Ishwak Singh, who rose to overnight fame after the rousing success of Amazon Prime Video’s Pataal Lok (2020), is currently seen as Vikram Sarabhai in SonyLIV’s latest streaming show, Rocket Boys. Also featuring Jim Sarbh, the eight-episode series has garnered positive response from the audience and critics alike.
In a candid conversation with Eastern Eye, Singh talks about how he bagged the show, his preparation to play Sarabhai, a physicist and astronomer who initiated space research and helped develop nuclear power in India, and much more.
The trailer for Rocket Boys received a tremendous response from the audience. How did it feel?
I felt great. I mean, the entire team worked very hard for almost two years on the show. We worked through a very difficult patch of lockdowns and the pandemic, and it was kind of emotional too. Now it’s out. It almost feels amazing. It’s almost surreal. When I saw the trailer, it was amazing to recall all those moments of how we sort of got to these locations and did these scenes. So yeah, I am just overwhelmed, excited, and emotional.
How did this show come to you?
This was right after Paatal Lokhad released. About a month or two after my work had been appreciated, I got an opportunity to audition for this part, and my audition was accepted, so I got on board. So that was it. In June and July of 2020, we began shooting. So, it has been a long, wonderful journey. We all worked as a unit. There was great camaraderie among all the actors. I had a great time doing this.
What was your reaction when you were first approached for this role? Did you say yes to it in one go?
There were so many things to look for. And I am sure each actor has his or her own...There are certain things I look for in a project; the maker, the writing, the platform, and the director’s vision. It is not every day that you get to be a part of something where all of this is present, and it is exciting and great.
This is kind of a period show. What kinds of characters do you like to play? A character that is set in a historical setting or a character set in present times?
Both. I mean, you can’t choose. It has its own fun. They have their own sets of opportunities. It’s like asking a foodie, "What do you like?" He will be like, "I like everything. I just like good food. " Whether it is contemporary, historical, or a modern classic, I like everything. You know, I was on stage. I used to do so many different stories, ranging from Prem Chand to some European American writers and modern Indian contemporary writers. Every show has its own unique thing. And that’s what every actor enjoys: versatility, different kinds of stories. I can’t pick one. I enjoy everything.
How did you prepare yourself for the character you were playing and what were the challenges that came your way?
There were not many challenges with this. We have been doing this. You enjoy this. You love it. It requires discipline, it requires commitment, it requires consistent work, a lot of hard work, and ingenuity to develop the character. I read books, spoke to the family; they were involved too; I read a lot of references; I read the script; I did workshops with the director; I did lots of rehearsals with Jim Sarbh, and all the actors worked hard and worked together. It's like, you know, you immerse yourself. There is no rule for it, there is no formula for it. At least that’s how it works for me. Once you are in it, you immerse yourself, and then the path is carved on its own. And that’s something that I enjoy. It surprises you, to begin with. You are the first person who gets surprised and says, "Oh wow! I found the way! By doing certain things that were not planned, I found this thing about this guy.” It just happens.
How familiar were you with your character before you were approached to play him?
I had read about it in school and was familiar with it. Of course, I just mentioned the kind of depth, length, and breadth of the character of this gentleman that we explored. From that point of view, I knew nothing of him. And I got to know a lot about him and his personal achievements, his academic achievements, his life as an educator, his life as a thinker, as a scientist, as a business industrialist. All those things. It is a very inspiring character. More than that, he was a wonderful human being.
How did your life change after the rousing success of Paatal Lok?
Yeah, life changed. The best thing that happened was that people became aware of me. A lot more people became aware of me, I would say, the people who you really want to work with. Also, your family, your friends, your audience, and everyone that you know. They know that you are doing this. But no one really knows who you are. I have done a lot of work on stage, but I feel that there is a certain thing I have worked on, which you can call it like every actor has their own voice. So my voice was what it was. What is my skill set? What is my unique skill set? This is why I do this, why I am relevant, which I wanted people to know, the filmmakers to know, so they became aware of that and specifically told me things about the performance of what I wished to believe my craft was. They told me that this is what we saw in your performance. That was the biggest reward. My favourite filmmakers, such as Anurag Kashyap, praised the performance, as did a slew of other directors I admire.
Do you think Paatal Lok didto your career what films like Raanjhanaa (2013) and Tamasha (2015) failed to do?
