Trump says he’s proud trade deal stopped nuclear war between India and Pakistan
In recent weeks, Trump has repeatedly claimed that he told India and Pakistan that the US would stop trade with both countries if they did not stop the conflict.
'It was getting very bad. It was getting very nasty. They are both nuclear powers,' Trump said. (Photo: Getty Images)
Vivek Mishra works as an Assistant Editor with Eastern Eye and has over 13 years of experience in journalism. His areas of interest include politics, international affairs, current events, and sports. With a background in newsroom operations and editorial planning, he has reported and edited stories on major national and global developments.
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump has said that the “deal” he is most proud of is his effort to stop a “potentially a nuclear war” between India and Pakistan through trade instead of through “bullets.”
In recent weeks, Trump has repeatedly claimed that he told India and Pakistan that the US would stop trade with both countries if they did not stop the conflict.
India on Thursday said that trade was not discussed at all in talks between Indian and American leaders during the military clashes with Pakistan, rejecting Washington’s claims that trade stopped the confrontation.
Trump on Friday said, “I think the deal I’m most proud of is the fact that we’re dealing with India, we’re dealing with Pakistan and we were able to stop potentially a nuclear war through trade as opposed through bullets. Normally they do it through bullets. We do it through trade. So I’m very proud of that. Nobody talks about it but we had a very nasty potential war going on between Pakistan and India. And now, if you look, they’re doing fine,” Trump told reporters.
“It was getting very bad. It was getting very nasty. They are both nuclear powers,” he said.
Trump said Pakistani representatives are coming to Washington next week.
“India, as you know, we’re very close to making a deal with India,” Trump told reporters at Joint Base Andrews after departing Air Force One. “I wouldn’t have any interest in making a deal with either if they were going to be at war with each other. I would not and I’ll let them know,” Trump said.
This was the second time in a day that Trump repeated his claim that his administration stopped India and Pakistan from fighting.
“We stopped India and Pakistan from fighting. I believe that could have turned out into a nuclear disaster,” Trump said during remarks in the Oval Office Friday afternoon in a press conference with billionaire Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who left the Trump administration after helming the Department of Government Efficiency.
Trump added that he wants to thank the “leaders of India, the leaders of Pakistan, and I want to thank my people also. We talked trade and we said ‘We can’t trade with people that are shooting at each other and potentially using nuclear weapons’.”
Trump said that leaders in India and Pakistan are “great leaders” and “they understood, and they agreed, and that all stopped.”
“We are stopping others from fighting also because ultimately, we can fight better than anybody. We have the greatest military in the world. We have the greatest leaders in the world,” Trump said.
India has been maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached after direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries.
An all-party delegation of Indian parliamentarians, led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, will arrive in Washington DC around June 3 after completing their visit to Guyana, Panama, Colombia, and Brazil conveying India’s resolve against terrorism and emphasising Pakistan’s links to terrorism.
The multi-party delegations from India to different countries have been underlining that the recent conflict with Pakistan was triggered by the Pahalgam terror attack and not Operation Sindoor as alleged by Islamabad.
The retaliatory Operation Sindoor launched by India targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
About two weeks after the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir in which 26 civilians were killed, India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of cross-border drone and missile strikes.
A NEW report has shown that Indian Americans born in the United States are displaying stronger identification with their Indian heritage than in previous years.
The 2024 Indian American Attitudes Survey by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, conducted online with 1,206 respondents, found that 86 per cent of US-born Indian Americans said that being Indian is “very” or “somewhat” important to them. This marks an increase from 70 per cent in 2020. The share who considered their Indian identity as “not too important” or “not important at all” dropped from 30 to 15 per cent.
The report, titled Indian Americans: A Social Portrait, was published in June 2025 and draws on data collected between September and October 2024.
Shifts in self-identification
The report notes a decline in the use of the term “Indian American” as a primary identity. In 2020, 43 per cent identified as “Indian American,” while in 2024, this dropped to 26 per cent.
Meanwhile, 22 per cent now identify as “Asian Indian,” 20 per cent as “Indian,” and 14 per cent as “Asian American.”
Among US-born Indian Americans, nearly half said they feel equally Indian and American.
Twenty-four per cent said they feel more Indian than American, and another 24 per cent said they feel more American than Indian.
In 2020, 31 per cent had said they felt more American than Indian, and 19 per cent had said they felt more Indian than American.
Cultural connections remain strong
The survey found that 81 per cent of Indian Americans said they had eaten Indian food in the past month.
Sixty-five per cent said they had watched Indian television or movies in the same period.
