Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

The truth about artificial sweeteners: Are they harmless zero-calorie alternatives?

Long-term and consistent use of artificial sweeteners may pose health risks such as heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, and increased mortality risk in adults

The truth about artificial sweeteners: Are they harmless zero-calorie alternatives?

The World Health Organization (WHO) has released new guidelines discouraging the use of non-sugar sweeteners as a healthier substitute for real sugar.

The review highlights artificial sweeteners such as Splenda, Equal, and Stevia, do not guarantee long-term weight loss and should not be relied upon to manage body weight, media reports said.


While these sugar substitutes are FDA-approved and commonly used, the WHO expressed concern over potential long-term health risks associated with their overuse. They caution against marketing them as healthier alternatives.

Francesco Branca, WHO Director for Nutrition and Food Safety, states that replacing sugar with artificial sweeteners does not effectively aid in long-term weight control. Instead, individuals are encouraged to reduce their intake of free sugars by consuming naturally occurring sugars from fruits and unsweetened food and beverages.

Branca emphasises that sugar substitutes lack nutritional value and should be minimised in one's diet from an early age for improved health.

It is important to note that the guidelines do not apply to individuals diagnosed with diabetes, as the study did not include participants with preexisting diabetes and therefore could not assess their response to sugar substitutes.

The main objective of these guidelines is to inform consumers that although artificial sweeteners are marketed as diet-friendly alternatives, they do not deliver the expected health benefits.

The review examined 283 studies, which revealed that nonsugar substitutes have only a minor impact on reducing body weight and calorie intake compared to sugar.

Furthermore, long-term and consistent use of artificial sweeteners may pose health risks such as heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, and increased mortality risk in adults.

According to experts, while considering new health information, it is important to differentiate between association and causation. Erin Palinski-Wade, author of "2 Day Diabetes Diet," advises caution and highlights that individuals who seek out sugar substitutes may also engage in other dietary and lifestyle factors that contribute to obesity, Type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

It does not necessarily mean that artificial sweeteners directly cause these conditions.

Overall, nutrition experts recommend limiting the intake of both artificial sweeteners and real sugar for maintaining good overall health.

More For You

nutrition

The organisation's research found traffic light labelling remains the preferred option among consumers

iStock

Which? urges UK government to mandate front of pack nutrition labelling amid obesity crisis

Highlights

  • 64 per cent of adults in England are overweight or living with obesity, costing NHS over £11 bn annually.
  • Traffic light labelling system introduced in 2013 remains voluntary, leading to inconsistent use across retailers.
  • Research shows 47 per cent of shoppers find current labels easy to understand, with 33 per cent checking nutrition information first.

Consumer champion Which? has called on the government to make front-of-pack nutrition labels mandatory across the UK, warning that urgent action is needed to address the country's growing obesity crisis.

The organisation's research, which tracked the shopping habits of over 500 people through their mobile phones, found that while traffic light labelling remains the preferred option among consumers, the current voluntary system is being used inconsistently across major manufacturers and retailers.

Keep ReadingShow less