Modi warns of strong response to any future terrorist attack
In his first address to the nation since hostilities began last Wednesday, Modi said Pakistan had chosen to attack instead of cooperating in the fight against "terrorism".
'If another terrorist attack against India is carried out, a strong response will be given,' Modi said.
Vivek Mishra works as an Assistant Editor with Eastern Eye and has over 13 years of experience in journalism. His areas of interest include politics, international affairs, current events, and sports. With a background in newsroom operations and editorial planning, he has reported and edited stories on major national and global developments.
PRIME MINISTER Narendra Modi on Monday said India would respond strongly to any future terrorist attack and would not tolerate "nuclear blackmail" in case of further conflict with Pakistan.
His remarks came after a weekend ceasefire appeared to be holding following four days of heavy fighting between the two sides. US president Donald Trump, who said he brokered the ceasefire, claimed on Monday that US intervention had prevented a "bad nuclear war".
"We stopped a nuclear conflict... millions of people could have been killed. So I'm very proud of that," Trump told reporters at the White House.
In his first address to the nation since hostilities began last Wednesday, Modi said Pakistan had chosen to attack instead of cooperating in the fight against "terrorism".
"If another terrorist attack against India is carried out, a strong response will be given," he said.
The conflict was triggered by an April 22 attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians. India blamed Pakistan for backing the attack, a charge Islamabad denied.
India launched missile attacks early Wednesday on what it called "terrorist camps" in the Pakistan-administered part of Kashmir. This was followed by days of exchanges involving warplanes, drones, missiles and artillery. At least 60 people were killed on both sides.
"If Pakistan wants to survive, it will have to destroy its terror infrastructure," Modi said on Monday.
"India will strike with precision and decisiveness against the terrorist groups thriving under the cover of nuclear blackmail.
"India's stand is very clear. Terror and talks cannot go together... Terror and trade cannot go together... Water and blood cannot flow together."
The Indian army said Monday night was the "first calm night in recent days" in the Kashmir region and along the western border with Pakistan.
The violence, the worst since the 1999 conflict, raised concerns that it could escalate into a wider war. Both sides accused each other of breaching the ceasefire hours after it was announced by Trump on social media on Saturday.
Top military officials from India and Pakistan held briefings on Sunday night, with each side claiming success and warning of retaliation if attacked again.
"We have delivered the promise we made to our people," Pakistan’s military spokesman Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry said, calling it a "success on the battleground".
"We have thus far exercised immense restraint so far and our actions have been focused, measured and non-escalatory," said Indian Lieutenant General Rajiv Ghai.
Pakistan claimed it had shot down five Indian fighter jets, a claim India has not responded to.
On Monday, people began returning to the town of Poonch in Indian-administered Kashmir, one of the worst-hit areas. Thousands of schools remained closed in Pakistan-administered Kashmir as local officials cleared debris from the fighting, said local official Naveed-Ul-Hassan Bukhari.
India reopened 32 airports that had been closed during the conflict, authorities said.
Terrorist activity has increased in Kashmir since 2019, when prime minister Narendra Modi’s government revoked the region’s limited autonomy and brought it under direct central control.
Kashmir, a Muslim-majority region, is claimed in full by both countries.
Senior military officers from both sides were reported to have spoken on Monday to support the ceasefire.
Abdul Basit at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore said the discussion would be about the "modalities of the ceasefire" and not about broader policy decisions.
The aim, he said, is to "avoid any miscalculations, because right now one spark could quickly move towards a nuclear catastrophe," he told AFP.
A-LEVEL students across England, Wales and Northern Ireland have achieved record-high results outside of the Covid years, with boys overtaking girls in the top grades for the first time since 2018.
Figures released on Thursday (14) showed that 28.3 per cent of entries were awarded an A or A*, up from 27.8 per cent last year and well above the 25.4 per cent seen in 2019. Almost one in ten results — 9.4 per cent — achieved the highest A* grade, the largest proportion since the top grade was introduced in 2010, excluding the pandemic years.
More than 340,000 teenagers received their grades this morning, while the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) confirmed a record number had secured university and college places.
Education secretary Bridget Phillipson said, “Today is a time for celebration as young people up and down the country collect their exam results. Every young person should have the opportunity to achieve and thrive. This government won’t stand by and accept the entrenched inequalities that continue to blight the life chances of too many young people, especially those from white working class backgrounds who have long been overlooked.
