Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

‘Pakistan army is the problem’

Military chief accused of sowing divisions as Kashmir attack strains bilateral relations

‘Pakistan army is the problem’

An Indian paramilitary serviceman keeps watch in Pahalgam last Wednesday (23)

THE year is 2025, 78 years after the creation of Pakistan as a homeland for Muslims, as imagined by Muhammad Ali Jinnah for those who did not wish to remain behind in India. Given its rich resources and the fertile fields of the Punjab, Pakistan should today be one of Asia’s richest economies, possibly even ahead of India.

Take the example of Sir Anwar Pervez, founder of the Bestway group, who is probably the most respected Pakistani-origin entrepreneur in the UK. There should be many people like him in Pakistan.


Why hasn’t this happened?

The truth is Pakistan is not going to progress so long as the army is in charge. And the tentacles of the army reach deep into Pakistani society.

And to justify its existence, the army has to hold up India as the arch enemy. Anyone can see the status of Kashmir is not going to change. Nevertheless, the Pakistan army chief, General Asim Munir, told a conclave of overseas Pakistanis in Islamabad earlier this month that the country would continue to stand by the Kashmiri people in the “struggle against the Indian occupation”.

“It was our jugular vein, it is our jugular vein, we will not forget it,” he said.

In the same address, the general called upon the people of the country to tell stories to children so that they don’t forget they are “different from Hindus”.

In my experience, Indians and Pakistanis, Hindus and Muslims, get along pretty well in the UK. I know of several happy marriages. I like to think that, as human beings, we are not that different.

The general wants children to grow up drinking hatred of India and Hindus with their mother’s milk.

“You have to tell Pakistan’s story to your children so that they don’t forget that our forefathers thought we were different from Hindus in every possible aspect of life.”

President Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (centre) shakes hands with India’s prime minister Indira Gandhi in 1972 in Shimla, as his daughter Benazir Bhutto looks on

Shortly afterwards, on April 22, four gunmen emerged from thick forests and indiscriminately killed 26 people – mostly tourists from outside Kashmir – at a beauty spot near the resort town of Pahalgam. Three dozen others were injured.

If the aim was to disrupt the flourishing tourist economy, the assailants have certainly succeeded. There have been 80 per cent cancellations of hotel and houseboat bookings, so local people will suffer.

Rang De Basanti actor Atul Kulkarni visited Pahalgam after the attacks and shared a picture of a virtually empty Mumbai-Srinagar flight.

“Crew said these (previously) ran full,” he wrote in a post on X. “We need to fill them again.”

It will be a while before families feel confident enough to return.

Who were the gunmen and where did they come from?

We don’t know, since they have melted away. We have seen in numerous attacks in the West that even a lone gunman can cause havoc. But we can judge from the Mumbai massacre of 2008, when 10 young men came from Pakistan and carried out a vicious slaughter in India’s commercial capital. They were probably trained by elements within the Pakistani intelligence services. The same thing may have happened again.

But the connection between these groups and the authorities is nebulous.

Pakistan is ill-served by a certain brand of bellicose politician. Following India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari declared “either our water will flow or their blood will flow”.

He is a bit of a feral kid from a dysfunctional family which has seen more than its share of spilt blood. His grandfather, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, said, “Thank god, Pakistan is saved,” after the West Pakistan army carried out a genocide in East Pakistan in 1971.

In 1979, he was hanged by the military dictator, General Zia-ul-Haq, who was himself blown up by his own people in a Hercules aircraft in 1988.

Bilawal’s mother, Benazir Bhutto, was assassinated in 2007 in Rawalpindi. It is alleged that Benazir had her brother, Murtaza Bhutto, who was emerging as a political rival, gunned down in the streets of Karachi in 1996. At least, that is what Murtaza’s daughter, Fatima Bhutto, claimed in her book, Songs Of Blood And Sword: A Daughter’s Memoir.

Bilawal, whose father Asif Ali Zardari was president of Pakistan, has added Bhutto to his surname in an attempt to benefit from the family’s political legacy.

A photograph of General Asim Munir

But he is a brash boy, who probably does not understand what war means.

He was slapped down by a senior Muslim leader in India. Asaduddin Owaisi, who heads the All India Majlise-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM), said: “Don’t say childish things. His mother was killed by their homegrown terrorists. Does he even know what he is saying?”