I wouldn’t say they failed. I was very new at that time. And one thing: I have always had faith in the industry, the people, and the makers. I believe that if I was given a certain chance of, say, in the largest scheme of things, things of less significance. You know, I probably deserved that at that point in time. If you had told me to do a performance like Paatal Lok in 2012, I don’t think I would have been able to deliver what I have because it has been a long journey. It has been a long 10-12 years of consistent work on stage, in parts like these, the ones that you mentioned. I was preparing for all these roles, bit-sized roles, medium-sized roles, and things kept taking a step forward. So it's been consistent in that sense. So it's been a long journey and I have learned a lot in the last year. So that was all there was to the show, the actor, and the performance that you liked in Paatal Lok.
You studied to be an architect. How did acting happen to you?
I am an architect. I am a qualified architect. I was even working when I was on stage. I was a practicing architect. I was worried to act for as long as I can remember. It was just that I was pushing it. Not now, not now. Because I was also a little keen on studying architecture. I had a family influence, I was very fond of art and sketching, so it was a subject my brother also studied. My father is into it. It used to fascinate me too, but this is a kind of inner calling that I had from a very young age to be on stage, to act, to perform, and when I grew up, I used to flirt with this idea of making it a profession, and I kind of liked the idea. But it's just that I guessed that. It's like you have no connection with performing arts and no one in your family is doing that. So it takes time, and it takes time for a whole lot of things to convince yourself, to take that bold decision of breaking a mould and stepping out. It's not easy. It's very difficult to even walk into an acting class.
How did your parents react when you told them that you wanted to pursue acting as a profession?
I didn’t make an announcement. Like I said, after college, I did my practice too. I was doing work on stage. A lot of people, you know, in Delhi, work and also do theatre. I mean, I was very happy working on stage and at that time, those were the years, I wouldn’t say years of doubt, but the initial years when I didn't even know how capable I was. But it was just that I had this desire to do it. Other than work, what is it that I like to do? I liked to go out and chill, play a sport, you know, all of that. But I just loved being on stage and I found that the Asmita theatre gave me that opportunity, so I worked with them and one thing led to the other. I was a part of their weekend workshops and became part of the core group. A lot of these casting directors look for talent in theatre groups. So that’s how film work started and all this. Also, for the longest time, I was also working as an architect. Even after Aligarh (2016), it was only around Veere Di Wedding (2018) that I kind of completely sort of stopped and before Paatal Lok because it was just too much. And so, it has been a gradual thing. You know, my parents have seen this journey of someone who has just expressed his desire to take up theatre workshop and they saw my first performance and then up to the point of Paatal Lok released and now it is Rocket Boys so it is like we have never had this conversation in a way that I am quitting this and taking that. They saw a natural progression that I am doing it passionately, changing me for the better in every sense being an actor. I guess that’s what parents want from their kids. To be happy and the other way round.
I interviewed your co-star Jim Sarbh recently, and he had a lot of good things to say about you. What was your experience working for him?
My experience was great. I learned a lot from him on stage, on-screen, and off-screen. I wish to work with him again. On stage and also in a film. He is great, I respect him. I always wanted to work with him because a part of the reason I do this is that I want to collaborate with actors such as Jim Sarbh, and it’s amazing, you know, once you are out and you have done it and moved on, I realised that I was so much more competent having worked with him consistently over a long time. It's almost like you have shared your trade secrets with each other. So he has given me so much.
What’s the USP of Rocket Boys that the audience should notice and binge-watch the show?
It’s a very honest effort. It’s a beautiful subject and it talks about something we are all very proud of. Our science, our scientists, educators of our country, the nation builders, but it is also a human story. So you have a lot to take from the story. It’s not a singular thing, it's not one.
There’s no question who ruled the night at the 2025 BET Awards. Kendrick Lamar walked away with five trophies, including Album of the Year for GNX and Video of the Year for Not Like Us. The ceremony, held at the Peacock Theatre in Los Angeles, paid tribute to Black excellence in music, acting, and sports, and Kendrick made sure his voice and message were front and centre.
Kendrick Lamar accepts Best Album for GNX at the BET Awards in Los AngelesGetty Images
Lamar, Doechii, and a moment that mattered
The GNX rapper also won Best Male Hip-Hop Artist and shared the Video Director of the Year award with Dave Free. Accepting his award, Lamar reflected on his long-standing relationship with BET, saying, “They’ve always kept the culture at the core and put me in the middle of it.”
— (@)
Rising rapper Doechii also made headlines, not just for winning Best Female Hip-Hop Artist but for calling out former US President Donald Trump. In a fiery speech, she criticised the use of military force to break up protests in LA following ICE raids in Latino communities. “Every time we stand up for our rights, the military is sent in. What kind of leadership is that?” she asked the crowd.