“We’re already taking decisive action and making encouraging progress. With great options from degree apprenticeships and high-quality technical qualifications to traditional university routes, we are giving young people the tools they need to get great jobs, fill talent gaps, and help drive economic growth as part of our Plan for Change.”
London mayor Sadiq Khan congratulated students and encouraged those disappointed with their grades to seek advice from teachers, parents or the National Career Service. “I wish you all every success as you now take your next step in life,” he said.
This year, 28.4 per cent of boys’ entries achieved an A or A*, compared with 28.2 per cent of girls’. Boys also extended their lead in the highest A* grade, with 9.9 per cent compared with 9.1 per cent for girls. Girls continued to outperform boys across more subjects overall, especially in psychology, biology, sociology, art and design, and economics, and more girls achieved grades C and above.
Vivienne Stern, chief executive of Universities UK, said: “Today marks the beginning of doors opening for thousands of students. The increase in applications confirms that people rightly recognise the value of going to university, and it is particularly positive that we have seen an increase in students from the least advantaged backgrounds.”
Claire Thomson of exam board AQA said the differences between genders “bounce around a bit over time” and were likely due to “multi-faceted and complex” causes.
According to reports, mathematics remains the most popular A-level subject for the 12th year running, with entries rising 4.4 per cent to 112,000. Psychology stayed in second place, followed by biology. Business studies entered the top five for the first time, while physics jumped from ninth to sixth place.
Jo Saxton, chief executive of UCAS, said students were becoming more strategic about their subject choices, with a rise in STEM and business-focused studies reflecting career considerations. “Students are super savvy. They are clearly thinking about what they imagine their future career might look like,” she told Times Radio.
London recorded the highest share of A or A* grades at 32.1 per cent, while the north-east had the lowest at 22.9 per cent. The gap between these regions has grown to 9.2 percentage points, the widest since the current grading system began in 2010.
Pepe Di’Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: “Big differences in attainment between regions, reflecting socioeconomic factors, remain a massive challenge. We have to stop merely talking about these issues and actually address them with investment in communities suffering from generational disadvantage.”
The results raised questions about whether grade inflation could be returning, but Ofqual chief regulator Sir Ian Bauckham insisted that standards had not changed. “We can be absolutely confident that the standard of work required to get any grade at A-level is the same this year as it was last year,” he said.
While students celebrate, many face rising university costs. From September, tuition fees for full-time courses in England will rise to £9,535 — the first increase since 2017.
Despite economic pressures, UCAS has assured students that universities have “student protection plans” in place to safeguard their studies.
Queen Elizabeth’s School students with their results
Queen Elizabeth’s School shines
Queen Elizabeth’s School, Barnet, has marked its 20th consecutive year of outstanding A-level results, with more than 95 per cent of grades at A*–B throughout this period.
This year, 98 per cent of grades achieved by the school’s largest ever Year 13 cohort of 174 boys were in the top range. Over half of all grades (51 per cent) were at A*, a four per cent rise on the best pre-pandemic year, while 85 per cent were A* or A. In all, 51 boys – 29 per cent of the year group – achieved straight A*s, a statement said.
Headmaster Neil Enright praised the results, saying: “Huge congratulations go to our students on these brilliant results. At Queen Elizabeth's we see consistent excellence every year, with our boys securing places on highly sought-after courses at world-leading universities.”
This year, 49 boys (28 per cent) gained offers from Oxford or Cambridge. Overall, 62 per cent hold offers from QS World Top 10 universities, including Oxford, Cambridge, Imperial College London and UCL. Twenty-two of the 24 Russell Group universities made offers to the pupils.
Popular degree choices included mathematics, medicine, engineering and economics, with 14 boys taking up computing courses at top universities. More students are also choosing degree apprenticeships, with offers from companies such as Goldman Sachs, Amazon, Deloitte, Jaguar Land Rover and PwC, the statement added/
Enright credited the school’s academic and co-curricular programmes for the breadth of success. He said support would continue for leavers in the coming weeks and looked forward to welcoming them into the school's connect alumni network.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
The Canary Wharf business district including global financial institutions in London. (Photo: Getty Images)
UK's economy grew more than expected in the second quarter, though at a slower pace than the first three months of 2025, as US tariffs and a higher UK business tax weighed on activity, official data showed on Thursday.
Gross domestic product rose 0.3 per cent in April-June, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said, above analyst forecasts of 0.1 per cent growth. This followed a 0.7 per cent rise in the first quarter.
“Today’s economic figures are positive with a strong start to the year and continued growth in the second quarter,” said finance minister Rachel Reeves.
