Gayathri Kallukaran is a Junior Journalist with Eastern Eye. She has a Master’s degree in Journalism and Mass Communication from St. Paul’s College, Bengaluru, and brings over five years of experience in content creation, including two years in digital journalism. She covers stories across culture, lifestyle, travel, health, and technology, with a creative yet fact-driven approach to reporting. Known for her sensitivity towards human interest narratives, Gayathri’s storytelling often aims to inform, inspire, and empower. Her journey began as a layout designer and reporter for her college’s daily newsletter, where she also contributed short films and editorial features. Since then, she has worked with platforms like FWD Media, Pepper Content, and Petrons.com, where several of her interviews and features have gained spotlight recognition. Fluent in English, Malayalam, Tamil, and Hindi, she writes in English and Malayalam, continuing to explore inclusive, people-focused storytelling in the digital space.
Commuters in parts of Britain are being warned to prepare for travel delays this morning due to dense fog affecting roads and transport networks. The Met Office has issued a yellow weather warning, cautioning drivers and passengers in several regions to expect challenging conditions.
The warning applies to eastern and western England, including the East Midlands, the East of England, the North East, the North West, and Yorkshire and Humber. The fog, which is expected to be particularly thick in some areas, could lead to reduced visibility and cause travel disruptions throughout the morning.
According to the Met Office, visibility in certain areas may drop to less than 100 metres (328 feet), significantly impacting drivers’ ability to see ahead. This poses a risk for commuters travelling by car, as well as those using buses, trains, and other forms of transport. The fog could also affect air travel, with the potential for flight delays or cancellations, especially in areas close to airports.
The national forecaster explained that while the fog will begin to lift and clear as the morning progresses, it may cause delays during peak travel hours. Commuters are encouraged to plan ahead and allow extra time for their journeys. The Met Office has advised people to check road conditions before setting off and, where possible, consider adjusting their travel plans to avoid peak foggy periods.
In a statement, the Met Office said: "Fog will be dense in places and may lead to some travel delays, including delays to journey times and slower bus and train services." Drivers are reminded to familiarise themselves with the use of fog lights and to ensure they are functioning correctly before beginning their journey.
In addition to advising road users, the Met Office also issued a warning to those using public transport. "Bus and train services, as well as flights and ferry travel, may also be affected," the Met Office stated. They encouraged passengers to check for updates from their travel providers and to follow any guidance offered.
The dense fog warning falls under the Met Office’s yellow category, which is used to highlight conditions that could cause some level of disruption but are not considered life-threatening. However, travellers are urged to stay updated with the latest weather reports, as weather warnings can change quickly.
In a separate post, the forecaster stressed the dangers of driving in foggy conditions. "Travelling in fog can be extremely dangerous," the Met Office said, "as fog can drift rapidly and is often patchy." The statement added that dense fog warnings are typically issued when visibility is expected to drop below 200 metres. Transport disruption becomes more severe when visibility falls to less than 50 metres.
For those needing to travel, the Met Office has provided several safety tips, including:
Avoid travel if possible.
Drive slowly with dipped headlights, as full beams can reflect off the fog, creating a ‘white wall’ effect.
Be mindful of your speed, as fog can give the illusion that you are moving slower than you are.
Use fog lights when necessary, but switch them off when visibility improves.
Avoid following too closely behind other vehicles, as rear lights can give a false sense of security.
Be aware of freezing fog, which can create icy conditions on roads and pavements.
As the fog begins to clear later in the day, normal travel conditions should resume. However, commuters are encouraged to remain cautious and to take the necessary precautions to stay safe during their journeys.
Charlie Kirk, 31, shot dead at Utah Valley University during a student event; shooter still at large.
FBI falsely announced an arrest, later retracting the claim, raising questions about investigation handling.
Retired Canadian Michael Mallinson wrongly accused online as the shooter; misinformation spread rapidly on social media.
Security at the event was minimal, with no bag checks.
