PRIME MINISTER Theresa May has apologised to leaders of the Caribbean on Tuesday (17) after it emerged her government had threatened to deport people who had immigrated to the UK almost 70 years ago.
After the outpouring of criticism concerning the treatment of the so-called Windrush
generation, May told representatives of the 12 Caribbean members of the Commonwealth that she took the treatment of the migrants “very seriously”.
“I want to apologise to you today because we are genuinely sorry for any anxiety that
has been caused,” the prime minister said. “I want to dispel any impression that my government is, in some sense, clamping down on Commonwealth citizens, particularly
those from the Caribbean.”
The generation were brought to the UK from the West Indies on the ship Empire Windrush between 1948 and the early 1970s.
They and their parents were invited to help rebuild Britain after the Second World War.
Under the 1971 Immigration Act, the Commonwealth citizens were given indefinite leave to remain in the country.
But the Home Office did not keep a record of those granted leave to remain or issue any paperwork confirming it, meaning it is difficult for the individuals to now prove they are in
Britain legally.
Almost half a million people left their homes in the West Indies to live in Britain between 1948 and 1970, according to Britain’s National Archives.
But those who failed to get their papers in order are now being treated as illegal, which
limits their access to work and healthcare and puts them at risk of deportation if they
cannot prove they are residents in the UK.
Recent reports in the British media have included cases such as a man who was denied
treatment for cancer and a special needs teaching assistant who lost his job after being
accused of being illegal immigrants despite living in the UK for more than 40 years.
May’s remarks came after her successor at the Home Office, Amber Rudd, apologised
in the Commons on Monday (16).
“Frankly, some of the way they have been treated has been wrong, has been appalling,
and I am sorry,” Rudd told parliament.
She also announced that the Home Office had set up a new unit to deal with people’s
concerns about their immigration status. “I hope it will go a long way to assist the Commonwealth citizens who should have their rights confirmed without charge,” she said.
An official spokesman for May said: “Work has been going on for some time now in
creating a system to handle those claims. We’re confident that we will be able to do it
in a smooth and efficient way.”
At an emergency meeting in the Commons on Monday, MPs questioned how the situation would be resolved. Tottenham MP David Lammy referred to the controversy as a day of “national shame”.
“When my parents and their generation arrived in this country under the Nationality Act of 1948, they arrived here as British citizens,” he said. “…This is a day of national shame and it has come about because of a hostile environment policy that was begun under her prime minister.”
Lammy has asked any individual who has had trouble with their status to contact him.
One 35-year-old man, who was due to be deported on Wednesday (18), was stopped after the Labour MP intervened.
The politician confirmed that the mother of Mozi Haynes got in touch, saying he was due to be removed from the country after two failed applications to stay.
Britain has written to each of the Caribbean governments setting out how it intends to rectify the situation, notably by helping anyone affected to find the necessary paperwork
to regularise their immigration status.
It has promised to waive the usual fee for residency cards, and “reimburse reasonable
legal costs” incurred so far.
But there was further embarrassment for May on Tuesday when the Home Office – which she led for six years before moving to Downing Street – admitted it had destroyed some of the Windrush generation’s registration slips, which document when they arrived in Britain.
Antigua and Barbuda prime minister Gaston Browne said he was pleased the government
had made moves to address the issue.
“Many of these individuals do not have any connection with the country of their birth, would have lived in the UK their entire lives and worked very hard towards the advancement of the UK,” Browne said.
The issue came to light following a clampdown on illegal immigration spearheaded by May during her tenure as interior minister.
It required people to have documentation to work, rent a property or access benefits
including healthcare.
“Due to the rollout of very intrusive and harsh immigration checks across everyday life, people are now finding themselves in situations where they are quite heavily penalised for not having that documentation," said Satbir Singh, chief executive of the Joint Council for Welfare of Immigrants.
Singh said those affected could suffer from anxiety and depression as they can be left destitute after losing work after being labelled undocumented migrants.
