RUKHSANA AHMAD’S NEW PLAY HOMING BIRDS RECONNECTS AUDIENCES TO THEIR ROOTS
A STRONG year for British Asian theatre concludes with the powerful play Homing Birds, which recently had its world premiere at Tara Theatre in London and runs until December 7.
Kali Theatre’s founder Rukhsana Ahmad returns to the company with her moving new play about family, homecoming and reconnecting with your roots. Her story revolves around a young Afghan refugee so desperate to reconnect with his roots and find his long-lost sister that he leaves his adoptive family in London and returns home to Kabul to work as a doctor. Homing Birds continues a writing journey for Rukhsana Ahmad, which has included plays for stage and radio, literary works, translating and pioneering efforts in British Asian theatre during the 1990s.
Eastern Eye caught up with Rukhsana Ahmad to talk about her writing journey, Homing Birds and theatre.
What first connected you to writing?
I attempted my first novel when I was about 10 and fearless. It was a time when there was no TV, no internet, no games consoles and not enough toys, so children had to create their own entertainment. Following in the tracks of my older sisters and a multitude of cousins, I became a precocious reader; we thrived on books and poetry, parlour games and, yes, some outdoor games when the weather was benign. But given that sunset was the curfew hour and I had the body clock of a night owl, reading and writing inevitably became my favourite late night activities.
How do you look back on your journey as a successful writer?
With some humility, I think, but also some pride in what I was able to achieve in the limited time that I had. And I see the creation of Kali Theatre Company as a core achievement. Success always has an element of good luck in it. I was lucky to have found people who had faith in me. Mostly, I should say, they sought me out. For instance, the co-founder of Kali, Rita Wolf and my very first literary agent; then, of course, my long-standing friends, the Asian Women Writers’ group, some of whom became close friends.
What led you towards writing the play Homing Birds?
Homing Birds has evolved from a short play written for Kali’s season of War Plays. To raise the stakes for myself, I wanted to develop the play along themes that obsessed me. As the migration debate has never stopped hounding settlers since Enoch Powell’s provocative speech, I felt it was time to pick up the narrative from the point of view of a settler who has been slowly recovering from trauma.
Tell us about the play?
The play tells the story of young Afghan asylum seeker Saeed, a trainee doctor, unmoored by the sudden death of his adoptive mother. He is driven by a need to find his family and to reconnect with his roots. An encounter with a successful female politician from his home country precipitates this visit and he finds himself ill prepared for what lies in wait for him. Kabul surprises and alarms him in equal measure as he embarks on a quest.
Who are you hoping connects to the story?
The story should resonate with everyone. Almost all of us are dislocated from our natal homes, in a sense, as we search for progress, growth and safer environments. When we look back though, we do find that the past is not a fixed picture. Perhaps, it’s more like a kaleidoscope, yielding different patterns as you probe and prod your history from different perspectives. An honest survey of the past is good for the soul, great for your mental health and wellbeing, and can dispel steam and lurking tensions in your immediate circle and family.
What is your favourite moment in the play?
Although it’s done with a light touch, I love the airport scene. The start of a journey, so familiar to those who have lived elsewhere, yet its loaded with a sense of its momentousness and touched by the poignancy of absences in our lives.
How does this compare to other theatre pieces you have written?
I began it with a less ambitious vision of its possibilities, but think it can hold up well in the body of my work. I feel it’s subtler and more dynamic as I have worked more closely with a director and dramaturge than usual. Also, I have become more skilled at writing plays than I was when I was first commissioned.
What according to you makes for good theatre?
It needs a genuine conflict embedded in believable characters and a credible situation. No matter what you think about the issues, you must be drawn into the conflict by the passion of the protagonists; a conflict that niggles you long after you’ve left the theatre.
What can we expect next from you?
I have some unfinished writing I must attend to. It’s work that requires a personal commitment, and I am hoping to work on a memoir, perhaps in the style of a dramatic monologue.
