PAKISTAN’S Army has said it has "nothing to do with politics" as it asserted that its chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa will retire on November 29 "no matter what."
Amidst a vicious social media campaign against the powerful "establishment" for not backing former prime minister Imran Khan, military spokesman major general Babar Iftikhar said that Pakistan's survival “lies solely on democracy” and its strength lies in the institutions, be it Parliament, Supreme Court or the Armed forces.
The Pakistan Army has "nothing to do with politics" and the institution has decided to remain apolitical in the future as well, he told a press conference on Thursday (14), three days after opposition leader Shehbaz Sharif was sworn in as the new prime minister.
Khan, who came to power in 2018, reportedly with the backing of the military, became the first Pakistan prime minister who was defeated in a no-confidence vote in the National Assembly earlier this month.
Iftikhar confirmed that Khan had approached the army chief to find a solution to the political crisis.
"It is unfortunate that our political leadership was not ready to talk. So the army chief and DG ISI went to the PM Office and three scenarios were discussed," he said, recalling that one was that the no-confidence motion should be held as it was. The others were that the prime minister would resign or the no-confidence motion was retracted and the assemblies were dissolved.
Iftikhar rejected the rumours circulating on social media about the establishment meeting the opposition parties. "There is no truth to this," he asserted.
He clarified that General Bajwa was "unwell" on the day Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) president Sharif took office and had to skip the oath-taking ceremony on Monday (11).
Iftikhar also announced that General Bajwa, 61, will retire this year.
"Let me put this to rest. The chief of army staff is neither seeking an extension nor will he accept an extension. No matter what, he will be retiring on the 29th of November 2022," he said.
General Bajwa, who was appointed by then prime minister Nawaz Sharif in 2016, was granted an extension in August 2019 by the Khan government.
Iftikhar rubbished the rumours about the threat of martial law at the height of the recent political turmoil.
"There will never be martial law in Pakistan."
To a question about the opening of courts in the middle of the night when the battle for the no-confidence vote was going on, he said that it was a decision by the courts and the army had nothing to do with it.
The powerful army, which has ruled the coup-prone country for more than half of its 73 plus years of existence, has wielded considerable power in the matters of security and foreign policy.
Khan, who was ousted from power on Sunday (10), had apparently also lost the support of the Army after he refused to endorse the appointment of the ISI spy agency chief last year. Finally, he agreed but it soured his ties with the Army.
In response to a question, the spokesman said that the army was on board with the visit of Khan to Russia. But termed it embarrassing when Russia launched an attack on Ukraine when Khan was in Moscow. The spokesman said that the United States had not asked Pakistan to provide army bases after withdrawing from Afghanistan.
"But if the US had asked for the bases, the army's response would have been the same as that of PM Khan,” he said.
(PTI)
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You
Humza Yousaf says he dropped Elon Musk defamation case to avoid distraction
Sep 27, 2026
HUMZA YOUSAF has revealed that he considered suing Elon Musk for defamation after the US billionaire called him a “blatant racist”, but decided against legal action because he feared a court battle would become a distraction from his work as Scotland’s first minister.
Yousaf disclosed the details in his forthcoming book Under Fire, an extract of which was published by The Sunday Times (27).
According to the newspaper, Yousaf discussed the possibility of taking legal action with his lawyer Aamer Anwar after Musk attacked him on X, in October 2023. Senior counsel was then consulted and, Yousaf said, advised that there was a potential case.
However, he decided not to proceed.
“It was pretty clear there was a case there, but it would be an absolute distraction from the job I had to do as first minister,” Yousaf told the Times.
He said a legal dispute could also have given Musk and his views further attention.
Musk attack came during Gaza crisis
The exchange took place at a particularly difficult period for Yousaf, whose wife Nadia’s parents were trapped in Gaza following the October 7 attacks on Israel.
Yousaf wrote that his chief of staff, Colin McAllister, contacted him while Nadia was deeply worried about her parents during a communications blackout in Gaza.
McAllister told him that Musk had posted a video of a speech Yousaf had delivered at Holyrood in 2020, during the Black Lives Matter protests, and described him as a “blatant racist”.
In the speech, Yousaf had highlighted what he described as the dominance of white people in senior positions across Scottish public life.
Yousaf initially responded on social media with a humorous GIF from the Scottish sitcom Still Game. But he said Musk’s post was followed by a large volume of racist abuse directed at him.
He recalled receiving comments telling him to return to Pakistan and other messages containing threats.
The dispute did not end with Musk’s initial attack. The billionaire later described Yousaf as a “super racist scumbag” and accused him of disliking white people.
Yousaf says legal battle would have dragged on
Yousaf said he remained angry about Musk’s intervention but ultimately decided that taking him to court was not worth the disruption.
“Without a doubt, there was at least a case,” he said, while acknowledging that defamation proceedings can have uncertain outcomes because of the importance of freedom of expression.
“But I think it would have just dragged on and been a saga and distraction that I didn’t require,” he said.
Musk subsequently challenged Yousaf to sue him. In 2024, he responded to reports of possible legal action by writing “go ahead, make my day”.
Yousaf later described Musk as “one of the most dangerous men on the planet” and accused him of using his influence to fuel divisions in Europe.
Book looks beyond the Musk dispute
The former first minister's book also examines his time in office, including the experience of having his parents-in-law trapped in Gaza.
Elizabeth El-Nakla and Maged El-Nakla eventually escaped after spending about four weeks in the territory. Yousaf has said that there were several occasions when he and his wife feared they had been killed.
According to the Sunday Times, Yousaf remains supportive of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, although he believes the prospects of achieving one are diminishing.
He also defended his government's decision to introduce a 48p top rate of income tax in Scotland from April 2024, despite subsequent analysis suggesting that changes in taxpayer behaviour could have reduced the additional revenue generated.
Yousaf said decisions on taxation had to be based on the evidence available to ministers at the time and maintained that those earning the most should contribute more.
The former SNP leader stepped down as first minister in 2024 and later left frontline Holyrood politics. Under Fire is due to be formally published next week.
Keep ReadingShow less