Thirty-eight per cent said they had participated in or enjoyed Indian dance, music, or art in the past six months.
Only 7 per cent said they had done none of these activities.
Ongoing ties with India
Fifty-five per cent of respondents said they communicate with friends or family in India at least once a month.
Thirty-nine per cent reported having travelled to India in the past year.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
A post office sign hangs above a shop in Belgravia, in London. REUTERS/Hollie Adams
THE government is exploring whether to transfer control of the Post Office to the people who run its branches, according to a new consultation launched this week.
Minister Gareth Thomas said the move would create "a fresh vision" for the service while rebuilding trust following the Horizon scandal that devastated hundreds of sub-postmasters' lives, reported the BBC.
The 12-week public consultation examines two main options for restructuring the currently state-owned organisation. The first involves creating a partnership between government and a mutual body led by postmasters, potentially including other staff and community representatives. The second proposes a charter system similar to the BBC, where government sets guidelines but gives up direct ownership.
"We all know, sadly, the grim legacy... so this is about fixing the fundamental problems," Thomas was quoted as saying, referencing the scandal where faulty Horizon software led to wrongful prosecutions for theft and false accounting.
The consultation follows last week's public inquiry report highlighting the devastating impact on sub-postmasters and their families. Any structural changes would not occur until 2030 at the earliest, allowing time to replace the troubled Horizon system over the next three to five years.
Despite the ownership review, Thomas stressed that the government considers the current network of 11,500 branches "broadly right" and does not anticipate closures. The minister announced an additional £118 million in funding to support ongoing improvements.
The Post Office currently serves 99.7 per cent of the population within three miles of a branch, with 4,000 locations open seven days weekly. Services include banking transactions for major lenders, foreign currency exchange, benefit payments, and passport applications.
Research accompanying the consultation suggests the Post Office provides £5.2 billion in annual social value to households and £1.3bn to small businesses. However, the organisation struggles financially, requiring substantial taxpayer subsidies as postal volumes decline and customers increasingly use online services.
The mutual ownership concept was first discussed in 2012 after the Post Office separated from Royal Mail. Well-known British mutuals include John Lewis Partnership and the Co-operative, where employees have greater involvement in decision-making and business performance.
Rose Marley, chief executive of Co-operatives UK, described the potential change as "genuinely transformative." She argued that employee-owned businesses prove more productive and suggested the Horizon scandal would have been less likely under shared ownership.
"A stakeholder-led Post Office would be far better placed to surface concerns early and protect those on the front line," Marley said. "It would hardwire in a culture of transparency and shared responsibility."
The consultation seeks views on future services, particularly banking support as high street bank branches continue closing. Currently, customers can deposit and withdraw money from most bank accounts through Post Office counters.
Thomas revealed last year that nearly half of branches were unprofitable or made minimal profits from Post Office business, contributing to stagnant postmaster pay. The organisation is already converting its remaining directly-owned shops to franchise models used by most branches.
Meanwhile, the government said it would not pursue "potentially expensive" ownership changes until the Post Office achieves "financial and operational stability."
Keep ReadingShow less
Food and non-alcoholic drink prices were up 4.5 per cent compared to a year earlier, the largest annual rise since February 2024. (Representational image: Getty)
BRITAIN's annual consumer price inflation rose unexpectedly to 3.6 per cent in June, the highest level since January 2024, according to official figures released on Wednesday. The increase slightly lowered expectations of further interest rate cuts by the Bank of England.
Economists in a Reuters poll had expected the inflation rate to remain steady at May's reading of 3.4 per cent. Instead, data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed a continued rise, marking the highest inflation rate in over a year.
Inflation has been rising steadily since reaching a three-year low of 1.7 per cent in September last year. In May, the Bank of England forecast that inflation would peak at 3.7 per cent in September, nearly twice its 2 per cent target.
Among major advanced economies, Britain’s inflation rate remains the highest, standing about one percentage point above that of the United States and the euro zone.
Following the release of the data, sterling edged up slightly against the dollar, five-year gilt yields reached a one-month high, and financial markets adjusted to price in slightly lower chances of a BoE rate cut in August and another later in the year.
Deutsche Bank Chief UK Economist Sanjay Raja said he still expected a rate cut in August but saw more uncertainty around the pace of cuts beyond that.
"There's enough of a slowdown in GDP and the labour market to warrant a 'gradual and careful' easing of monetary policy. But the onus now rests on the labour market to shape how far and how fast the MPC can cut this year and next," he said in a note.