Do you have a set process of writing?
I’m a freelancer so my commitments vary hugely in the time I need, or, they actually take to finish. It does take time to imbibe the spirit of a story before you can retell it to good effect, so what I need most is dream time, peace and quiet. I like to brood on an idea before I start writing. Apart from my study, I have a couple of favourite spots where I work, but I do like to write a little every day, to stay in touch with what I’m working on.
Who is your own writing hero?
There are several, I’m afraid, and I often forget to name a huge favourite, so do bear with me. Here’s a random list. George Eliot for the scale of her vision,characterisation and deep moral stance. Toni Morrison for her poetic imagination. Arundhati Roy for her truthful commitment to politics. Saadat Hassan Manto for his profound insight into character, understanding of sexuality and society. Amongst playwrights: Shakespeare at his best, in his tragedies, Sophocles for his grandeur and humanity, Arthur Miller for his fine moral judgment, August Wilson for drama through characterisation and, finally, Tennessee Williams for his passion and sensitivity.
What inspires you?
I find that good writing is inspirational. It often sparks off a creative urge in me; but what begins as a piece of work for me is often the strength of a story where the situation is so deeply pertinent to the character of the protagonist that you can see its potential for unleashing disaster.
Why should we watch your play Homing Birds?
You may find it surprises and entertains you and yet you learn something about the people whose story it is and you connect with them – even if that connection is fleeting.
There’s no question who ruled the night at the 2025 BET Awards. Kendrick Lamar walked away with five trophies, including Album of the Year for GNX and Video of the Year for Not Like Us. The ceremony, held at the Peacock Theatre in Los Angeles, paid tribute to Black excellence in music, acting, and sports, and Kendrick made sure his voice and message were front and centre.
Kendrick Lamar accepts Best Album for GNX at the BET Awards in Los AngelesGetty Images
Lamar, Doechii, and a moment that mattered
The GNX rapper also won Best Male Hip-Hop Artist and shared the Video Director of the Year award with Dave Free. Accepting his award, Lamar reflected on his long-standing relationship with BET, saying, “They’ve always kept the culture at the core and put me in the middle of it.”
— (@)
Rising rapper Doechii also made headlines, not just for winning Best Female Hip-Hop Artist but for calling out former US President Donald Trump. In a fiery speech, she criticised the use of military force to break up protests in LA following ICE raids in Latino communities. “Every time we stand up for our rights, the military is sent in. What kind of leadership is that?” she asked the crowd.
A night of icons and throwbacks
The night wasn’t just about current stars. The BET Ultimate Icon Award honoured Mariah Carey, Snoop Dogg, Jamie Foxx, and gospel star Kirk Franklin for their decades of influence in music, entertainment, and community action. Stevie Wonder presented Foxx’s award as he opened up about his recovery from a 2023 stroke. “When I saw the ‘In Memoriam’ segment, I thought that could’ve been me,” he said.
Mariah Carey celebrates her Ultimate Icon Award with a rare live performanceGetty Images
Mariah Carey, presented her award by Busta Rhymes, lit up the stage with a brief but heartfelt speech. “If you're going to win one of these, it might as well be the Ultimate Icon,” she joked, hinting at the ups and downs of her legendary career.
With Lamar and SZA heading back on tour and voices like Doechii’s rising louder, the 2025 BET Awards proved it is a stage for change.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Harris Dickinson debuts as Rhode’s first male model in new Glazing Mist campaign
Rhode, Hailey Bieber’s rapidly growing skincare label, has chosen Babygirl actor Harris Dickinson as the face of its new product, the Glazing Mist. Known for his understated performances and growing fashion presence, Dickinson is the first male model to front a campaign for the brand. The new mist, priced at £24 (₹2,520), goes live on 24 June exclusively at rhodeskin.com.