The Indian author and Congress MP, Shashi Tharoor, added his voice: “The Pakistanis have to understand that they simply cannot kill Indians with impunity. We have no designs on Pakistan, but if they do something, they must be prepared for a response. If blood is going to flow, it will possibly flow more on their side than ours.”

While I was in India recently, I don’t think Pakistan cropped up even once in conversations. Most people just want to get on with achieving a better standard of living. If things had gone right, the two countries would have settled down to a relationship between friendly neighbours. Bilateral trade would have added to prosperity on both sides of the border. Today, India refuses to travel to Pakistan to play cricket.

Instead, nearly eight decades after Partition, there is talk one again of military conflict.

India’s prime minister, Narendra Modi, said his government will “identify, track and punish every terrorist and their backers. We will pursue them to the ends of the earth. Terrorism will not go unpunished. Every effort will be made to ensure that justice is done.”

Bilawal Bhutto Zardari

Pakistan’s prime minister Shehbaz Sharif responded: “The recent tragedy in Pahalgam is yet another example of this perpetual blame game, which must come to a grinding halt. Continuing with its role as a responsible country, Pakistan is open to participating in any neutral, transparent and credible investigation.”

He also said: “Water is a vital national interest of Pakistan, our lifeline…. Let there be no doubt at all its availability will be safeguarded at all costs and under all circumstances.

“Therefore, any attempt to stop, reduce or divert the flow of water belonging to Pakistan under the Indus Waters Treaty would be responded to with full force and might. Nobody should remain under any kind of false impression and confusion.

He added: “As founder of the nation, Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah rightly said, Kashmir is the jugular vein of Pakistan. Unfortunately, this globally recognised dispute remains unresolved despite multiple UN resolutions.

“Let there be no doubt, Pakistan shall continue to support the right of self-determination of the Kashmiri people till they achieve their rights through their great struggle and sacrifices.”

Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani high commissioner in London, said: “The notion of limited war waged under the nuclear threshold is fraught with untold risks. Such a scenario should be avoided at all costs. Even though there is little appetite for this by the Indian side, a backchannel must be re-established without delay to avoid any miscalculation, manage the crisis and prevent it from spinning out of control. The alternative is too terrifying to contemplate.”

Fatima Bhutto

In London a Pakistani diplomat was caught on camera making a threatening throat-slitting gesture towards the Indian protesters from the balcony of the high commission building in central London. He should be recalled immediately.

And an Indian origin man, Ankit Love, 41, was arrested and charged with smashing the windows of the Pakistani diplomatic mission.

These are just the kind of events that must be avoided.

The underlying problem remains unchanged. How do the people of Pakistan escape the clutches of the army?

More For You

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn

Getty Images

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

It is a truth universally acknowledged that voters are dissatisfied with the political choices on offer - so must they be in want of new parties too? A proliferation of start-ups showed how tricky political match-making can be. Zarah Sultana took Jeremy Corbyn by surprise by announcing they will co-lead a new left party. Two of Nigel Farage’s exes announced separate political initiatives to challenge Reform from its right, with the leader of London’s Conservatives lending her voice to Rupert Lowe’s revival of the politics of repatriation.

Corbyn and Sultana are from different generations. He had been an MP for a decade by the time she was born. For Sultana’s allies, this intergenerational element is a core case for the joint leadership. But the communications clash suggests friction ahead. After his allies could not persuade Sultana to retract her announcement, Corbyn welcomed her decision to leave Labour, saying ‘negotiations continue’ over the structure and leadership of a new party. It will seek to link MPs elected as pro-Gaza independents with other strands of the left outside Labour.

Keep ReadingShow less
Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

Amol Rajan at Prayagraj

Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

ONE reason I watched the BBC documentary Amol Rajan Goes to the Ganges with particular interest was because I have been wondering what to do with the ashes of my uncle, who died in August last year. His funeral, like that of his wife, was half Christian and half Hindu, as he had wished. But he left no instructions about his ashes.

Sooner or later, this is a question that every Hindu family in the UK will have to face, since it has been more than half a century since the first generation of Indian immigrants began arriving in this country. Amol admits he found it difficult to cope with the loss of his father, who died aged 76 three years ago. His ashes were scattered in the Thames.

Keep ReadingShow less
One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less