India closes airspace to Pakistan
India shut its airspace to Pakistani aircraft on Wednesday, responding to Islamabad’s earlier move banning Indian planes from flying over its territory.
The tit-for-tat measures come as tensions rise between the nuclear-armed neighbours.
Pakistan closed its airspace to Indian aircraft on April 24. India’s ban, which includes military flights, will last until May 23, according to a government notice.
The notice to air operators said that Indian airspace was not available for Pakistani registered or leased aircraft -- "including military flights".
THE BANK OF ENGLAND on Thursday reduced its key interest rate by 0.25 percentage points to 4 per cent, the lowest level in two and a half years, as it looked to support the UK economy amid continued concerns over US tariffs.
The central bank also forecast that the British economy would grow by 1.25 per cent this year, a slight improvement from its earlier estimate of 1 per cent.
"The direct impact of US tariffs is milder than feared but more general tariff-related uncertainty still weighs on sentiment," the BoE said in a statement.
In May, London and Washington reached an agreement to cut tariffs of more than 10 per cent imposed by US president Donald Trump on certain UK-made products imported by the US, especially vehicles.
Thursday’s rate reduction marked the BoE’s fifth cut since it began a rate-trimming cycle in August 2024.
"Interest rates are still on a downward path, but any future rate cuts will need to be made gradually and carefully," said BoE governor Andrew Bailey.
The BoE’s primary objective is to maintain the UK’s annual inflation rate at 2.0 per cent. However, the most recent data showed inflation had risen to an 18-month high in June.
The Consumer Prices Index climbed to 3.6 per cent, with motor fuel and food prices remaining elevated.
Weak economy
Official data showed the UK economy contracted for a second consecutive month in May, and unemployment reached a near four-year high of 4.7 per cent.
The contraction has been attributed in part to prime minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government raising UK business taxes from April. That same month, the country became subject to Trump’s 10 per cent baseline tariff on most goods.
Finance minister Rachel Reeves welcomed the BoE’s decision.
"This fifth interest rate cut since the election (win by Labour in July 2024) is welcome news, helping bring down the cost of mortgages and loans for families and businesses," she said in a statement.
Last week, the US Federal Reserve held interest rates steady, resisting political pressure from Trump to lower borrowing costs to stimulate the US economy.
Asked about tariffs, Fed chair Jerome Powell said at a press conference, "We're still a ways away from seeing where things settle down."
The European Central Bank is expected to keep interest rates unchanged at its next meeting, as eurozone inflation remains close to its two per cent target. However, economists have noted this could change depending on the impact of Trump’s tariffs on the euro area.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Commuters cross London Bridge on October 15, 2024. (Photo: Getty Images)
UK's main minimum wage rate is expected to rise by 4.1 per cent next year to £12.71 an hour to stay aligned with the government's goal of matching two-thirds of median earnings, the Low Pay Commission said on Tuesday.
The minimum wage in Britain has seen sharp increases in recent years. It rose by 6.7 per cent in April to £12.21 an hour. OECD data showed it was the second-highest in Europe in relative terms last year, behind France.
The Bank of England considers rising wage costs across the economy as one of the reasons for the UK's higher inflation compared to other European countries. However, it expects this pressure to ease as the labour market slows.
The government sets the minimum wage each year based on recommendations from the Low Pay Commission, which includes members representing employers, trade unions and academia.
Around 6.5 per cent of UK workers earn the minimum wage, and many others earn slightly more.
A hospitality trade body said increased employment costs had already led to reduced staff hours.
"Any significant wage hike may cost jobs. We urge the Low Pay Commission to recognise these cost pressures and recommend a more gradual and sustainable increase this year," said UKHospitality chair Kate Nicholls.
Earlier on Tuesday, the government issued guidance to the commission outlining the factors it should consider. These remain largely unchanged from 2024 and include keeping the minimum wage at no less than two-thirds of the median while considering employment and economic competitiveness.