The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk during a student event at Utah Valley University has left the nation shaken and investigators scrambling. The 31-year-old was fatally shot in the neck while answering questions under a campus tent, in what officials are calling a sniper-style attack. The shooter remains at large, and the aftermath has exposed investigative missteps, rampant misinformation, and a dangerous level of political vitriol that threatens to push an already polarised America closer to the edge.
Charlie Kirk shot dead at Utah Valley University Getty Images
Manhunt or mismanagement?
While Kirk’s body was still en route to the morgue, the FBI announced an arrest. FBI Director Kash Patel posted on X that a “subject” was in custody, then later wrote that the individual had been released after interrogation, statements that conflicted with those of other local officials and added to early confusion about whether a suspect was actually detained.
Within hours, the Bureau retracted the statement. No shooter was in custody. Instead, one man, George Zinn, had been detained and charged only with obstruction before being released; officials say he was not tied to the shooting. The actual assassin remained at large, likely dressed in dark clothing, armed with a rifle, and vanished from a rooftop roughly 137–183 metres from the stage. Authorities later said they recovered a bolt-action rifle believed to have been used.
This embarrassment for the agency came on the same day three former senior FBI officials filed a federal lawsuit alleging politically motivated firings and accusing leadership, including Director Kash Patel, of politicising bureau personnel decisions.
— (@)
Digital witch hunt
While investigators combed through footage and witness statements, the internet took matters into its own hands.
Michael Mallinson, a 77-year-old Canadian retiree, became the face of the assassination online after a fake Fox News account posted his photo alongside the caption: “This is the shooter.”
The post went viral. Thousands shared it. Hate poured in. Even automated tools and chatbots (including xAI’s Grok) echoed the false identification proving how AI and social platforms can amplify misinformation in real time.
Mallinson was nowhere near Utah. He had not left Toronto. On YouTube, creators used footage of Kirk’s killing as clickbait. On Telegram and fringe platforms, users celebrated his death.
Graphic footage circulated widely, reposted by some YouTube and TikTok channels and amplified on fringe and encrypted platforms, where pockets of users celebrated the killing. The assassination was not just a news event, it became content.
— (@)
Security failures laid bare
Kirk was a controversial figure. He knew it. His team knew it. Yet security at the event was shockingly lax. Students and attendees say no bag checks were conducted. While Kirk had private security alongside six university officers, the setup was more suited to crowd control than to the threat of a long-range attack. The shooter used that exposure to their advantage
The killing has reverberated far beyond Utah. Donald Trump called Kirk “legendary,” while Turning Point affiliates in the UK and Australia declared him a martyr. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán blamed “the international hate campaign of the liberal left,” while Italy’s Giorgia Meloni called it “a deep wound for democracy.”
This swift politicisation has in fact deepened divides, with experts warning that framing the death in martyrdom terms risks fuelling further violence.
— (@)
The human toll
Behind the politics, violence and digital noise remains the wreckage of a young family. His wife Erika now faces raising two children who were close enough to hear the shot that killed their father. Public figures offered condolences and leaders across the political spectrum described it as a tragedy and warned against political violence.
Charlie Kirk’s assassination is more than a criminal case. It is a failure of security, a test of law enforcement credibility, and a mirror held up to the toxic speed of misinformation. The shooter is still free, and the questions are multiplying about safety, accountability, and how political violence is inflamed.
Charlie Kirk stands in the back of the room as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a swearing in ceremonyGetty Images
The investigation will eventually name a suspect. But no arrest will erase the fact that a man was gunned down in front of his family, and that the aftermath, from false custody claims to viral lies, has made a fractured nation feel even more unstable. Not in abstract political terms, but in the daily lives of people who now fear rallies, campuses, and speech. That is the cost we can least afford to ignore.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
A 21-year-old transgender woman has been convicted of sexual assault in northeast England.
Ciara Watkin did not disclose her gender status before engaging in sexual activity with a male partner.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said the man could not give informed consent.
