Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

CAA launches consultation for Surinder Arora’s £25bn runway plan for Heathrow

Property billionaire's alternative proposal revived as watchdog opens expansion to competition

CAA launches consultation for Surinder Arora’s £25bn runway plan for Heathrow

The CAA said it looked at whether a different model could better serve consumers

Getty Images

Highlights

  • CAA sanctions Arora's cheaper runway proposal.
  • His £25bn plan backed by British Airways and Virgin Atlantic.
  • Alternative could avoid M25 disruption unlike rival scheme.
Surinder Arora could run Heathrow's third runway after the Civil Aviation Authority opened the door to competitive bidding for the airport's expansion.

The regulator started a consultation presenting four possible models for Heathrow expansion, including letting a competitor develop a new runway and terminal at Europe's largest aviation hub.

Arora's proposal has now been approved in principle by the CAA for consideration.


Arora, chairman of Arora Group, presented a £25 billion plan to build a shorter but fully working 2.8 kilometre runway north of the two existing runways.

This differs from Heathrow Airport Limited's £49 billion plan for a 3.5 kilometre runway that would cause long-term disruption to the M25 motorway.

Alternative plan presented

The CAA said it looked at whether a different model could better serve consumers. It held talks with both the airport's owners and Heathrow Reimagined, a group made up of Arora Group supported by British Airways owner IAG and Virgin Atlantic.

Arora said he could have his runway working by 2035 along with a new Terminal 6. The plan, developed with American construction consultancy Bechtel, would cost less, need less land, avoid M25 disruption, and cause less trouble for local residents and businesses.

"Two years ago competition at Heathrow wasn't on the cards and now is very much alive and kicking because the case for change is so strong. We welcome this consultation from the CAA," Arora told The Times.

The CAA outlined four options. These include letting Heathrow itself lead expansion with stronger regulatory controls, longer-term price mechanisms, competitive tendering while Heathrow keeps coordination, or the alternative developer model suggested by Arora.

Under the alternative model, an entity would design, build, finance, own and operate assets such as a new terminal, providing services directly to airlines in direct competition with Heathrow Airport Limited.

Multiple terminal owners within one airport is a model used at various hubs around the world and is popular in North America.

A Heathrow spokesperson said the airport's success comes from private investment and strong airline partnerships.

"We support reform that boosts efficiency, cuts red tape and keeps investment flowing, but not proposals which will undermine our efforts to improve the airport for consumers or delay the economic growth the country needs."

The consultation runs until mid-next month. The government hopes for a planning decision on Heathrow expansion by 2029.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Landsec building

Landsec has put its £1.5bn plans to replace Lewisham Shopping Centre with a major housing and retail development on hold

iStock

South London’s £1.5bn shopping centre revamp hits fresh roadblock

  • The proposed redevelopment included 1,744 homes, student accommodation and a new shopping centre across a 17-acre site.
  • Landsec says higher interest rates, construction costs and a dispute over affordable housing have made the project difficult to deliver.
  • The company says it remains committed to Lewisham and will focus on investing in and operating the existing shopping centre.

A £1.5bn redevelopment of Lewisham Shopping Centre has been put on hold, dealing a fresh blow to one of south London’s major regeneration projects.

Landsec, which owns the shopping centre, said it was “deprioritising” the scheme after concluding that there was no sufficiently certain route to delivery under current economic conditions.

Keep ReadingShow less