GDP data released last week showed an unexpected fall in output in May. Official figures due on Thursday are expected to show only a moderate easing in wage growth, which remains just over 5 per cent.
Higher prices for fuel, food and transport
The ONS said the biggest contributors to the rise in inflation between May and June were higher costs for motor fuel, air fares, and train tickets. It also reported price increases in food, clothing, red wine, and lager.
Food and non-alcoholic drink prices were up 4.5 per cent compared to a year earlier, the largest annual rise since February 2024.
Finance minister Rachel Reeves said the government was supporting living standards for working-class households through policies such as a higher minimum wage, a cap on bus fares, and free breakfasts for younger school-age children.
A sharp increase in inflation had already occurred in April, when the rate jumped from 2.6 per cent to 3.5 per cent. This was driven by increases in regulated energy and water tariffs, a spike in air fares, and higher costs for labour-intensive services following rises in employment taxes and the minimum wage.
Despite the recent rise in inflation, Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey has said interest rates are still likely to follow a gradual downward path. He pointed to a weaker labour market, which could reduce wage growth, and continued slow economic growth.
In May, the BoE forecast that inflation would return to its 2 per cent target in the first quarter of 2027.
The Bank has reduced interest rates by four quarter-point steps since August. A Reuters poll of economists last month projected two more quarter-point cuts in 2024, including one likely in August.
However, some BoE policymakers have expressed concern that skills shortages in the labour market and other supply-side issues could keep wage growth too high to bring inflation down to target levels soon.
"The risk is that this increase proves more persistent and rates are cut more slowly than we expect, or not as far," said Ruth Gregory, deputy chief UK economist at Capital Economics.
Services price inflation, a measure closely watched by the BoE to gauge domestic price pressures, held steady at 4.7 per cent in June. Economists had expected it to fall to 4.6 per cent.
Matt Swannell, chief economic adviser to EY ITEM Club, said inflationary pressure from energy prices may ease after September, but other factors remain.
"The fall in inflation is likely to be gradual, reflecting ongoing stickiness in the services category," he said.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
FILE PHOTO: Riot police hold back protesters near a burning police vehicle in Southport, England
Could this long, hot summer see violence like last year’s riots erupt again? It surely could. That may depend on some trigger event – though the way in which the tragic murders of Southport were used to mobilise inchoate rage, targeting asylum seekers and Muslims, showed how tenuous such a link can be. There has already been unrest again in Ballymena this summer. Northern Ireland saw more sustained violence, yet fewer prosecutions than anywhere in England last summer.
"We must not wait for more riots to happen" says Kelly Fowler, director of Belong, who co-publish a new report, ‘The State of Us’, this week with British Future. The new research provides a sober and authoritative guide to the condition of cohesion in Britain. A cocktail of economic pessimism, declining trust in institutions and the febrile tinderbox of social media present major challenges. Trust in political institutions has rarely been lower – yet there is public frustration too with an angry politics which amplifies division.
The political arguments this autumn will not take place only at the traditional party conferences. Both the supporters of Tommy Robinson and his opponents in anti-racism groups will try to mobilise marches and street movements in September, just days before US president Donald Trump’s state visit provides a focal point for political protest that could stake a claim to unite, rather than polarise, British public opinion.
Amid a febrile political atmosphere, the State of Us report does find reasons for grounded hope too. There is pride in place just about everywhere. In the long run, Britain’s story is of increasing tolerance and liberalism across generations, despite cities and towns having contrasting experiences of economic change. Talk of a ‘lost decade’ of growth after the 2008 crash had turned into 17 years, Southport MP Patrick Hurley told the recent Belong summit, fuelling a nostalgic sense of decline and loss in many towns. That event spotlighted useful work on cohesion happening around the UK, though Fowler notes that this can be patchy. The 35 areas where unrest briefly flared up did get one-off community recovery grants of £650,000 each to spend in six months. There were no conditions to prevent councils just shoring up general finances, but most tried to do something constructive. Sunderland and Tamworth held community conversations that could found longer-term strategies. Some councils hoped to myth-bust misinformation or contest racist narratives, but they can struggle to know how to engage low-trust sections of the public effectively.
What should be done - and by whom? Because the State of Us report is a foundational input for an Independent Commission on Community and Cohesion, being co-chaired by Sajid Javid and Jon Cruddas, the report sets out the key challenges, but deliberately stops short of recommending an action plan. The government should act faster on the flashpoint risks. The very incitement for which users were imprisoned last August remains online today, illustrating how slow platforms and regulators have been to act on this ongoing national security threat.
