SEVEN years ago, Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s Padmaavat graced the silver screen, captivating audiences with its grand narrative and visual splendour. A historical drama rooted in legend, the film brought to life the tale of Rani Padmavati, a Rajput queen celebrated for her courage and sacrifice. Despite facing significant controversy and protests prior to its release, Padmaavat emerged as both a critical and commercial success, solidifying its status as a landmark in Indian cinema.
Padmaavat exemplified Bhansali's unique style, with extravagant sets, intricate costumes, and stunning cinematography that set new benchmarks for historical dramas. The film's grandeur was balanced with a hauntingly beautiful score that elevated the story to a whole new level. However, its cinematic brilliance also sparked debates concerning the balance between historical representation and artistic interpretation, further cementing its place in cinematic history.
The film's brilliance also stemmed from its outstanding performances. Deepika Padukone exuded beauty and strength as Rani Padmavati in one of her finest roles. Ranveer Singh delivered a career-defining performance as Alauddin Khilji, portraying the character's brutality and ambition. Shahid Kapoor, as Maharawal Ratan Singh, embodied dignity and quiet strength, while Jim Sarbh as Malik Kafur and Aditi Rao Hydari as Mehrunissa added depth and complexity to the narrative.
Experience the epic saga of Padmavati, a story of valor and beauty that transcends timeInstagram/bhansaliproductions
Beyond its opulent aesthetic, Padmaavat explores universal themes such as love, honour, sacrifice, and the complexities of human nature. These themes resonated with moviegoers across cultures, contributing to the film's global success. The depiction of Rani Padmavati's jauhar and the concept of self-sacrifice became some of the most debated aspects of the movie.
Padmaavat also sparked serious discussions about historical authenticity and creative licence, raising important questions regarding artistic freedom and filmmakers' responsibilities when portraying history. These debates extended beyond the film itself, prompting broader reflections on the relationship between art and cultural representation in Indian cinema.
As Padmaavat celebrates its seventh anniversary with a re-release on February 6, audiences have an opportunity to once again experience Bhansali's epic vision. The film's lasting impact lies not only in its artistic excellence but also in its ability to push boundaries, spark critical conversations, and leave an enduring mark on Indian cinema years after its release.
Rahul’s casual dismissal of that controversy has added fuel to the fire
Rahul Bhatt sparks controversy over 'insensitive' remarks about sisters Alia and Pooja Bhatt
Rahul Bhatt, fitness trainer and son of veteran filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt, has found himself at the centre of a social media storm following controversial remarks about his half-sister, Alia Bhatt. In a recent interview, Rahul drew comparisons between Alia and their older sister Pooja Bhatt, calling the latter more talented, attractive, and principled.
The comments, which many have labelled inappropriate and insensitive, have sparked widespread criticism online. During the interview, Rahul stated, “In my opinion, she (Alia) is not even half of what my real sister Pooja is. Not in talent, not in looks, not in terms of being sexy. In front of my sister, she is ‘paani kam chai’ (watery tea). Amongst the siblings, the most talented and the most moralistic is Pooja.”
Social media users reacted strongly, questioning why Rahul would compare his sisters in such personal terms. Several users were particularly disturbed by his reference to their appearance and sex appeal, pointing out that such comparisons within a family cross boundaries of propriety. One comment read, “This is disturbing. Why talk about your sisters like that? It’s not just weird, it’s wrong.” Another post said, “There’s nothing respectful about comparing your siblings’ attractiveness in public.”
The backlash also reignited conversation around a decades-old controversy involving Mahesh Bhatt and Pooja Bhatt. Rahul was asked about the infamous 1990s magazine cover where the father-daughter duo shared a kiss, which had stirred public outrage at the time. Dismissing the criticism, Rahul said, “It doesn’t make any difference. It’s like water off a duck’s back. We know the truth, and we’ve seen everything since childhood.”
Rahul’s casual dismissal of that controversy has added fuel to the fire, with critics saying it reflects a broader issue of the Bhatt family being insensitive to public perception and boundaries. Many users questioned the need for bringing up old incidents in a bid to defend new and equally questionable statements.
As of now, neither Alia Bhatt nor Pooja Bhatt has issued any public response to Rahul’s remarks. Both actors, known for their significant contributions to Indian cinema, have typically kept family matters private despite living in the public eye.
This episode has also sparked debate over the role of public figures in maintaining respect when discussing family matters in the media. Observers say such comments, especially when involving women’s appearance and personal qualities, reinforce problematic attitudes and fuel unnecessary controversies.
While Rahul Bhatt is not as prominent in the entertainment industry as his father or sisters, his comments have made headlines and placed the Bhatt family in the spotlight for reasons beyond their creative work. For many, this serves as a reminder that public platforms come with responsibility, and that family ties should not be trivialised or dissected for attention or comparison.
The backlash is unlikely to subside soon, especially as fans and followers of Alia and Pooja continue to express disappointment over the way the situation has unfolded. Whether or not Rahul chooses to clarify or apologise remains to be seen.