Trump announces 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports
"Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the world," Trump said.
Trump did not give details of the penalty he referred to for India’s trade with Russia. (Photo: Getty Images)
Vivek Mishra works as an Assistant Editor with Eastern Eye and has over 13 years of experience in journalism. His areas of interest include politics, international affairs, current events, and sports. With a background in newsroom operations and editorial planning, he has reported and edited stories on major national and global developments.
Trump links India’s high tariffs and trade barriers to new punitive measures.
He warned of an unspecified “penalty” over India’s defence and energy ties with Russia.
Trade talks between the US and India have stalled over market access disagreements.
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that imports from India will face a 25 per cent tariff. He also mentioned an unspecified "penalty" for New Delhi’s purchases of Russian weapons and energy.
The new tariffs will take effect on Friday, Trump posted on his Truth Social platform.
"Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the world, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers of any country," Trump said.
Trump cites trade deficit
In another post, Trump wrote in all caps that the United States has a "massive" trade deficit with India.
He said India has "always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE."
Trump did not give details of the penalty he referred to for India’s trade with Russia.
Measures linked to Russia-Ukraine conflict
The announcement comes as the 79-year-old Republican has indicated plans to increase US pressure on Moscow to stop the fighting in Ukraine and negotiate a peace deal.
On Tuesday, Trump said he was giving Russian president Vladimir Putin 10 days to change course in Ukraine or face unspecified punishment.
"We're going to put on tariffs and stuff," he said, but added, "I don't know if it's going to effect Russia because obviously he wants to keep the war going."
India, the world’s most populous country, was among the first major economies to start broader trade talks with Washington.
However, after six months, Trump’s wide-ranging demands and India’s reluctance to fully open its agricultural and dairy sectors have prevented a deal that would protect it from punitive tariffs.
On Tuesday, Trump had said India could face a 20–25 per cent rate since no trade deal had been finalised. The announced tariffs will significantly increase from the current 10 per cent baseline tariff on Indian shipments to the US.
Wider global tariff threats
Trump has aimed to reshape the global economy by using US economic power to pressure trading partners with tariffs and push foreign companies to move operations to the United States.
Talks are ongoing with the European Union, China, Canada and other major partners.
He has also warned that dozens of other countries could face higher tariffs from Friday unless they strike trade deals. Among them is Brazil, which Trump has threatened with 50 per cent import tariffs, partly to pressure the country to halt the trial of former president Jair Bolsonaro on coup charges.
THE BANK OF ENGLAND (BoE) is expected to lower its key interest rate to 4 per cent from 4.25 per cent on Thursday and to make another cut before the end of the year. This comes as consumer price inflation rose close to double the central bank’s 2 per cent target in June.
Policymakers are divided over whether underlying price pressures are easing and if a slowing labour market and weak growth will cause inflation to fall below target in the medium term without further rate cuts.
UK's inflation rose more than in the euro zone or the United States after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, peaking at 11.1 per cent due to heavy reliance on natural gas. Inflation dropped sharply in 2023, reaching a low of 1.7 per cent in September 2024. It has since risen more than in the United States or euro zone. In May, the BoE projected inflation would return to target only by early 2027. Inflation climbed to 3.6 per cent in June, the highest since January 2024, and some economists expect it to reach 4 per cent soon.
The European Central Bank expects euro zone inflation to remain just below 2 per cent.
BoE officials monitor surveys of businesses and households for inflation expectations as indicators of future price rises and wage demands. These measures have risen over the past year. The Citi/YouGov long-term expectations index is near its highest since late 2022, while the BoE’s survey is at its highest since 2019. Some officials, however, view these surveys as reflecting recent inflation rather than predicting future trends.
While headline consumer inflation fell in 2023 before rising again, services price inflation – influenced by labour costs – and core CPI, which excludes volatile items, have stayed higher than headline inflation. Food and drink inflation, which affects public perception and impacts poorer households significantly, has also risen rapidly.
Private-sector regular wage growth, just under 5 per cent annually, has slowed from over 8 per cent two years ago but remains about 2 percentage points above pre-pandemic levels and higher than the roughly 3 per cent seen as consistent with 2 per cent inflation. The BoE and employers expect pay growth to slow towards 3 per cent over the next 18 months, easing inflationary pressure. However, the decline in wage growth has been uneven, and rising unemployment and fewer vacancies do not guarantee a rapid slowdown.
