Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Southport stabbings probe examines institutional failings

Rudakubana had repeated contact with the police, courts and welfare services as well as the government’s counter-terror programme Prevent, but all failed to spot the risk he posed.

Southport

A vigil held in Southport after the fatal stabbings last year.

Getty Images

A TWO-PHASE public inquiry began on Monday (7) into the killing of three girls in Southport last year, which triggered Britain’s worst riots in decades.

Bebe King, aged six, Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and nineyear-old Alice da Silva Aguiar died in the stabbing spree at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class.


Axel Rudakubana, now 18, also attempted to kill eight other children and two adults.

He was jailed in January for a minimum of 52 years.

Launching the probe, home secretary Yvette Cooper said the first phase would “thoroughly investigate” the circumstances of the July 29 attack in the northwestern seaside town, including Rudakubana’s multiple interactions with public authorities.

Rudakubana had repeated contact with the police, courts and welfare services as well as the government’s counter-terror programme Prevent, but all failed to spot the risk he posed.

The second phase would examine the wider issue of young people being drawn towards extreme violence.

“We owe it to their families, and all those affected to quickly understand what went wrong, answer difficult questions and do everything in our power to prevent something like this from happening again,” Cooper said, describing the murders as an “unimaginable tragedy”.

After his arrest, police found violent content on Rudakubana’s devices including images of dead bodies, victims of torture, beheadings, and cartoons depicting violence and rape.

The probe, with legal powers to compel witnesses to give evidence, will be chaired by retired senior judge Adrian Fulford.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

UK Disposable Vape Ban

Researchers found that AI bots submitted more than 90,000 responses to a UK government consultation on disposable vape restrictions

Getty Images

AI bots generated 76% of responses to UK disposable vape consultation

  • The Department of Health and Social Care identified 90,835 of 118,756 submissions as fraudulent
  • After automated responses were excluded, 79.6 per cent of valid respondents supported restrictions on disposable vape sales
  • Researchers warn increasingly sophisticated bots could threaten the integrity of future public consultations

Artificial intelligence bots generated more than three-quarters of responses to a UK government consultation on tobacco and vaping restrictions, in what researchers describe as the first documented instance of large-scale automated interference in a formal public health consultation.

A study published in the journal Tobacco Control found that 90,835 of the 118,756 submissions received during the 2023 consultation on the Tobacco and Vapes Bill were identified as fraudulent by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC).

Keep ReadingShow less