In May, the commission had forecast a 3.6 per cent rise in the minimum wage for employees aged 21 and over, which is known as the National Living Wage.
The commission said Tuesday’s higher estimate reflected stronger average wage growth over the past three months and expectations for higher growth in the coming year. The final rate could fall between £12.55 and £12.86 an hour.
"Our recommendations are not purely formulaic and we are required to take economic conditions into account, so these figures should be taken as indicative only," it said.
The estimate is based on a forecast that annual average wage growth will slow from 5.1 per cent in May 2025 to 3.9 per cent by the end of the year, and to 3 per cent by the end of 2026.
The government has also asked the commission to continue working towards removing the lower minimum wage of £10 an hour for 18- to 20-year-olds, without affecting employment in that age group.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Demonstrators from Stand Up To Racism challenge a far-right march calling for mass deportations in Manchester last Saturday (2)
SIX days of violent rage last summer finally ended after a call for a racist pogrom where nobody came. That week showed how much small groups of people could shift national narratives.
The violence which flashed across thirty locations saw fewer than 5,000 rioters nationwide. Hundreds came out for clean-up campaigns, sending a different message about what their towns stood for.
The online list hoping to incite violence targeting forty migration centres and law firms was a violent fantasy – yet the fear and panic it generated were real. Around 15,000 people went out to show practical solidarity. But millions more were glad that they did. For one day, the front-pages of the right-wing Daily Mail – “The Night Anti-Hate Marchers Faced Down the Thugs” – and the left-wing Daily Mirror were hard to tell apart.
That brief outbreak of unity feels like a distant memory now. Asylum dominates politics again. The police must contain those seeking to intimidate asylum seekers by facilitating only lawful protests. The anniversary of the counter-protests is marked too by a “Welcome Weekend” to ensure those who support refugees can make their voices heard too.
British Asian views of asylum are not so different from those of the white British. The balance of pretty sympathetic, more sceptical and downright xenophobic views shifts dramatically by age, education and political perspective among Asians as it does among the broader public too. Those who see their own families reflecting the positive contribution of migration to British society can find that a distinction between legal and illegal immigration resonates. Black British views tend to be more sympathetic to asylum seekers. Sharper scepticism about the Home Office was reinforced again by the Windrush scandal.
A wide range of views about immigration numbers, its pressures and gains, and how to make integration work can be found across minority and majority groups. One useful litmus test of a legitimate argument about immigration is whether it can appeal across white, black and Asian Britons – or only speaks to one group.
Politicians constantly emphasise that they recognise ‘legitimate concerns’ about immigration – but a crucial half of the argument has gone missing this summer. Any meaningful description of which arguments and debates are legitimate in a democracy depends on rejecting arguments rooted in violence, xenophobia and racial prejudice. But how often, when a politician talks about recognising legitimate concerns in 2025, is anything said about what needs to be excluded as illegitimate too?
This anniversary of the counter-protests should be a chance to rebalance the argument. It is time to ensure that the legitimate concerns of ethnic minorities in Britain – about a concerted effort to dissolve foundational social norms against racism, and to deny our status as equal citizens – are heard too There is an attempt to mainstream the idea of ‘remigration’ – a far right code for kicking out all of the migrants and ethnic minorities too. The last three years have seen the de facto legalisation of racial abuse in online space. Elon Musk has turned Twitter/X into one of the most powerful amplifiers of racism we have ever seen. Government departments are reluctant to even review whether they should still use, as a key channel of public communication, a site which ethnic minorities can barely use without facing everyday racism from antisemites, racists and open Nazis.
New TV channels appear unwilling to draw a line between political debate and sweeping prejudice too. GB News platformed a guest essay to argue that anti-Muslim prejudice is rational not irrational - and since Islam does not “belong here”, anybody wishing to uphold that faith should leave Britain for a “Muslim country”.