Watkin was found guilty on three charges at Teesside Crown Court.
Sentencing is scheduled for 10 October.
A transgender woman has been convicted of sexually assaulting a male partner after failing to disclose her gender status before sexual activity. Prosecutors argued that the man could not give informed consent, and the case has been described as having a significant impact on his mental wellbeing.
The case
Ciara Watkin, 21, from Stockton-on-Tees, met the man, also 21, on Snapchat in June 2022. She later engaged in sexual activity with him without revealing her gender status. During their first encounter, she told him she was on her period and could not be touched below the waist.
A few days later, they met again, after which Watkin blocked contact before later messaging him to disclose that she was transgender and had male genitalia.
Prosecution statement
Senior Crown Prosecutor Sarah Nelson said: “It is clear from the evidence in this case that, prior to engaging in sexual activity with the victim, Watkin had made no attempt to inform him of her transgender status. The victim has made clear in police interview that he would not have engaged in sexual activity had he known that Watkin was transgender and, consequently, these events have had a significant impact on his mental wellbeing.”
Defence argument
Watkin admitted lying about her gender status but denied wrongdoing. Her lawyers argued in court that it would have been “blindingly obvious” to the man that she was not biologically female, according to the BBC.
Verdict and sentencing
Following a trial at Teesside Crown Court, Watkin was convicted of two charges of sexual assault and one charge of assault by penetration. She will be sentenced on 10 October.
Keep ReadingShow less
The Rhode Island judge whose compassionate rulings made him a viral sensation
US judge and TV star Frank Caprio has died at the age of 88.
He was best known for his compassionate courtroom style on Caught in Providence.
Clips of his judgements went viral, earning billions of views online.
His family confirmed his death following a battle with pancreatic cancer.
Judge remembered for kindness and humour
Frank Caprio, the Rhode Island judge whose compassionate rulings made him a viral sensation, has died aged 88. His family confirmed he passed away following a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
Caprio, often described as the “nicest judge in the world”, presided over cases in Providence for more than 40 years before finding global fame on the hit television show Caught in Providence.
Viral fame through Caught in Providence
The courtroom series showcased Caprio’s trademark mix of empathy, humour and common sense. He often took into account the personal circumstances of defendants, creating memorable moments that resonated worldwide.
Clips of his rulings — from inviting children to sit with him on the bench to unveiling a “mini-judge” soft toy — racked up billions of views across TikTok, Instagram and YouTube. One short video of his morning routine alone was viewed more than five million times.
In a 2019 interview, Caprio said the programme offered “a slice of life of Rhode Island that is very interesting, and it reflects the same issues people are experiencing nationwide”.
Tributes and legacy
In a statement on his official Instagram account, where he had 3.4 million followers, Caprio was remembered for his “warmth, humour, and kindness” and for inspiring “countless acts of kindness”.
His son, David Caprio, thanked fans for their support and encouraged them to “spread a little kindness” in his father’s memory.
The show’s producers, Debmar-Mercury, paid tribute to his “unique brand of compassion and common sense approach”, adding: “We will miss him dearly.”
During its run, Caught in Providence was nominated for three Daytime Emmy Awards, with Caprio himself earning two nominations last year.
Personal life
Frank Caprio is survived by his wife of nearly 60 years, Joyce, as well as five children, seven grandchildren and two great-grandchildren.
He announced his cancer diagnosis in 2023, saying he was “fully prepared to fight as hard as I can”. In one of his final posts, he told followers he had returned to hospital after a setback in treatment, asking for their prayers.
Rapper Sean Kingston sentenced to three and a half years in US federal prison.
Fraud scheme, run with his mother, involved luxury goods worth more than £740,000.
Items included designer watches, furniture, a 232-inch LED TV and a bulletproof Cadillac Escalade.
Kingston apologised in court; his mother was jailed for five years in July.
Text messages showed the pair discussing fake payment receipts.