UK music industry continue to face systemic barriers that hinder progress, visibility, and career growth – despite decades of contribution and cultural influence, a new report has revealed.
The study, South Asian Soundcheck, published last Tuesday (7), surveyed 349 artists and professionals and found that while many are skilled and ambitious, structural obstacles are still holding them back.
Prepared by Lila, a charity focused on empowering south Asian artists and music professionals, the survey showed that nearly three-quarters of respondents earn some income from music, but only 28 per cent rely on it full time.
More than half struggle to access opportunities or funding, and many said they lack industry networks or knowledge about contracts and rights.
Beyond structural issues, almost half said they face stereotypes about the kind of music they should make; two in five encounter family doubts about music as a career, and one in three has experienced racial discrimination.
Although 69 per cent said there was progress in visibility, but 68 per cent still feel invisible within the industry.
Respondents sought urgent action, including mentorship and networking opportunities, stronger south Asian representation in key industry roles and fairer access to funding.
Veteran musician and composer Viram Jasani, who chaired the Asian Music Circuit and led a national enquiry into south Asian music in 1985, told Eastern Eye the findings were “disheartening”.
“I read the report and my heart sank – it feels as though nothing has changed,” he said.
“Back in 1985, we had already identified the same problems and made clear recommendations for better representation, employment and long-term support. Four decades later, we are still talking about the same issues.”
Jasani, a sitar, tabla and tambura expert, said the report focused mainly on modern genres and overlooked traditional south Asian music, which he believes is central to cultural identity.
“Since colonial times, British attitudes have not changed much,” he said. “If they can erase Indian traditional culture and create a community that lives entirely within an English cultural bubble, then they will have succeeded.”
He added that young south Asian artists were often drawn to Western contemporary music, while neglecting their own heritage.
“We are brilliant in Western genres, but that should come after we are grounded in our traditional shashtriya sangeet (classical music),” he said. “Without that foundation, we lose our sense of identity.”
Jasani also warned a lack of unity within the south Asian community continues to weaken its cultural progress.
He said, “People compete with each other while the world watches. For too long, massaging egos has taken priority over producing the best of our culture.”
According to the survey, one in three has experienced direct racial discrimination. One respondent said, “There are virtually no visible and successful south Asian artists in the mainstream – people simply do not know where to place us.”
Another added: “I want south Asian artists to be part of the collective mainstream industry, not just put on south Asian-specific stages or events.”
While the visibility of south Asian artists has improved, with more names appearing on festival line-ups and in the media, the study revealed this progress remains “surface level”.
Lila’s founder, Vikram Gudi, said the findings show progress has not yet been translated into structural inclusion.
“The data exposes what we call the progress paradox. Seventy-three per cent of the people we surveyed earn some money from music, but only 27 per cent earn enough to rely on it as a sustainable career,” he said.
“The Soundcheck gives us the evidence to enact real change and identifies three essential needs – mentorship, representation, and investment.”
Three-quarters of participants said mentorship from experienced professionals would make the biggest difference to their careers. Many stressed the importance of being guided by people who “understand how the industry works and can connect them to decision-makers”.
Nearly the same proportion called for greater south Asian representation across the music industry – not just on stage, but within executive, programming and production roles at festivals, venues, record labels and streaming services.
Dedicated funding also emerged as a priority, with many describing the current grant systems as inaccessible or ill-suited to the diverse and cross-genre work that defines south Asian creativity today.
Two in five respondents reported that family or community resistance remains a challenge, often due to the perceived instability of a music career. The report argued this scepticism is “economically logical”, when there are so few visible south Asian success stories in the mainstream.
Responding to the report, Indy Vidyalankara, member of the UK Music Diversity Taskforce and BPI Equity & Justice Advisory Group, said: “South Asian music is rich, vibrant, and hugely influential. We need south Asian representation at every level of the ecosystem, plus support and investment to match that influence.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.