Rupert Lowe is campaigning for negative net migration. He confirmed that he now wants to deport “a large share of legal and settled migrants” so net migration is negative. Yet Opposition Leader Kemi Badenoch seems to lack the authority to prevent Tory MPs joining Lowe’s Restore Britain campaign for mass deportations.
Former soldier and TV celebrity Ant Middleton, who was part of Nigel Farage’s Reform delegation to Trump’s inauguration, now proposes banning people from public office until their ancestors have been here for four generations. He would not just make Sadiq Khan and Kemi Badenoch ineligible for office - but even their children too.
These absurd racist fantasies of disenfranchising or deporting Rishi Sunak, Kemi Badenoch and Sadiq Khan will fail but they toxify the experience of public life. British-born minorities do have some birthright, nativist privilege when racist troglodytes reveal their maximalist remigration agenda. It is a bigger challenge to protect asylum seekers from dehumanising rhetoric and action. Our leaders should be able to address the legitimate concerns of minority and majority groups at once. Only those seeking to pander to illegitimate xenophobic views too should fear that it is a zero-sum game. If politicians want to be trusted, they need to address the legitimate concerns of ethnic minorities about keeping racism out of British public life.
Sunder Katwala is the director of thinktank British Future and the author of the book How to Be a Patriot: The must-read book on British national identity and immigration.
Keep ReadingShow less
FILE PHOTO: Trump shakes hands with Modi during a joint press conference at Hyderabad House in New Delhi on February 25, 2020.
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump has ordered an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, taking the total duty to 50 per cent, in response to India’s continued import of Russian oil.
The move marks the most severe trade penalty India has faced from the us in years and signals rising tensions between the two strategic partners.
Trump signed the executive order on Wednesday (6), just hours before the initial 25 per cent tariff was set to take effect. The new levy will kick in after 21 days and will apply to nearly all Indian goods, barring a few exempt categories such as pharmaceuticals and electronics.
“The country directly or indirectly imported Russian oil,” Trump said in the order, which also warned of similar action against other countries seen as supporting Russia’s energy trade.
India has responded firmly to the US decision to impose additional tariffs, calling the move “unfair, unjustified and unreasonable.” The government said it had already made its position clear on issues related to oil imports from Russia and criticised Washington for targeting India’s energy trade in recent days. Describing the tariff hike as “unfortunate,” New Delhi stated it would take all necessary actions to protect its national interests.
The US administration sees oil revenues as a key source funding Russia’s war in Ukraine, and has warned of wider sanctions if Moscow does not move towards peace.
The latest tariff comes just as Indian prime minister Narendra Modi is set to visit China later this month for a major regional summit, in what many see as a sign of New Delhi diversifying its diplomatic partnerships amid growing strain with Washington.
The White House said the measure followed failed attempts to strike a trade deal with India and was part of broader pressure on allies of Russia. US special envoy Steve Witkoff was in Moscow this week, reportedly pushing for progress on a Ukraine peace deal.
India’s foreign ministry earlier called US pressure over its oil policy “unjustified and unreasonable,” and said it would continue to safeguard its national interests. India’s National Security Adviser was in Moscow on Wednesday, as tensions with the US escalated.
Meanwhile, economists across India warned that the higher tariffs would seriously harm Indian exports and impact economic growth in the coming year.
A Prasanna, chief economist at ICICI Securities Primary Dealership, said: “The additional tariffs will come into effect after 21 days but it will be on top of the earlier 25 per cent, so the total 50 per cent rate will be a big negative for Indian exports. However, some key segments like electronics and pharma continue to be exempt.”
“At a 50 per cent rate, many Indian exports will face a handicap versus countries that are in the 15-30 per cent bucket,” he added.
Sakshi Gupta, principal economist at HDFC Bank, said the economic impact could be significant if a trade deal is not reached soon.
“While Trump’s order gives another 21 days for a deal to breakthrough, in case it does not, we will have to significantly lower FY26 GDP growth forecast to below 6 per cent, baking in a 40–50 bps hit. This would be double our earlier estimates.”