Purchasing Managers’ Index data for July showed British businesses continued to raise prices at what S&P Global described as a “robust pace.” Although price increases are below 2022 levels, they remain higher than before the pandemic. Over the past year, costs for services and manufacturing businesses have risen sharply, potentially leading to higher consumer prices if passed on.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Reeves said that measures in the last budget already targeted the wealthy.
CHANCELLOR Rachel Reeves has indicated there will be no wealth tax, saying those with the “broadest shoulders” have already contributed through existing levies.
Reeves has faced calls from Labour MPs, unions, and former minister Anneliese Dodds to impose new taxes on the savings, investments and property of the wealthy.
Dodds told the Sky News Electoral Dysfunction podcast that the Wealth Tax Commission had “looked at the operation of lots of different wealth taxes” and set out how one could work in the UK. She said she hoped the Treasury was considering the evidence and other proposals.
Reeves said that measures in the last budget already targeted the wealthy.
“We got rid of the non-domicile status in our tax system, so people who make Britain their home have to pay their taxes here. We introduced increased taxes on private jets, on second homes, and increased capital gains tax, so I think we’ve got the balance right in terms of how we tax those with the broadest shoulders,” she said.
Reeves said decisions on tax would be made in the budget, adding that the government’s priority was to grow the economy, attract investment and create jobs.
The Times reported that she is preparing to raise taxes in the autumn budget to address a £30 billion gap in public finances.
Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump and Narendra Modi shake hands as they attend a joint press conference at the White House on February 13, 2025.
INDIA is holding trade discussions with the United States, an Indian government source said on Friday, a day after US president Donald Trump signed an order imposing a 25 per cent tariff on Indian exports.
Trump announced high import duties on several countries, including 35 per cent on goods from Canada, 50 per cent for Brazil, 20 per cent for Taiwan and 39 per cent for Switzerland, according to a presidential order.
A US delegation is expected to visit New Delhi later this month, the source said to Reuters.
"We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and are confident that the relationship will continue to move forward," India's foreign ministry said on Friday.
Trade talks between the two countries have been delayed over issues such as access to India's agriculture and dairy sectors.
The tariffs could affect nearly $40 billion worth of exports from India, the world's fifth largest economy, the source said.
Without an agreement, the tariffs would place India under stricter trade conditions than other major economies, potentially affecting its economy.
The source said India would not compromise on its agriculture and dairy sectors and would not allow dairy imports due to religious opposition to animal feed in such products.
On Wednesday, Trump also threatened more penalties on India over its commercial ties with Russia and its membership in the BRICS group. There is no clarity yet on these penalties. Trump accuses BRICS of following "anti-American policies".
A senior US official said on Thursday that differences between the two countries cannot be resolved quickly to reach a trade deal.
The US has a trade deficit of $46 billion with India.
(With inputs from Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
The UK Supreme Court will issue a verdict that could reshape the car finance industry
Supreme Court to deliver ruling at 4:35pm today on £44bn car finance mis-selling scandal
Judgment concerns hidden commissions paid to dealers without disclosure to buyers
Potential for billions in compensation claims if appeal court ruling is upheld
FCA expected to confirm next steps within six weeks
Lenders argue practices were lawful; Treasury warns of market impact
Supreme Court Poised to Rule on Landmark Car Finance Case
The UK Supreme Court will issue a verdict that could reshape the car finance industry and trigger billions of pounds in compensation claims for mis-sold motor finance.
The judgment, expected at 4:35 pm Friday, will determine whether to uphold a Court of Appeal ruling from October, which found that undisclosed commissions paid by lenders to car dealers or brokers were unlawful.
The Test Case: Undisclosed Broker Commissions
The case centres around two lenders – FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers – who were found to have paid commissions to dealers arranging finance deals, without disclosing the amount or terms of those payments to borrowers.
This practice was deemed unlawful by the Court of Appeal. If the Supreme Court upholds that ruling in full, the decision could pave the way for millions of customers to seek redress for loans arranged under similar conditions.
Wider Financial Implications for the Industry
The car finance market is deeply embedded in UK car sales, with around 90% of new cars and a significant proportion of second-hand vehicles bought on finance.
A full ruling against lenders could result in huge financial liabilities for the sector. Lloyds Banking Group, heavily exposed through its Black Horse division, has already set aside £1.2 billion in anticipation of potential claims.
