Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Why UK groups should not mirror Middle East tension

Why UK groups should not mirror Middle East tension

By Imam Qari Asim and Rabbi Laura Janner-Klausner

WHEN we look at the situation in Gaza- Palestine-Israel, we see tragedy after tragedy. With every death our hearts ache. With every violation of human rights comes rightful condemnation.


Holy sites, mosques and synagogues are being desecrated; in turn, these are dese­crating God’s name. Until an independent sovereign Palestine sits alongside an inde­pendent sovereign Israel, we must continue to raise our voices for change and against violation of human rights.

As violence erupted and shattered lives in the Middle East recently, many people told us they feel they are being silenced, that they cannot share their thoughts with­out being shouted down or shamed. They feel dialogue will only bring further tension and more anger between UK-based com­munities, particularly British Muslims and British Jews.

As an imam and a rabbi, we believe in robust, difficult and uncomfortable conver­sations; that ultimately people are good, and want to improve the situation, and cer­tainly not cause more harm.

Where is there a space for discussion and to be able to ask questions in good faith without ricochets of verbal shrapnel hitting back at us? How can Jews and Muslims, and anyone who wants to talk about Israel-Pal­estine-Gaza, avoid importing the battle lines from Gaza to Greenwich, from Bethle­hem to Birmingham and from the Temple Mount to the Thames?

There is an umbilical cord of cause and effect between the Middle East and here. Since the initial horrendous clashes at al- Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem, there’s been a reported increase in Islamophobic inci­dents of 430 per cent and an increase in anti-semitic incidents of 500 per cent. This shows that what happens in Gaza, doesn’t stay in Gaza, as Jews and Muslims in the UK are being held to account for what is hap­pening thousands of miles away.

We may have an umbilical cord of love for the Middle East, pumping spiritual blood into our bodies but no one can be held re­sponsible for the actions of others over who they have no authority. It is simply wrong and unjust to see British Jews as representa­tives of Israeli government policy, or all British Muslims as supporters of Hamas.

These are racist stereotypes. Any tempta­tion to colour a whole group with the ac­tions of overseas bodies must be immedi­ately rejected. To do so only leads to more hostility and misunderstanding – here, in the UK, in our homes, on our streets, online and in person. But unfortunately, it’s hap­pening and we’re worried.

There is another way. We can avoid com­mon, but incredibly damaging, missteps which often happen when we discuss peo­ple, areas, buildings that are precious to our very core of being.

For instance, lumping together the Is­raeli government with all Israelis is wrong, just as it is wrong to hold all British citizens accountable for the UK government. Seeing all Jews as the same is wrong. Interchanging the words, ‘Israel, Israel’s government, Zi­onists and Jews’ is factually wrong as Jews around the world are not responsible for the Israeli government, do not all believe in Zionism and certainly not in what is happening in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

Comparing Israel to the Nazis, while sometimes not done deliberately to antago­nise, is unnecessary and anti-Semitic, and only proceeds to cause distress to a Jewish population whose very existence was nearly extinguished by the Nazis within living memory. To compare a group with its oppressors is intellectually lazy, but more important, insensitive.

Similarly, assuming that outrage, dis­tress and empathy over the situation in Gaza and the Occupied Palestinian Ter­ritories means that all Muslims here hate Jews or support Hamas is also wrong, of­fensive and dangerous for the very deli­cate and increasingly fraying relation­ships between Muslims and Jews here.

Pretty much anything with the word ‘all’ or just ‘Muslims’ or ‘Jews’ won’t help. Try adding one glorious word – ‘some’. ‘Some Muslims feel x, y or z, some Jews believe x, y, or z.’ Immediately you avoid damaging generalisations.

Try turning a statement driven by emo­tion into a question. For British Muslims, this might look like asking, ‘I wonder why some Jews believe…’ Or, even better: ‘Do all Jews believe…?’ or ‘are some British Jews…?’ For British Jews, this would mean asking, ‘Why do so many Muslims care so viscerally about …’ or ‘do all British Muslims feel (or do) x, y or z?’

And finally, when you read or see some­thing that revolts or jolts or shocks, try one simple golden rule of hate avoidance. Swop the word, ‘Jew’ for ‘Muslim’ (or Hindu, or Sikh or man or woman for that matter). How would you feel if someone else said exactly the same sentence but about your own group?

Our suggestions do not mean letting oth­ers off the hook for their actions or views. It’s the opposite. Let’s hold people to ac­count for what they do and say, but ensure that it really is them who is doing the action or believing something and not what you think they have done or think.

