Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Welfare system too costly, needs reform: Rachel Reeves

Economic challenges, including global uncertainty over US tariffs and the war in Ukraine, have affected the UK's finances, reducing the Labour government's £9.9 billion fiscal cushion.

Rachel-Reeves-Getty

Reeves is expected to announce welfare spending cuts worth billions of pounds in the Labour government's Spring Statement on March 26. (Photo: Getty Images)

CHANCELLOR Rachel Reeves said on Friday that the UK’s welfare system is "costing too much" and must be reformed as the government faces financial pressures from high inflation and borrowing.

Reeves is expected to announce welfare spending cuts worth billions of pounds in the Labour government's Spring Statement on March 26. The statement will be a follow-up to her first budget last October, according to reports this week.


Economic challenges, including global uncertainty over US tariffs and the war in Ukraine, have affected the UK's finances, reducing the Labour government's £9.9 billion fiscal cushion.

"We've got to reform our welfare system, because at the moment, it's letting down taxpayers because it's costing too much," Reeves said on Sky News' Electoral Dysfunction podcast.

She added that the system is "letting down our economy" and leaves people "trapped on benefits, rather than actively supported back into work."

"We need to get better value for money for what taxpayers put in," she said.

The Financial Times reported on Friday that the Treasury is considering cutting funding for GB Energy, Labour's green energy infrastructure project, to reduce costs. The initiative was launched after the party's general election victory last July.

The government had allocated £8.3 bn over five years as part of prime minister Keir Starmer’s plan to meet Britain’s climate targets.

"We are fully committed to GB Energy, which is at the heart of our mission to make Britain a clean energy superpower and to ensure homes are cheaper and cleaner to run," a government spokesperson told AFP in response to the FT report.

Reeves faces challenges in meeting her own fiscal rules, which prevent borrowing for day-to-day spending. The rules are aimed at maintaining financial market confidence in government spending plans.

While cutting costs, Starmer last week pledged to increase UK defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027. The decision comes amid concerns over the United States’ commitment to Ukraine and NATO.

(With inputs from AFP)

More For You

pub hotels UK

The group earned five stars for customer service and accuracy of descriptions.

coachinginngroup

Pub hotel group beat luxury chains in UK guest satisfaction survey

Highlights

  • Coaching Inn Group scores 81 per cent customer satisfaction, beating Marriott and Hilton.
  • Wetherspoon Hotels named best value at £70 per night.
  • Britannia Hotels ranks bottom for 12th consecutive year with 44 per cent score.
A traditional pub hotel group has outperformed luxury international chains in the UK's largest guest satisfaction survey, while one major operator continues its decade-long streak at the bottom of the rankings.
The Coaching Inn Group, comprising 36 relaxed inn-style hotels in historic buildings across beauty spots and market towns, achieved the highest customer score of 81per cent among large chains in Which?'s annual hotel survey. The group earned five stars for customer service and accuracy of descriptions, with guests praising its "lovely locations and excellent food and service.
"The survey, conducted amongst 4,631 guests, asked respondents to rate their stays across eight categories including cleanliness, customer service, breakfast quality, bed comfort and value for money. At an average £128 per night, Coaching Inn demonstrated that mid-range pricing with consistent quality appeals to British travellers.
J D Wetherspoon Hotels claimed both the Which? Recommended Provider status (WRPs) and Great Value badge for the first time, offering rooms at just £70 per night while maintaining four-star ratings across most categories. Guests described their stays as "clean, comfortable and good value.
"Among boutique chains, Hotel Indigo scored 79 per cent with its neighbourhood-inspired design, while InterContinental achieved 80per cent despite charging over £300 per night, and the chain missed WRP status for this reason.

Budget brands decline

However, Premier Inn, long considered Britain's reliable budget choice, lost its recommended status this year. Despite maintaining comfortable beds, guests reported "standards were slipping" and prices "no longer budget levels" at an average £94 per night.

The survey's biggest disappointment remains Britannia Hotels, scoring just 44 per cent and one star for bedroom and bathroom quality. This marks twelve consecutive years at the bottom, with guests at properties like Folkestone's Grand Burstin calling it a total dive.

Keep ReadingShow less