A night of icons and throwbacks
The night wasn’t just about current stars. The BET Ultimate Icon Award honoured Mariah Carey, Snoop Dogg, Jamie Foxx, and gospel star Kirk Franklin for their decades of influence in music, entertainment, and community action. Stevie Wonder presented Foxx’s award as he opened up about his recovery from a 2023 stroke. “When I saw the ‘In Memoriam’ segment, I thought that could’ve been me,” he said.
Mariah Carey celebrates her Ultimate Icon Award with a rare live performanceGetty Images
Mariah Carey, presented her award by Busta Rhymes, lit up the stage with a brief but heartfelt speech. “If you're going to win one of these, it might as well be the Ultimate Icon,” she joked, hinting at the ups and downs of her legendary career.
With Lamar and SZA heading back on tour and voices like Doechii’s rising louder, the 2025 BET Awards proved it is a stage for change.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Harris Dickinson debuts as Rhode’s first male model in new Glazing Mist campaign
Rhode, Hailey Bieber’s rapidly growing skincare label, has chosen Babygirl actor Harris Dickinson as the face of its new product, the Glazing Mist. Known for his understated performances and growing fashion presence, Dickinson is the first male model to front a campaign for the brand. The new mist, priced at £24 (₹2,520), goes live on 24 June exclusively at rhodeskin.com.
A surprising choice that feels just right
The campaign, shot in stark black-and-white, features close-up visuals of Dickinson misting his face with the Glazing Mist, designed to refresh skin and deliver a natural glow. With ingredients like ectoin, ceramides, and magnolia extract, the formula offers both hydration and barrier support. It has also earned a stamp of approval from the National Eczema Association.
Hailey Bieber explained her choice simply: she watched Babygirl, loved Dickinson’s performance, and sensed he could bring the kind of quiet edge she wanted. “I didn’t want it to feel too ‘on-the-nose’ with the film,” she said. “It had to be chic and sporty.” The internet, however, couldn’t resist the connection to Dickinson’s now-infamous milk scene in the film, and fans were quick to point out how the dewy mist echoed that very vibe.
Rhode expands, without changing its DNA
Since its 2022 launch, Rhode has stood out for sleek, limited product drops and a focused digital presence. Its recent £790 million (₹82,950 crore) acquisition by e.l.f. Beauty has only amplified interest in where the brand goes next. While introducing a male face might suggest a shift, Bieber was clear: this isn’t about launching a men’s line but widening the brand’s appeal. “I want everyone to see themselves in Rhode,” she said.
Dickinson’s inclusion reflects a subtle repositioning. Best known for roles in Beach Rats, Triangle of Sadness, and now Babygirl, he has also been a regular in fashion, working with Dior and Loewe.
With this campaign, Rhode continues to evolve clearly, without losing the minimalist identity that made it stand out in the first place.
Keep ReadingShow less
HBO’s Harry Potter reboot slammed for casting Italian actress as Indian character Parvati Patil
HBO’s upcoming Harry Potter reboot is already under fire, this time for casting Italian actress Alessia Leoni as Parvati Patil, a character rooted in Indian culture. The announcement has triggered widespread backlash from fans who accuse the makers of side-lining authentic South Asian representation in favour of what many see as surface-level diversity.
Parvati, originally portrayed by Shefali Chowdhury in the films, is one of the few explicitly Indian characters in the Harry Potter universe. The decision to cast someone with no clear Indian heritage has led to heated discussions across platforms like Reddit and X, with fans calling out what they perceive as performative inclusivity.
Fans question why Indian talent was overlooked again
Many online comments have shared similar frustrations: that casting a brown-skinned actor is not the same as casting someone of Indian origin. “They just picked someone who looks brown and called it a day,” one Redditor commented. Another added, “Parvati is not just a name, it’s a direct reference to Hindu culture. It deserved more thought.”
This is not the first controversy to hit the reboot. Earlier announcements like casting Paapa Essiedu as Snape and Arabella Stanton as Hermione also drew criticism from those who felt the series was playing fast and loose with established character identities. Supporters of accurate representation argue that while the intent may be diversity, the execution often feels tokenistic.
— (@)
Adding fuel to the fire is the casting history of the original films, where British-Bangladeshi actors Shefali Chowdhury and Afshan Azad played the Patil twins after being discovered through grassroots-level auditions. That sense of grounded authenticity, fans argue, is missing in the current reboot.
HBO's broader casting choices also under scrutiny
Alongside Leoni, HBO announced several other cast members: Katherine Parkinson as Molly Weasley, Lox Pratt as Draco Malfoy, Johnny Flynn as Lucius Malfoy, Leo Earley as Seamus Finnigan, Sienna Moosah as Lavender Brown, Bel Powley and Daniel Rigby as the Dursleys, and Bertie Carvel as Cornelius Fudge.
