REGARDED as a wily cricket captain during his playing days, Pakistan prime minister Imran Khan appeared on Sunday (3) to have stumped his political opposition as well.
The country's president dissolved the national assembly just hours after the deputy speaker declined to accept a no-confidence motion that would likely have seen Khan booted from office, meaning the country will go to the polls within 90 days.
Whether he gets a second innings remains to be seen.
Khan enjoyed genuine popular support when he became premier in 2018, but critics say he has failed to deliver on promises to revitalise the economy and improve the plight of the poor.
The 69-year-old's Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party was voted in by millions who grew up watching him play cricket, where he excelled as an all-rounder and led the nation to World Cup victory in 1992.
The PTI overturned decades of dominance by the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) and Pakistan Muslim League-N (PML-N) - two usually feuding groups that have now joined forces to oust him.
Khan's vision was for Pakistan to become a welfare state modelled on the Islamic golden age of the seventh to 14th centuries, a period of cultural, economic and scientific flourishing in the Muslim world.
But he has made little headway in improving Pakistan's financial situation, with galloping inflation, crippling debt and a feeble rupee undermining economic reform.
A deteriorating security situation, particularly since the Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan last year, has also happened on his watch.
Tiptoed into politics
The Oxford-educated son of a wealthy Lahore family, Khan had a reputation as a playboy until his retirement from international cricket.
For years he busied himself with charity projects, raising millions to build a cancer hospital to honour his mother.
He tiptoed into politics and for years held the PTI's only parliamentary seat.
But the party grew hugely during the military-led government of General Pervez Musharraf, becoming a genuine force in the 2013 elections before winning bigger five years later.
Running the country proved more difficult than sitting in opposition, however.
Double-digit inflation has driven up the cost of basic goods, and while the economy is forecast to grow four per cent this year, it has been stagnant for the last three.
Pakistan has also had to borrow heavily just to service nearly $130 billion (£99.13 bn) of foreign debt.
The increasingly volatile security situation exemplified by the Taliban's return to power across the border in mid-August has also contributed to Khan's downfall.
The hardline Islamists' victory was initially seen as a victory, both for Pakistan - long accused of supporting them - as well as for a prime minister dubbed "Taliban Khan" for his consistent advocacy of dialogue and criticism of US policy towards Kabul.
But attacks by Pakistan's own Taliban - as well as the local Daesh group and Baluch separatists - have increased despite Kabul's assurances that Afghan soil would not be used for such purposes.
Pakistan's army is key to political power, and some analysts say Khan lost its crucial support - claims both sides deny. Certainly, he could not have pulled off Sunday's manoeuvre without the military's knowledge, or support.
Closer to China, Russia
Khan's efforts to position Pakistan as a key non-aligned regional player have not been successful either.
Ties with the United States have frayed, with Khan accusing Washington of working with the opposition for regime change.
Islamabad has moved closer to China, even though the important work on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has slowed down.
He has also moved closer to Russia, angering the West by continuing a visit to Moscow on the same day as the invasion of Ukraine.
Khan did have some domestic successes.
He is credited with bringing Pakistan relatively unscathed through the global Covid-19 pandemic, and a free universal health scheme he pioneered is slowly being rolled out across the country.
Khan frequently rails against Western permissiveness, sparking outrage among rights groups by repeatedly linking rape to the way women dress in a country where sexual violence is widespread.
Married three times, his current wife Bushra Bibi comes from a conservative family and wears a veil in public.
Often described as being impulsive and brash, he draws frequently on cricket analogies to describe his political battles.
"I fight till the very last ball. I never quit whatever the result may be," he said in an address to the nation last week.
(AFP)
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You

King Charles gives a speech at an official dinner and reception during the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM), on November 3, 2026 in St John's, Antigua and Barbuda.
Getty Images
King Charles condemns slavery at Commonwealth summit as UK edges towards formal apology
Nov 04, 2026
- King Charles calls slavery “a monstrous injustice” at Commonwealth summit
- Andy Burnham discusses a possible apology with Caribbean leaders
- BBC reports a UK apology is likely during the G20 presidency next year
- Burnham rules out reparations but offers debt relief and £40 million
KING CHARLES has described the transatlantic slave trade as “a monstrous injustice”, opening a Commonwealth summit at which Prime Minister Andy Burnham is discussing a possible formal apology for Britain’s role in slavery.
Addressing the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Antigua and Barbuda on Tuesday, the King said slavery “still casts a shadow over these islands and other members” of the 56-nation group.
“As I have said before, that shameful chapter of history is one that fills my heart with horror and my soul with the most profound personal sorrow,” he said.
We cannot change the past, but we can choose how to live with It
“And yet history also teaches us that evil need not have the last word; that character and courage can combine to overcome the most monstrous injustice.”
The King, who is politically neutral, was not expected to apologise. The palace said it would not be appropriate for him to announce a change in government policy.
Burnham’s talks
Burnham, who said at the weekend that he was open to a formal apology, discussed the issue with Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley on Monday. Downing Street said they discussed how Britain was offering “a structured dialogue for communities impacted by the transatlantic slave trade”.
The BBC reported on Tuesday that Britain was likely to apologise during its G20 presidency next year.
But Burnham has ruled out reparations, demanded by several Caribbean countries.
“I’ve been very clear that we do not support reparations... but it’s not the case that we don’t support countries in the Commonwealth around development helping them with debt issues that they’ve got,” he told reporters.
Burnham rejects slavery payouts but leaves door open to apology
Instead, the UK is pursuing a debt reset plan for the poorest Commonwealth countries, led by former prime minister Gordon Brown, and will provide £40 million over three years for Caribbean infrastructure, including renewable energy.
A long-running strain
Between 10 and 15 million enslaved Africans were taken to the Americas over four centuries. Britain profited from the trade for centuries but argues it led the way in abolishing it, passing a law in 1833 to end slavery across most of its empire.
Britain has never formally apologised or agreed to pay reparations. At the last Commonwealth summit in Samoa in 2024, leaders backed talks on reparatory justice after then prime minister Keir Starmer tried to avoid the issue.
Protesters in the Bahamas held placards reading “Pay what you owe us” when the King arrived last week at the start of his nine-day Caribbean tour.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has said Britain should not apologise, arguing that it would strengthen claims for financial compensation.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Most Popular
News
Study attributes decline in academic freedom to restriction of free speech
Vibhuti Pathak
05 April 2024