“But there is more to do to deliver an economy that works for working people,” she added, after a challenging first year in power for the Labour government.
The ONS said growth in construction and services in the second quarter helped offset a fall in production.
“Growth was led by services, with computer programming, health and vehicle leasing growing,” said Liz McKeown, ONS director of economic statistics.
Data released on Wednesday showed UK unemployment at a four-year high of 4.7 per cent in the second quarter.
The slowdown comes after the government raised the UK business tax from April, when US President Donald Trump’s 10 per cent baseline tariff on most goods also took effect.
Citing risks from US tariffs, the Bank of England last week cut its key interest rate by a quarter point to 4 per cent.
“The weak global economy will remain a drag on UK GDP growth for a while yet,” said Ruth Gregory, deputy chief UK economist at Capital Economics.
“The full drag on business investment from April’s tax rises has yet to be felt. And the ongoing speculation about further tax rises in the (UK) autumn budget will probably keep consumers in a cautious mood,” she added.
Keep ReadingShow less
'This was the fourth time in less than a year that a BAPS temple has been targeted' (Photo: Facebook)
THE signboard of a Hindu temple was defaced in Indiana, US, an incident described by the Indian consulate as "reprehensible".
The "hateful act" took place at the BAPS Swaminarayan Temple in Greenwood city, the temple's official public affairs account said in an X post on Tuesday (12).
This was the fourth time in less than a year that a BAPS temple has been targeted, it said.
In the latest incident vandals defaced the main signboard of the religious site. The attack took place last Sunday (10), just days before the Hindu festival of Krishna Janmashtami, which falls on Saturday (16).
The Indian Consulate in Chicago has strongly condemned the incident, describing it as "reprehensible" in a statement posted on social media platform X. The consulate confirmed it has contacted local law enforcement authorities and demanded "prompt action" against those responsible.
"Desecration of the main signboard of the BAPS Swaminarayan Temple in Greenwood, Indiana, is reprehensible," the consulate stated. Officials have raised the matter with police and called for swift justice.
The consul general personally addressed a gathering of worshippers and local leaders, including the mayor of Greenwood, "calling for unity & solidarity, and vigilance against miscreants there."
This latest attack continues a troubling pattern of hate crimes targeting Hindu religious sites across America. The BAPS Swaminarayan organisation, which runs temples worldwide, confirmed this was the fourth time one of their temples had been targeted in recent months.
"For the fourth time in less than a year, one of our Mandirs has been desecrated by a hateful act," the temple's public affairs division said in a statement. "The anti-Hindu hate crime against the BAPS Mandir in Greenwood, IN has only strengthened our community's resolve, and we remain united in our stand against anti-religious behaviour."
The organisation described the vandalism as both a "hateful act" and a "hate crime," emphasising the community's determination to stand firm against religious bigotry.
In March this year, another BAPS Hindu temple in California was similarly vandalised by unknown attackers. At the time, India's foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal called the act "despicable" and urged American law enforcement to take strong action against the perpetrators.
The repeated targeting of Hindu temples has drawn criticism from American politicians as well. US Congressman Nick LaLota condemned the latest incident, stating: "Religiously motivated crimes like these must be condemned and those who commit them must be held accountable. Live and let live!"
Despite the attacks, worshippers and religious leaders have emphasised their commitment to maintaining their faith and practices. The temple administration noted that the vandalism has actually "strengthened our community's resolve" rather than intimidating them.
According to reports, these incidents highlight growing concerns about religious tolerance and safety for minority communities in the US.
The BAPS operates numerous temples across America and has generally enjoyed peaceful relations with local communities.
Local authorities in Indiana are continuing their investigation into the latest incident, reports added.
(with inputs from PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
US president Donald Trump meets with Indian prime minister Narendra Modi in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 13, 2025. (Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)
INDIAN prime minister Narendra Modi is likely to meet president Donald Trump during a visit to the US next month to attend the UN General Assembly meeting, the Indian Express newspaper reported on Wednesday (13), citing sources.
India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. An Indian official familiar with the matter said a decision has not yet been taken, and that countries usually reserve slots for the General Debate at the assembly, which is why India's "head of government" features in a provisional list of speakers on September 26.
"The list will go through revisions," the official said, adding that it had not yet been decided if Modi would be going to the assembly.
The General Assembly kicks off on September 9, but the debate, the annual meeting of heads of state and government, will be held from September 23-29.
Although the reason for the potential visit will be to attend the UN meeting in New York, a key objective will be to hold talks with Trump and iron out trade and tariff issues that have led to some souring of ties between the two countries, the newspaper reported.