— (@)
The series, hoped to be a faithful adaptation of J.K. Rowling’s books, is scheduled to premiere in 2026. But with these early casting calls, many longtime fans feel HBO is missing the mark on cultural nuance—and all this before a single spell has been cast on screen.
The tense deliberations in Harvey Weinstein’s New York sex crimes retrial have descended into open conflict. Jurors are reportedly attacking each other, pressuring hold-outs, and improperly considering the disgraced movie mogul’s notorious past, information explicitly banned from their discussions. This internal strife forced the jury foreperson to urgently alert the judge on Monday morning about a “situation which isn’t very good”, casting serious doubt on their ability to reach a fair verdict.
Infighting and forbidden arguments taint deliberations
According to a court transcript, the foreperson painted a grim picture for Judge Curtis Farber. Jurors are “not on the same page”, with some actively “attacking” others in a bid to change minds. Crucially, they are “pushing people” by bringing up Weinstein’s public history, details not presented as evidence during this specific trial.
As per reports, Jurors are in a heated debate during Weinstein retrial deliberationsGetty Images
This is similar to the earlier “playground stuff” reported last week, where one young juror felt unfairly “shunned” and questioned the fairness of the process, though the judge kept him on the panel. The jury itself signalled deep divisions, requesting a reread of “reasonable doubt” rules and guidance on “avoiding a hung jury”.
Mistrial denied, but jury reminded “Stick to the evidence”
Weinstein’s lawyers, citing a “tainted” and “runaway jury”, immediately seized on the turmoil to demand a mistrial. Defence attorney Arthur Aidala argued jurors were “ganging up” and considering “things that were not brought into this trial”. Prosecutors countered that some past context was legally permissible. Judge Farber denied the mistrial but took swift action. He hauled the entire jury back in, sternly instructing them that deliberations must focus only on evidence presented during the retrial concerning the three specific charges, including rape and criminal sex acts involving three women. He reiterated they must disregard anything else they knew about Weinstein.
Weinstein jury divided by heated disputes over forbidden pastGetty Images
The jury ended Monday claiming they were “making progress”, even asking for coffee to fuel further talks and requesting to revisit some testimony. However, the damage from the infighting and forbidden discussions lingers.
Weinstein, 73, already serving a long sentence for a separate California rape conviction, awaits this jury’s verdict on charges stemming from allegations by a former production assistant, an aspiring actress, and a model. This retrial, ordered after his landmark 2020 New York conviction was overturned, remains a critical, though now deeply troubled, chapter in the #MeToo saga he set to fire.
Keep ReadingShow less
Charli XCX celebrates a year of Brat’s cultural takeover
It’s been a full year since Charli XCX dropped Brat, and the album’s neon-green grip on pop culture has not loosened. Forget fading summer anthems; Brat feels permanently wired into the now. How did an artist long celebrated for being ahead of the curve finally make the whole world tune in? Well, she did it entirely her own way.
Charli was no newcomer. She smashed charts a decade ago with “Fancy” and penned hits for others. Yet mainstream stardom on her own terms felt elusive until Brat. The rollout was masterful, starting with the divisive “Von Dutch”, then the It Girl-packed “360” video featuring faces like Julia Fox and Chloë Sevigny, who soon became unavoidable.
Charli XCX arrives for the 2025 Met GalaGetty Images
Crucially, she nurtured her core fans (“Angels”) with intimate pop-up shows, birthing the iconic Brat Wall, where teasers about collaborations and the deluxe album kept excitement boiling. When Brat landed, hitting No. 3 in the US and No. 2 in the UK, it was a moment of absolute cultural takeover.
Beyond the music: building a movement
Brat’s fire spread far beyond the songs. A simple tweet : “Kamala IS brat”, saw the US Vice President’s campaign adopt the album’s aesthetic overnight, sparking global chatter. Charli directly addressed fan speculation, confirming “Girl, So Confusing” was about Lorde, then brilliantly working it out with her on a remix weeks later. She refused to let the moment die, dropping a full remix album (Brat and It’s the Same but There’s Three More Songs so It’s Not), featuring everyone from Billie Eilish to underground stars, which pushed Brat to UK No. 1.
Charli XCX performing on stage Getty Images
The Sweat and Brat tours became must-see events, packed with surprise guests. Grammy wins followed, plus SNL, Coachella and film cameos. Even her older song “Party 4 U” surged up the charts years later. Charli questioned at Coachella: “Does this mean brat summer is finally over?” The answer seems clear. Brat wasn’t just a seasonal hit. It was almost like Charli XCX meticulously crafting a phenomenon, proving that staying fiercely true to her vision was the ultimate key to connect with a wide audience.