Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Police can now remove coats and conduct mouth searches on illegal migrants

New legislation allows officers to search for mobile phones and SIM cards to gather intelligence on smuggling gangs

Police

Previously, mobile phone searches were only possible after a migrant's arrest

Getty Images

Highlights

  • Police can now require migrants to remove coats and undergo mouth searches for devices.
  • Government aims to dismantle criminal gangs behind record Channel crossings.
  • Rights groups condemn measures as "dystopian act of brutality" against traumatised people.
Police in Britain will be able to require illegal migrants to remove their coats and allow mouth searches at ports to look for mobile phones or SIM cards, the government announced on Monday.

The Home Office said the new powers would support investigations aimed at dismantling criminal gangs suspected of smuggling migrants across the Channel, which have reached record levels this year.

Officers can make migrants remove coats, jackets, or gloves to search for devices and may inspect mouths for concealed SIM cards or small electronics. The measures are designed to gather intelligence on migrants' journeys and the smuggling networks facilitating them.


The government explained that criminal gangs frequently use phone contacts and social media to recruit migrants for small-boat crossings from France. Previously, mobile phone searches were only possible after a migrant's arrest, but the new powers will allow officers to collect information faster.

Backlash from advocates

The law is expected to receive Royal Assent in the coming days and reflects the Labour government's hardening stance on immigration, particularly illegal immigration.

The tougher approach comes as the government attempts to counter the soaring popularity of the populist Reform UK party, which has driven the immigration agenda. Home secretary Shabana Mahmood's department emphasised that the powers would strengthen efforts to combat people-smuggling operations.

However, the measures have drawn sharp criticism from rights groups. Sile Reynolds, Head of Asylum Advocacy at Freedom from Torture, condemned the policy, stating "Using invasive powers to search through the clothing - and even inside the mouths - of desperate and traumatised people when they have just survived a terrifying journey across the Channel is a dystopian act of brutality."

Rights organisations argue that such policies scapegoat migrants and fuel racism and violence. Over the summer, protests took place outside hotels housing asylum seekers at public expense.

Polls suggest immigration has overtaken the economy as British voters' top concern, placing pressure on the government to demonstrate action on the issue.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

UK Disposable Vape Ban

Researchers found that AI bots submitted more than 90,000 responses to a UK government consultation on disposable vape restrictions

Getty Images

AI bots generated 76% of responses to UK disposable vape consultation

  • The Department of Health and Social Care identified 90,835 of 118,756 submissions as fraudulent
  • After automated responses were excluded, 79.6 per cent of valid respondents supported restrictions on disposable vape sales
  • Researchers warn increasingly sophisticated bots could threaten the integrity of future public consultations

Artificial intelligence bots generated more than three-quarters of responses to a UK government consultation on tobacco and vaping restrictions, in what researchers describe as the first documented instance of large-scale automated interference in a formal public health consultation.

A study published in the journal Tobacco Control found that 90,835 of the 118,756 submissions received during the 2023 consultation on the Tobacco and Vapes Bill were identified as fraudulent by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC).

Keep ReadingShow less