Conviction and sentencing
Rapper Sean Kingston has been sentenced to three and a half years in a US federal prison for his role in a fraud scheme worth over £740,000.
The Jamaican-American singer, whose real name is Kisean Anderson, was convicted earlier this year alongside his mother, Janice Turner, of wire fraud. Prosecutors said they exploited Kingston’s celebrity status to obtain luxury items without paying for them.
How the scheme worked
According to prosecutors, Kingston contacted victims via social media, claiming he wished to buy high-end products. He then invited them to his homes in South Florida, promising to promote their goods on his platforms or introduce them to other celebrities.
When payments were due, Kingston or his mother sent fraudulent wire transfer receipts. While some victims later received compensation after legal intervention or lawsuits, most were left out of pocket.
Evidence at trial
Prosecutors said the scheme netted more than £740,000 in goods, including luxury watches, furniture, a 232-inch LED television and a bulletproof Cadillac Escalade.
Text messages shown in court revealed Kingston instructing his mother: “I told you to make [a] fake receipt.”
Apology and defence
Before sentencing, Kingston apologised to the court and said he had learned from his actions. He will begin serving his sentence immediately.
His mother, Janice Turner, was jailed for five years in July.
Defence lawyer Zeljka Bozanic described Kingston as “a soft guy who grew up poor when he rose to fame overnight”, arguing he still had the mentality of a teenager and struggled to manage his finances.
Keep ReadingShow less
How Sydney Sweeney’s silent ad campaign became a Republican rally cry
Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle ad sparked backlash over a “genes/jeans” pun
Critics accused it of echoing eugenics and white supremacist rhetoric
Public records revealed Sweeney is a registered Republican
Donald Trump praised her and attacked Taylor Swift in the same post
American Eagle stock soared as the ad became a right-wing rallying point
Let’s be honest: no one expected a jeans ad to spiral into this. Not Sydney Sweeney, not American Eagle, and definitely not the internet and yet, here we are.
It started with a dumb pun. It exploded into a cultural war. Now it’s a headline-grabbing mess involving eugenics, Republicans, and Donald Trump shouting into Truth Social. Somehow, a 27-year-old actress became the poster girl for a movement she hasn’t even acknowledged.
Here’s how it all unravelled.
The controversial American Eagle ad featuring Sydney Sweeney in head-to-toe denim Instagram/americaneagle
1. The ad: A pun so bad, it started a fire
On 23 July, American Eagle dropped a denim ad with Sydney Sweeney, best known for Euphoria and The White Lotus. In the clip, she says:
“Genes are passed down from parents... My jeans are blue.”
It was supposed to be cheeky. It ended up setting X and TikTok on fire. Critics accused the ad of echoing white supremacist rhetoric, especially with a blue-eyed, blonde actress talking about “genes.” The line between “playful” and “problematic” blurred, fast. The internet saw something way darker and it was just getting started.
People didn’t hold back. Users called the ad tone-deaf, dog-whistling, and straight-up “eugenics-coded.” Words like “Aryan” and “racial superiority” were trending. Even though it was likely just a bad pun from an overconfident marketing team, the optics were bad. Really bad.
It reeked of eugenics (that vile, discredited pseudo-science about "superior" genetics). "Literal Nazi propaganda," some screamed. "Tone-deaf!" "Promoting racial superiority!"
Others scratched their heads: "It's just jeans, people! Lighten up!" Too late. The fuse was lit. The internet doesn’t do nuance.
3. The plot twist: Then, her political registration leaked
Soon after the outrage, someone dug up public records showing Sweeney registered as a Republican in Florida, just a month after Donald Trump’s criminal conviction.
This revived an earlier controversy. Remember 2022? Photos surfaced from her mum's party with guests wearing "Make Sixty Great Again" hats (a MAGA parody). Sweeney pleaded then: "Stop making assumptions... an innocent celebration."
With her Republican registration now public, assumptions came flooding back, and this time, they stuck.
Now? Crickets. Total, deafening silence from Sweeney.
Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle ad sparked backlash over a “genes/jeans” punInstagram/americaneagle
4. Enter Trump: "She's HOT! (And Republican!)"
On 3 August, a reporter told Trump about Sweeney’s political affiliation while he was boarding Air Force One. He lit up:
“She’s a Republican? Oh, now I love her ad!”
Two days later, he took to Truth Social with a post praising her, saying "Sydney Sweeney, a registered Republican, has the 'HOTTEST' ad out there... Go get 'em Sydney!" and claimed American Eagle jeans were “flying off the shelves.”
He misspelled her name as “Sidney.” He didn’t correct it. He didn’t need to. He’d made his point.
— (@)
5. Trump's double tap: Slamming Swift & "woke losers"
In the same post, Trump lashed out at Taylor Swift, again:
“I HATE her... She was booed out of the Super Bowl and is NO LONGER HOT.”
(Spoiler: She wasn’t booed, and she’s still doing just fine.)
He then blamed Jaguar and Bud Light for going “woke” and declared that being Republican is now “what you want to be.” Sweeney wasn't just selling jeans anymore; Trump drafted her as the star recruit in his anti-woke army.
Donald Trump praised her and attacked Taylor Swift in the same postX Screengrab/Pop Base
6. JD Vance and right-wing media pile on
US Vice President JD Vance joined the conversation, calling Sweeney an “All-American girl” and mocking liberals for “calling everyone who finds her attractive a Nazi.”
Conservative media roared. This wasn't about an ad anymore; it was a glorious battle against "cancel culture" lunacy. Sweeney, silent as a stone, was now their accidental poster child. The narrative was simple: look at how crazy the left is, cancelling a girl for selling jeans.
— (@)
7. American Eagle held its ground and made a profit
Instead of apologising, American Eagle stood by the ad:
"Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story... Great jeans look good on everyone."
AE's stock price skyrocketed over 20%. They doubled down on inclusivity, and ironically, the controversy gave them a boost. The value? 10 or 20 times the ad spend! Marketing experts said the viral attention (good or bad) paid off tenfold.
No statement. No apology. No clapback. Just silence.
Which is smart, maybe. Or maybe it’s avoidance. Either way, people are filling in the blanks for her. Some see her as a symbol of resistance. Others see her as complicit. The truth? Only she knows. But in today’s world, silence often becomes its own kind of answer.
As one blunt PR expert warned: "She’s a bombshell, but she’s not box office yet... It’ll be carnage."
— (@)
9. Career-wise, this could go either way
Sweeney’s team probably hoped this would blow over. But Trump’s full-throated endorsement has ensured it won’t.
PR experts say this level of politicisation can hurt, especially for someone still building their star power. As a strategist put it: “She’s not Margot Robbie yet. This could backfire.”
She’s now a trending name, yes, but not for her work. That’s a dangerous spot to be in for an actor with ambition.
Sydney Sweeney’s ad started as a joke — now it’s a political firestormGetty Images
10. The real story isn’t about jeans
This isn’t about denim anymore. Or even Sydney Sweeney, really.
It’s about how a single sentence in a fashion ad cracked open every fault line in American pop culture, race, beauty standards, cancel culture, and politics. And how public figures get swept into battles they didn’t sign up for.
One poorly written pun turned into a culture war grenade. And Sweeney? She’s now stuck in the blast radius, like it or not.
— (@)
So... what was this really about?
Let's be brutally honest. That ad was clumsy. The "genes" bit with Sweeney's look? Yeah, it was tone-deaf at best, grossly insensitive at worst. It deserved criticism. But what happened next? That wasn't about the ad. It was about the hunger for a fight.
Sydney Sweeney probably just wanted to sell jeans. What she ended up selling, unintentionally, was a case study in how fame works now. You don’t need to say anything controversial. The internet will do it for you. Then Trump might repost it. Next, you're a symbol. Then you're a controversy.
And just like that, “great jeans” became a political statement, one pair of blue jeans at a time.