The Financing & Leasing Association, which represents lenders, has continued to maintain that no wrongdoing occurred.
The Role of Discretionary Commission Arrangements
At the centre of many complaints are Discretionary Commission Arrangements (DCAs), which were banned by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in 2021. Under DCAs, dealers could increase their commission by steering customers toward higher interest rates.
Thousands of consumers who purchased vehicles using DCAs before the ban are already in line for possible compensation.
What Happens Next
The FCA is expected to announce within six weeks of the Supreme Court ruling whether it will establish a centralised compensation scheme for affected borrowers. However, today’s ruling could dramatically widen the pool of those eligible for payouts if it affirms the appeal court’s full findings.
If the judges side with the lenders, the scope of potential redress will be much narrower.
Government Concern Over Financial Fallout
The UK Treasury had previously raised concerns about the potential financial impact of large-scale compensation, warning it could significantly disrupt the car finance market. The Supreme Court rejected the government’s unusual intervention request in February, affirming judicial independence in the matter.
While the Treasury supports fair outcomes for consumers, it has also cautioned that the sector must remain capable of providing essential finance options for car buyers.
Keep ReadingShow less
A Bangladeshi garment worker make clothing in the sewing section of a factory in Gazipur, Bangladesh. REUTERS/Mohammad Ponir Hossain.
BANGLADESH has negotiated a 20 per cent tariff on exports to the US, down from the 37 per cent initially proposed by US president Donald Trump, bringing relief to exporters in the world's second-largest garment supplier.
The new rate is in line with those offered to other major apparel-exporting countries such as Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Pakistan and Indonesia. India, which failed to reach a comprehensive agreement with Washington, will face a steeper 25 per cent tariff.
Trump put steep tariffs on exports from dozens of trading partners, including Canada, Brazil, India and Taiwan, ahead of a Friday (1) trade deal deadline.
The outcome secured by Bangladesh - home to a $40 billion (£32bn) apparel export sector - reflects careful negotiation, said Khalilur Rahman, national security adviser and lead negotiator.
"Protecting our apparel industry was a top priority, but we also focused our purchase commitments on U.S. agricultural products. This supports our food security goals and fosters goodwill with U.S. farming states," Rahman said.
Muhammad Yunus, the head of the country's interim government, called it a "decisive diplomatic victory".
The readymade garments sector is the backbone of Bangladesh's economy, accounting for more than 80 per cent of total export earnings, employing about four million workers, and contributing about 10 per cent to gross domestic product.
The prospect of higher US tariffs has rattled Bangladesh's ready-made garments industry, which fears losing competitiveness in one of its largest markets.
"While the 20 per cent tariff will cause some short-term pain, Bangladesh remains better positioned than many of its competitors," said Mohiuddin Rubel, additional managing director at Denim Expert Ltd, which makes jeans and other items for brands including H&M.
Exporters in neighbouring India said the relatively higher tariffs levied would hurt the country's textile exports, as its competitors like Bangladesh, Vietnam and Cambodia got lower tariffs.
"We are hoping that the tariffs will be rationalised. We will have to recalibrate our strategies depending on the final tariff imposed, said Chintan Thakker, chairman of industry body ASSOCHAM in the state of Gujarat, a major apparel exporter.
Pakistan, which exported about $4.1bn (£3.3bn) worth of apparel to the US in the 2024 fiscal year, secured a tariff rate of 19 per cent, but industry figures were cautious about the immediate impact.
"Considering India's lower production costs and the likelihood of it negotiating reduced tariffs in the near term, Pakistan is unlikely to either gain or lose a meaningful share in the apparel segment," Musadaq Zulqarnain, founder and chair of Interloop Limited, a leading Pakistani exporter.
"If the current reciprocal tariff structure holds, significant investment is likely to flow into DR-CAFTA countries and Egypt," he said, referring to a trade agreement between the US and a group of Caribbean and Central American countries.
Elsewhere in South Asia, Sri Lanka also secured a 20 per cent tariff rate from the US, which accounted for 40 per cent of its apparel exports of $4.8bn (£3.8bn) last year.
"The devil will be in the details as there are questions over issues such as trans-shipment, but overall it's mostly good," Yohan Lawrence, secretary general of the Joint Apparel Associations Forum, a Sri Lankan industry body, told Reuters.