Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

Isolating terror groups

by Amit Roy

NEWSPAPERS in India appear to agree that prime minister Narendra Modi has not had a


good war. How this will influence the country’s imminent general election remains to be

seen. He himself appeared to concede that things could have gone better.

“Today, the lack of Rafale is being felt,” he said. “The country is saying in one voice that had we had the Rafale (fighter jets) now, what all could have happened? Putting self-interest and politics before Rafale has seriously hurt the nation.”

Commentators in India are saying in marked contrast, Pakistan’s prime minister Imran Khan has appeared statesmanlike after returning the captured Indian pilot, Abhinandan Varthaman.

For the time being it looks as though the passion for military strikes and counter-strikes has cooled somewhat, although there is still heavy shelling on the border. The underlying issues between the two countries cannot be resolved so long as the army effectively runs Pakistan.

It needs to hold India as “the enemy” if it is to justify its existence. To be sure, there is a civilian government in place, but Imran’s room for manoeuvre is limited by his military masters.

It is claimed that the Pakistani army once used jihadi groups to mount or assist with terrorist attacks in Kashmir, but no longer does so.

India could easily have gone to war in 2008 after the Mumbai massacre, but Manmohan

Singh, then prime minister, exercised restraint.

But in the run-up to a general election, Modi felt he had to act in response to the suicide bombing in Kashmir in which more than 40 Indian para-military were killed. To that extent, the terrorists have achieved their aim by bringing the two countries to the verge of full-scale war. In time of conflict, nationalistic sentiment is aroused on both sides.

The mistake Indians make is in seeing all Pakistan as a monolithic structure. It would do

better to win over moderate Pakistanis – they constitute the majority, I think – and isolate

those who want to make mischief.

Pakistan insists Kashmir is a “core issue”. However, hard this might be, it should put Kashmir to one side and increase trade with India so as to improve life for ordinary Pakistanis.

War would be disastrous for both sides, but this is what the militant groups, such as Jaish-e-Mohammed – it claimed responsibility for the suicide attack in Kashmir – want.

More For You

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less
If ayatollahs fall, who will run Teheran next?

Portraits of Iranian military generals and nuclear scientists, killed in Israel’s last Friday (13) attack, are seen above a road, as heavy smoke rises from an oil refinery in southern Teheran hit in an overnight Israeli strike last Sunday (15)

If ayatollahs fall, who will run Teheran next?

THERE is one question to which none of us has the answer: if the ayatollahs are toppled, who will take over in Teheran?

I am surprised that Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei, has lasted as long as he has. He is 86, and would achieve immortality as a “martyr” in the eyes of regime supporters if the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, succeeded in assassinating him. This was apparently Netanyahu’s plan, though he was apparently dissuaded by US president Donald Trump from going ahead with the killing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Talking about race isn’t racist – ignoring it helped grooming gangs thrive

A woman poses with a sign as members of the public queue to enter a council meeting during a protest calling for justice for victims of sexual abuse and grooming gangs, outside the council offices at City Centre on January 20, 2025 in Oldham, England

Getty Images

Comment: Talking about race isn’t racist – ignoring it helped grooming gangs thrive

WAS a national inquiry needed into so-called grooming gangs? Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer did not think so in January, but now accepts Dame Louise Casey’s recommendation to commission one.

The previous Conservative government – having held a seven-year national inquiry into child sexual abuse – started loudly championing a new national inquiry once it lost the power to call one. Casey explains why she changed her mind too after her four-month, rapid audit into actions taken and missed on group-based exploitation and abuse. A headline Casey theme is the ‘shying away’ from race.

Keep ReadingShow less