BBC ADAPTATION OF INDIAN NOVEL WILL FEATURE ONLY ASIAN CHARACTERS
by AMIT ROY
INDIAN AMERICAN filmmaker Mira Nair has spoken exclusively about how she is progressing with her adaptation of Vikram Seth’s 1,349-page novel, A Suitable Boy, for BBC 1.
Nair is certainly a busy woman. She is now locked away in a studio deep into editing the six-part TV series, which will be one of the BBC’s biggest drama projects for years. She is also choosing the cast – mainly in the UK – for a musical version of her 2001 hit film, Monsoon Wedding, which will be staged this summer at the Leeds Playhouse followed by the Roundhouse in London, The good news is that filming is complete.
Though the director is not enjoying the wet and cold weather in London after the sun and warmth and enjoyable anarchy of India, she did say: “I am looking happy, right? We have completed (editing) the first two episodes and now we are onto three, four, five and six. I heard it’s a summer 2020 release (in) July. But I don’t have a date.”
For 20 years after Seth’s novel was published in 1993, the consensus among drama commissioning editors was that British audiences were not yet ready for television that had only non-white characters.
Granada Television’s The Jewel in The Crown, adapted from Paul Scott’s Raj Quartet novels, was a huge success in 1984. However, it was not about India or Indians in India but about the life and loves of the British rulers in India as the curtains fell on the Raj.
In marked contrast, there are only Indian characters in A Suitable Boy, which is set four years after independence in 1947, as the country prepares for its first general election in 1951-1952.
As India finds its voice, so does Lata, a 19-year-old girl, whose widowed mother, Mrs Rupa Mehra, is obsessed with finding a suitable husband for her daughter, who is getting far too independent for her liking.
“So that’s very much the spine of our story,” observed Nair.
The script is by an Englishman, Andrew Davies, an acknowledged master of the craft, who has been helped by Seth and Nair.
“We all are working closely together to make sure that we get it right, we get the density of it, the politics and the story of a free India, how as a country comes to its own voice, a young woman, Lata, also finds her voice,” she said.
No one has counted the number of characters in Seth’s novel, but Nair directed a cast of “113”.
So what is it like to direct 113 actors and actresses, all but one recruited in India (so a voice coach was not needed to give them authentic Indian accents, which might have been the case had she relied on British Asian talent)?
“Oh, it’s absolutely yummy!” she beamed. “It really is. I love actors and the talent in our country is so powerful. What I love to do is find new people and match them opposite legendary people, so we have the great actress Tabu opposite two of three of Lata’s suitors, who have never faced a camera before.”
She reeled off a list of names of cast members who are well known in India: “We have extraordinary people like Manoj Pahwa, Vinay Pathak, Ram Kapoor, Rasika Duggal and Shahana Goswami, who all pitched up and did this with me.”
Three cast members from A Suitable Boy will be in Monsoon Wedding the musical. Namit Das, who plays Haresh in A Suitable Boy, is cast as PK Dubey in the musical. Gagan Dev Riar will make the switch from Pran to Lalit Verma, and Sharvari Deshpande, who plays Malati, Lata’s outgoing and opinionated best friend in A Suitable Boy, has been cast as Ria in the musical.
“So there is confluence between the film series and the musical – a number of actors are seen in both,” Nair said.
Filming in north India took five months – “and it was all done on location”.
“We filmed in Lucknow and Maheshwar and Kanpur,” Nair revealed.
An important part of the novel, involving the Chatterji family whose younger members speak to each other in rhyming slang, is set in Calcutta. It is known that Seth put something of himself into the character of Amit Chatterji.
Since Calcutta of the 1950s had largely disappeared, Nair recreated the city, including its most famous thoroughfare, Chowringhee, in Lucknow.
“We found an extraordinary art deco home in Lucknow and recreated it for Calcutta,” Nair said.
Is the story from 70 years ago relevant to modern India – and the world beyond? “It is very relevant, remarkably relevant,” she replied.
“Despite Partition, the very deep and layered co-existence of Hindus and Muslim communities was an ancient line of friendship. But that begins to get threatened in the beginning of our story in 1951, post-Partition. At the heart of it are two families – Hindu and Muslim – (who are) very closely knit. And (there is) a romance between a young Hindu girl, Lata, and her cricket star who happens to be Muslim, and how the wounds of Partition are really impossible to forget.”
Also “(the seeds of the dispute over) the Babri Masjid, the seeds of it – building a temple near a mosque – started happening in Vikram’s story in the ’50s. We are (now) also seeing the tensions that come from that. Which is uncannily prescient in terms of what is happening in India,” she said.
Rahul’s casual dismissal of that controversy has added fuel to the fire
Rahul Bhatt sparks controversy over 'insensitive' remarks about sisters Alia and Pooja Bhatt
Rahul Bhatt, fitness trainer and son of veteran filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt, has found himself at the centre of a social media storm following controversial remarks about his half-sister, Alia Bhatt. In a recent interview, Rahul drew comparisons between Alia and their older sister Pooja Bhatt, calling the latter more talented, attractive, and principled.
The comments, which many have labelled inappropriate and insensitive, have sparked widespread criticism online. During the interview, Rahul stated, “In my opinion, she (Alia) is not even half of what my real sister Pooja is. Not in talent, not in looks, not in terms of being sexy. In front of my sister, she is ‘paani kam chai’ (watery tea). Amongst the siblings, the most talented and the most moralistic is Pooja.”
Social media users reacted strongly, questioning why Rahul would compare his sisters in such personal terms. Several users were particularly disturbed by his reference to their appearance and sex appeal, pointing out that such comparisons within a family cross boundaries of propriety. One comment read, “This is disturbing. Why talk about your sisters like that? It’s not just weird, it’s wrong.” Another post said, “There’s nothing respectful about comparing your siblings’ attractiveness in public.”
The backlash also reignited conversation around a decades-old controversy involving Mahesh Bhatt and Pooja Bhatt. Rahul was asked about the infamous 1990s magazine cover where the father-daughter duo shared a kiss, which had stirred public outrage at the time. Dismissing the criticism, Rahul said, “It doesn’t make any difference. It’s like water off a duck’s back. We know the truth, and we’ve seen everything since childhood.”
Rahul’s casual dismissal of that controversy has added fuel to the fire, with critics saying it reflects a broader issue of the Bhatt family being insensitive to public perception and boundaries. Many users questioned the need for bringing up old incidents in a bid to defend new and equally questionable statements.
As of now, neither Alia Bhatt nor Pooja Bhatt has issued any public response to Rahul’s remarks. Both actors, known for their significant contributions to Indian cinema, have typically kept family matters private despite living in the public eye.
This episode has also sparked debate over the role of public figures in maintaining respect when discussing family matters in the media. Observers say such comments, especially when involving women’s appearance and personal qualities, reinforce problematic attitudes and fuel unnecessary controversies.
While Rahul Bhatt is not as prominent in the entertainment industry as his father or sisters, his comments have made headlines and placed the Bhatt family in the spotlight for reasons beyond their creative work. For many, this serves as a reminder that public platforms come with responsibility, and that family ties should not be trivialised or dissected for attention or comparison.
The backlash is unlikely to subside soon, especially as fans and followers of Alia and Pooja continue to express disappointment over the way the situation has unfolded. Whether or not Rahul chooses to clarify or apologise remains to be seen.