Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Starmer under pressure from party MPs after Mandelson dismissal

Mandelson was removed last week after Bloomberg published emails showing messages of support he sent following Jeffrey Epstein’s conviction for sex offences. The dismissal comes just ahead of Donald Trump’s state visit.

Starmer Mandelson

Starmer talks with Mandelson during a welcome reception at the ambassador's residence on February 26, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty

PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer is facing questions within the Labour party after the sacking of US ambassador Peter Mandelson.

Mandelson was removed last week after Bloomberg published emails showing messages of support he sent following Jeffrey Epstein’s conviction for sex offences. The dismissal comes just ahead of US president Donald Trump’s state visit.


Labour MPs have expressed frustration with the prime minister’s leadership. Labour backbencher Richard Burgon told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that Starmer would be “gone” if May’s elections in Scotland, Wales and England go badly. “If May’s elections go as people predict and the opinion polls predict, then I think Starmer will be gone at that time,” he said.

Helen Hayes told BBC Radio 4’s Westminster Hour that if the dismissal affected Labour’s performance in the May 2026 local elections, questions about Starmer’s leadership would follow. She said she felt “devastated” about Mandelson but argued he should not have been appointed.

Baroness Smith defended Starmer, telling BBC Breakfast that Burgon had never supported him. She admitted Mandelson’s sacking was “not what we would have wanted” before Trump’s visit but said the prime minister was doing a good job.

Meanwhile, Conservative MP Alex Burghart demanded the release of documents related to Mandelson’s appointment, calling Starmer’s judgement “appalling.” He said the PM ignored warnings about Mandelson’s links to Epstein. Downing Street has said Starmer only learned of the emails on Wednesday and acted immediately.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

UK Net Zero Economy

The political debate over net zero is increasingly shifting from the target itself to how Britain sells its energy transition

iStock

Why has ‘net zero’ become such a political headache for Britain?

  • MPs have called for “net zero” to be removed from the name of the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero and from key government communications.
  • The committee says misinformation and concerns over energy costs have damaged the phrase’s positive association.
  • Andy Burnham has reaffirmed Britain’s commitment to reaching net zero by 2050 and announced new funding for community-led clean-energy projects.

The phrase 'net zero' is becoming an increasingly awkward piece of political language in Britain.

The Commons Energy Security and Net Zero Committee has argued that the term has lost much of its positive association and has become a “lightning rod” for opposition to climate action.

Keep ReadingShow less