News of a possible Modi trip to the US comes days after Trump announced an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods to penalise New Delhi for continuing to buy Russian oil.
The penalty took the total levy on Indian goods exported to the US to 50 per cent, among the highest levied on any US trading partner.
Trump and Modi arrive to hold a joint press conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 13, 2025. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)getty images
Trade talks between New Delhi and Washington collapsed after five rounds of negotiations over disagreement on opening India's vast farm and dairy sectors and stopping Russian oil purchases.
On Tuesday (12), US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said several large trade agreements were still waiting to be completed, including with Switzerland and India, but New Delhi had been "a bit recalcitrant" in talks with Washington.
Bessent told Fox Business Network's "Kudlow" he hoped the Trump administration could wrap up its trade negotiations by the end of October.
"That's aspirational, but I think we are in a good position," he said, adding "I think we can be, we will have agreed on substantial terms with all the substantial countries."
(Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
Decisions on providing such details have been left to individual forces (Photo: Getty Images)
POLICE forces across the UK have been instructed to consider disclosing the ethnicity and nationality of suspects charged in high-profile and sensitive cases, under new national guidance aimed at improving transparency and reducing the spread of misinformation.
The direction, issued jointly by the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing, came into immediate effect on Wednesday (13).
It advised that forces should release details of a suspect’s background when there is a clear policing purpose, such as tackling false information surrounding an incident or when public safety might be at risk.
Deputy chief constable Sam de Reya, the NPCC lead for communications and media, said the change was designed for “an age of social media where information spreads rapidly — and often inaccurately”.
She added that recent high-profile cases and last summer’s disorder had shown the real-world consequences of what police choose to release. “It is essential that we fill information vacuums with accurate facts of wider public interest,” she explained.
Until now, police communications have typically named suspects, given an age, and provided an address upon charge, without any specific requirement to release nationality, ethnicity, or immigration status.
Decisions on providing such details have been left to individual forces, leading to varied approaches and criticism in some cases.
One of the most prominent recent examples involved two men charged over the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton last month. Reports suggested they were Afghan asylum seekers, but this was not officially confirmed by Warwickshire Police, which followed the existing guidance at the time.
The absence of confirmation prompted claims of a “cover-up” from political figures, including Reform UK’s Nigel Farage. The incident led home secretary Yvette Cooper to call for “more transparency” in such matters. Riots related the Southport killings last year also weighed heavily in the background to this change.
In that case, the absence of early official information about the suspect’s background allowed false claims to spread online, including that the attacker was a Muslim asylum seeker, and riots followed in several parts of England and Northern Ireland.
An independent review later said this misinformation had played a role in sparking disorder. By contrast, Merseyside Police in May quickly confirmed that a man arrested after driving into crowds during Liverpool FC’s Premier League victory parade was a white British national — a move widely credited with quelling speculation about terrorism.
According to reports, the updated guidance said forces should weigh legal, ethical, and fairness concerns before releasing details, with the final decision resting locally.
The NPCC stressed that nothing should be made public if it risks prejudicing a fair trial. The responsibility for verifying a suspect’s immigration status remains with the Home Office, which has said it will authorise the release of such information when “appropriate to do so” at the request of police.
A Home Office spokesperson said both the public and police wanted greater clarity on when and why such details are made available, as well as legitimate reasons for withholding them.
Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson has welcomed the new rules as “a positive step” towards being more open with the public, while underlining the importance of protecting due process. “We want [police] to be as open as possible,” she said, but not in a way that could prejudice a trial.
She noted that the current practice of publishing names and addresses when suspects are charged will now be extended to include nationality and ethnicity, unless there is a strong reason not to do so.
While the move has been applauded by some campaigners and former prosecutors as a way to build trust and counter false stories, others have raised concerns.
Critics warn the guidance could put extra pressure on forces to reveal details in every case, potentially stoking community tensions.
Former Metropolitan Police chief superintendent Dal Babu described a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” situation, saying the expectation to disclose could spark speculation when information is withheld.
Some anti-racism campaigners have also expressed fears that linking crime stories to ethnicity or migration status could fuel prejudice, and they argue that care must be taken to avoid stigmatising communities.
The NPCC insisted the approach is about balance. De Reya said good policing involved “proactively sharing facts to prevent the vacuum that breeds false narratives”, and that communication practices must be fit for the speed and reach of modern media.
Reports revealed that the guidance will be reviewed later in the year.