Teresa John, lead economist at Nirmal Bank Institutional Equities, said India might consider reducing Russian imports gradually. “The pressure is mounting on India to come to a trade agreement. India may agree to significantly reduce Russian purchases over a phased manner and diversify to other sources.”
Gaura Sen Gupta of IDFC First Bank warned of lasting damage if the tariffs remain in place. “Post this order, bilateral tariffs will rise to 50 per cent, which would be the highest applied from August onwards. This definitely increases the downside risk to the 2025–26 GDP estimate.”
“If the tariffs persist till March 2026, the total downside risk is estimated at 0.3 per cent to 0.4 per cent,” she said.
As it stands, India is now grouped with Brazil as one of the few countries facing the steepest US tariffs, placing it at a clear disadvantage compared to regional rivals such as Vietnam and Bangladesh.
(Agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
FILE PHOTO: India's prime minister Narendra Modi meets Chinese president Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit, in Kazan. (ANI Photo)
INDIAN prime minister Narendra Modi will visit China for the first time in over seven years, a government source said on Wednesday (6), in a further sign of a diplomatic thaw with Beijing as tensions with the US rise.
Modi will go to China for a summit of the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organisation that begins on August 31, the government source, with direct knowledge of the matter, told Reuters. India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
His trip will come at a time when India's relationship with the US faces its most serious crisis in years after president Donald Trump imposed the highest tariffs among Asian peers on goods imported from India, and has threatened an unspecified further penalty for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil.
Modi's visit to the Chinese city of Tianjin for the summit of the SCO, a Eurasian political and security grouping that includes Russia, will be his first since June 2018. Subsequently, Sino-Indian ties deteriorated sharply after a military clash along their disputed Himalayan border in 2020.
Modi and Chinese president Xi Jinping held talks on the sidelines of a BRICS summit in Russia in October that led to a thaw. The giant Asian neighbours are now slowly defusing tensions that have hampered business relations and travel between the two countries.
Modi with Xi Jinping. (ANI Photo)
Trump has threatened to charge an additional 10 per cent tariff on imports from members - which include India - of the BRICS group of major emerging economies for "aligning themselves with Anti-American policies."
Trump said on Wednesday his administration would decide on the penalty for buying Russian oil after the outcome of US efforts to seek a last-minute breakthrough that would bring about a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine.
Trump's top diplomatic envoy Steve Witkoff is in Moscow, two days before the expiry of a deadline the president set for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or face new sanctions.
Meanwhile, India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval is in Russia on a scheduled visit and is expected to discuss India's purchases of Russian oil in the wake of Trump's pressure on India to stop buying Russian crude, according to another government source, who also did not want to be named.
Doval is likely to address India's defence cooperation with Russia, including obtaining faster access to pending exports to India of Moscow's S400 air defence system, and a possible visit by president Vladimir Putin to India.
Doval's trip will be followed by foreign minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in the weeks to come.
US and Indian officials said a mix of political misjudgement, missed signals and bitterness scuttled trade deal negotiations between the world's biggest and fifth-largest economies, whose bilateral trade is worth over $190 billion (£149bn).
India expects Trump's crackdown could cost it a competitive advantage in about $64 billion worth of goods sent to the US that account for 80 per cent of its total exports,four separate sources told Reuters, citing an internal government assessment.
However, the relatively low share of exports in India's $4 trillion economy is expectedto limit the direct impact on economic growth.
On Wednesday, the Reserve Bank of India left its GDP growth forecast for the current April-March financial year unchanged at 6.5 per cent and held rates steady despite the tariff uncertainties.
India's government assessment report has assumed a 10 per cent penalty for buying Russian oil, which would take the total US tariff to 35 per cent, the sources said.
India's trade ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The internal assessment report is the government's initial estimate and will change as the quantum of tariffs imposed by Trump becomes clear, all four sources said.
India exported goods estimated at around $81bn (£64bn) in 2024 to the US.