A surprising choice that feels just right
The campaign, shot in stark black-and-white, features close-up visuals of Dickinson misting his face with the Glazing Mist, designed to refresh skin and deliver a natural glow. With ingredients like ectoin, ceramides, and magnolia extract, the formula offers both hydration and barrier support. It has also earned a stamp of approval from the National Eczema Association.
Hailey Bieber explained her choice simply: she watched Babygirl, loved Dickinson’s performance, and sensed he could bring the kind of quiet edge she wanted. “I didn’t want it to feel too ‘on-the-nose’ with the film,” she said. “It had to be chic and sporty.” The internet, however, couldn’t resist the connection to Dickinson’s now-infamous milk scene in the film, and fans were quick to point out how the dewy mist echoed that very vibe.
Rhode expands, without changing its DNA
Since its 2022 launch, Rhode has stood out for sleek, limited product drops and a focused digital presence. Its recent £790 million (₹82,950 crore) acquisition by e.l.f. Beauty has only amplified interest in where the brand goes next. While introducing a male face might suggest a shift, Bieber was clear: this isn’t about launching a men’s line but widening the brand’s appeal. “I want everyone to see themselves in Rhode,” she said.
Dickinson’s inclusion reflects a subtle repositioning. Best known for roles in Beach Rats, Triangle of Sadness, and now Babygirl, he has also been a regular in fashion, working with Dior and Loewe.
With this campaign, Rhode continues to evolve clearly, without losing the minimalist identity that made it stand out in the first place.
Keep ReadingShow less
HBO’s Harry Potter reboot slammed for casting Italian actress as Indian character Parvati Patil
HBO’s upcoming Harry Potter reboot is already under fire, this time for casting Italian actress Alessia Leoni as Parvati Patil, a character rooted in Indian culture. The announcement has triggered widespread backlash from fans who accuse the makers of side-lining authentic South Asian representation in favour of what many see as surface-level diversity.
Parvati, originally portrayed by Shefali Chowdhury in the films, is one of the few explicitly Indian characters in the Harry Potter universe. The decision to cast someone with no clear Indian heritage has led to heated discussions across platforms like Reddit and X, with fans calling out what they perceive as performative inclusivity.
Fans question why Indian talent was overlooked again
Many online comments have shared similar frustrations: that casting a brown-skinned actor is not the same as casting someone of Indian origin. “They just picked someone who looks brown and called it a day,” one Redditor commented. Another added, “Parvati is not just a name, it’s a direct reference to Hindu culture. It deserved more thought.”
This is not the first controversy to hit the reboot. Earlier announcements like casting Paapa Essiedu as Snape and Arabella Stanton as Hermione also drew criticism from those who felt the series was playing fast and loose with established character identities. Supporters of accurate representation argue that while the intent may be diversity, the execution often feels tokenistic.
— (@)
Adding fuel to the fire is the casting history of the original films, where British-Bangladeshi actors Shefali Chowdhury and Afshan Azad played the Patil twins after being discovered through grassroots-level auditions. That sense of grounded authenticity, fans argue, is missing in the current reboot.
HBO's broader casting choices also under scrutiny
Alongside Leoni, HBO announced several other cast members: Katherine Parkinson as Molly Weasley, Lox Pratt as Draco Malfoy, Johnny Flynn as Lucius Malfoy, Leo Earley as Seamus Finnigan, Sienna Moosah as Lavender Brown, Bel Powley and Daniel Rigby as the Dursleys, and Bertie Carvel as Cornelius Fudge.
— (@)
The series, hoped to be a faithful adaptation of J.K. Rowling’s books, is scheduled to premiere in 2026. But with these early casting calls, many longtime fans feel HBO is missing the mark on cultural nuance—and all this before a single spell has been cast on screen.
The tense deliberations in Harvey Weinstein’s New York sex crimes retrial have descended into open conflict. Jurors are reportedly attacking each other, pressuring hold-outs, and improperly considering the disgraced movie mogul’s notorious past, information explicitly banned from their discussions. This internal strife forced the jury foreperson to urgently alert the judge on Monday morning about a “situation which isn’t very good”, casting serious doubt on their ability to reach a fair verdict.