It’s much too easy for people who hate both Muslims and Jews to be handed the gift of exploiting conflict to divide us and increase hate. A good example happened last Sunday (23) when the renowned far-right Islamaphobe Tommy Robinson at­tended a pro-Israel rally in London in an incendiary act. The rally organisers and major communal Jewish groups immedi­ately rejected his presence and so-called support. In the face of intentionally divisive figures and false allies, we must be clear that hate against one group can never ever mean solidarity with another.

Rabbi Laura’s experiences in leading the ‘People’s Peace Process’ as part of the 1993 Oslo Accords, and Imam Qari Asim’s expe­riences in interfaith here have shown the heights that can be reached in reconcilia­tion between groups on different sides of the conflict. If a former member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Pales­tine, who spent 14 years in an Israeli prison, can call for non-violent action and peaceful progress alongside his Israeli former-ene­mies, who are we to lose hope?

Last Saturday (22) in Tel Aviv, thousands of Israeli Jews and Palestinians marched together to demand peace and call for an end to the Occupation of the West Bank. If they can work together over there, we can certainly do it here.

Together, we will be running workshops on having genuinely productive dialogue, even during times of crisis. If you are inter­ested, you can contact us on Twitter @Qari­Asim @LauraJanklaus.

More For You

Baffling cabinet reshuffle

Piyush Goyal with Jonathan Reynolds at Chequers during the signing of the UK–India Free Trade Agreement in July

Baffling cabinet reshuffle

IN SIR KEIR STARMER’S cabinet reshuffle last week, triggered by the resignation of Angela Rayner, the prime minister shifted Jonathan Reynolds from business and trade secretary and president of the board of trade after barely a year in the post to chief whip, making him responsible for the party.

The move doesn’t make much sense. At Chequers, the UK-India Free Trade Agreement was signed by Reynolds, and the Indian commerce and industry minister, Piyush Goyal. They had clearly established a friendly working relationship.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

We are living faster than ever before

AMG

​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

Shiveena Haque

Finding romance today feels like trying to align stars in a night sky that refuses to stay still

When was the last time you stumbled into a conversation that made your heart skip? Or exchanged a sweet beginning to a love story - organically, without the buffer of screens, swipes, or curated profiles? In 2025, those moments feel rarer, swallowed up by the quickening pace of life.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

Shabana Mahmood, US homeland security secretary Kristi Noem, Canada’s public safety minister Gary Anandasangaree, Australia’s home affairs minister Tony Burke and New Zealand’s attorney general Judith Collins at the Five Eyes security alliance summit on Monday (8)

Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer’s government is not working. That is the public verdict, one year in. So, he used his deputy Angela Rayner’s resignation to hit the reset button.

It signals a shift in his own theory of change. Starmer wanted his mission-led government to avoid frequent shuffles of his pack, so that ministers knew their briefs. Such a dramatic reshuffle shows that the prime minister has had enough of subject expertise for now, gambling instead that fresh eyes may bring bold new energy to intractable challenges on welfare and asylum.

Keep ReadingShow less
indian-soldiers-ww1-getty
Indian infantrymen on the march in France in October 1914 during World War I. (Photo: Getty Images)
Getty Images

Comment: We must not let anti-immigration anger erase south Asian soldiers who helped save Britain

This country should never forget what we all owe to those who won the second world war against fascism. So the 80th anniversary of VE Day and VJ Day this year have had a special poignancy in bringing to life how the historic events that most of us know from grainy black and white photographs or newsreel footage are still living memories for a dwindling few.

People do sometimes wonder if the meaning of these great historic events will fade in an increasingly diverse Britain. If we knew our history better, we would understand why that should not be the case.

For the armies that fought and won both world wars look more like the Britain of 2025 in their ethnic and faith mix than the Britain of 1945 or 1918. The South Asian soldiers were the largest volunteer army in history, yet ensuring that their enormous contribution is fully recognised in our national story remains an important work in progress.

Keep ReadingShow less
Spotting the signs of dementia

Priya Mulji with her father

Spotting the signs of dementia

How noticing the changes in my father taught me the importance of early action, patience, and love

I don’t understand people who don’t talk or see their parents often. Unless they have done something to ruin your lives or you had a traumatic childhood, there is no reason you shouldn’t be checking in with them at least every few days if you don’t live with them.

Keep ReadingShow less