Immigration and asylum divide opinion. Governments have spoken loudly about stopping boats crossing the Channel, but failed to do so. Perhaps the new UK-French pilot deal unveiled last week will scale up into an orderly asylum process that could reduce dangerous crossings. The UK government does already have more control over local impacts. The incentives to concentrate asylum seekers wherever housing is cheapest, with minimal communication with local authorities nor contact with local communities, exacerbate local cohesion tensions.
Faith minister Lord Khan rightly notes that addressing the root causes of division and discontent will take time. Making a start requires a clear analysis of both the drivers and the useful responses. This government can sometimes see cohesion as an issue for deprived and diverse areas, rather than as a challenge for everywhere.
Even in withdrawing his contentious “island of strangers” comments, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer again fell into sending parallel messages to different audiences, “deeply regretting” the language in the Observer before reassuring Sun readers that he “stood by” the underlying sentiments. The acknowledged lack of pre-delivery scrutiny over the speech was a symptom of the government not yet finding the bandwidth to work out its philosophical framework, public narrative or policy strategy. This government has had no public position, for example, on whether it is an advocate or critic of multiculturalism, or seeks to offer its own distinct framework for what integration should mean in this changing society.
The anniversary of the riots offers the prime minister another opportunity to voice a more coherent public narrative of what it means to respect our differences and work on what we can share in common. That could underpin a sustained, practical strategy on cohesion. Even in polarising times, one core test of a shared society is how far we can develop a shared story about who we are, how we got here, and where we want to go together.
Sunder Katwala is the director of thinktank British Future and the author of the book How to Be a Patriot: The must-read book on British national identity and immigration.
Keep ReadingShow less
Social media emerged as a significant threat to community cohesion, the British Future report said. (Photo: Getty Images)
COMMUNITIES remain at risk of fresh unrest unless urgent action is taken to address deep-seated social tensions, a new report, published one year after last summer's riots, has cautioned.
Titled 'The State of Us' by British Future thinktank and the Belong Network, the report published on Tuesday (15) said successive governments have failed to take action and warned that a "powder keg" of unresolved grievances could easily ignite again without immediate intervention.
Immigration and asylum remain contentious issues, as per the report.
Three in ten respondents selected "divisions between people who have migrated to the UK, arrived as refugees or sought asylum, and people born in the UK" as the top issue affecting how people from different backgrounds get on locally.
There are widespread worries about the cost-of-living, declining public services, and inequality - leading to frustration about the potential for political change, the survey found.
In a foreword to the report, Sir Sajid and Cruddas wrote: “The bonds that hold society together – civic participation and a shared sense of belonging – are under growing pressure. This is leaving our society more fragmented, fragile and less resilient to internal and external threats. At the same time, forces driving division are intensifying, political polarisation is deepening and trust in institutions is declining.”
“Only through coordinated leadership and collaboration across sectors can we build resilience and connection on a national scale – but it will take boldness, bravery, and a willingness to step outside our comfort zones.”
Led by senior researcher Jake Puddle and co-authored by Jill Rutter and Heather Rolfe, the latest study gathered evidence from 177 UK organisations working on social cohesion through regional roundtables and 113 written submissions. They also conducted a nationally representative survey by Focaldata and held eight focus groups in towns and cities across the UK, including areas that experienced riots.
“Social media emerged as a significant threat to community cohesion. People's engagement with society is increasingly shaped through online platforms, creating an environment where misinformation can direct grievances toward minority groups. Online hate and clickbait headlines perpetuate anxiety through a sense of ‘permanent crisis’,” it noted.
“Trust in politicians has reached very low levels, with the public viewing them as self-interested and disconnected from their concerns. Across the UK, people report feeling less aligned to mainstream political parties and sceptical about their ability to deliver change.”
According to the study, three in ten adults - around 15 million people - said they rarely or never have opportunities to meet people from different backgrounds. A similar number say they don't frequently get a chance to meet other people at all in their local community.
Meanwhile, at neighbourhood level, 69 per cent of people feel their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together. It highlighted many examples of successful community work across the UK, often led by local authorities and civil society organisations.
Kelly Fowler, chief executive of the Belong Network, said: "Good work is happening across the UK on cohesion and community strength, but it is patchy and often confined to areas of high diversity or where tensions have spilled over into unrest. A lack of sustained funding limits its impact. It's time this issue was treated with the urgency it merits, in every part of Britain. We must not wait for more riots to happen."
The report said while strong foundations exist at neighbourhood level, coordinated leadership and collaboration across all sectors will be essential to build resilience and connection on a national scale.