Infighting and forbidden arguments taint deliberations
According to a court transcript, the foreperson painted a grim picture for Judge Curtis Farber. Jurors are “not on the same page”, with some actively “attacking” others in a bid to change minds. Crucially, they are “pushing people” by bringing up Weinstein’s public history, details not presented as evidence during this specific trial.
As per reports, Jurors are in a heated debate during Weinstein retrial deliberationsGetty Images
This is similar to the earlier “playground stuff” reported last week, where one young juror felt unfairly “shunned” and questioned the fairness of the process, though the judge kept him on the panel. The jury itself signalled deep divisions, requesting a reread of “reasonable doubt” rules and guidance on “avoiding a hung jury”.
Mistrial denied, but jury reminded “Stick to the evidence”
Weinstein’s lawyers, citing a “tainted” and “runaway jury”, immediately seized on the turmoil to demand a mistrial. Defence attorney Arthur Aidala argued jurors were “ganging up” and considering “things that were not brought into this trial”. Prosecutors countered that some past context was legally permissible. Judge Farber denied the mistrial but took swift action. He hauled the entire jury back in, sternly instructing them that deliberations must focus only on evidence presented during the retrial concerning the three specific charges, including rape and criminal sex acts involving three women. He reiterated they must disregard anything else they knew about Weinstein.
Weinstein jury divided by heated disputes over forbidden pastGetty Images
The jury ended Monday claiming they were “making progress”, even asking for coffee to fuel further talks and requesting to revisit some testimony. However, the damage from the infighting and forbidden discussions lingers.
Weinstein, 73, already serving a long sentence for a separate California rape conviction, awaits this jury’s verdict on charges stemming from allegations by a former production assistant, an aspiring actress, and a model. This retrial, ordered after his landmark 2020 New York conviction was overturned, remains a critical, though now deeply troubled, chapter in the #MeToo saga he set to fire.
Keep ReadingShow less
Charli XCX celebrates a year of Brat’s cultural takeover
It’s been a full year since Charli XCX dropped Brat, and the album’s neon-green grip on pop culture has not loosened. Forget fading summer anthems; Brat feels permanently wired into the now. How did an artist long celebrated for being ahead of the curve finally make the whole world tune in? Well, she did it entirely her own way.
Charli was no newcomer. She smashed charts a decade ago with “Fancy” and penned hits for others. Yet mainstream stardom on her own terms felt elusive until Brat. The rollout was masterful, starting with the divisive “Von Dutch”, then the It Girl-packed “360” video featuring faces like Julia Fox and Chloë Sevigny, who soon became unavoidable.
Charli XCX arrives for the 2025 Met GalaGetty Images
Crucially, she nurtured her core fans (“Angels”) with intimate pop-up shows, birthing the iconic Brat Wall, where teasers about collaborations and the deluxe album kept excitement boiling. When Brat landed, hitting No. 3 in the US and No. 2 in the UK, it was a moment of absolute cultural takeover.
Beyond the music: building a movement
Brat’s fire spread far beyond the songs. A simple tweet : “Kamala IS brat”, saw the US Vice President’s campaign adopt the album’s aesthetic overnight, sparking global chatter. Charli directly addressed fan speculation, confirming “Girl, So Confusing” was about Lorde, then brilliantly working it out with her on a remix weeks later. She refused to let the moment die, dropping a full remix album (Brat and It’s the Same but There’s Three More Songs so It’s Not), featuring everyone from Billie Eilish to underground stars, which pushed Brat to UK No. 1.
Charli XCX performing on stage Getty Images
The Sweat and Brat tours became must-see events, packed with surprise guests. Grammy wins followed, plus SNL, Coachella and film cameos. Even her older song “Party 4 U” surged up the charts years later. Charli questioned at Coachella: “Does this mean brat summer is finally over?” The answer seems clear. Brat wasn’t just a seasonal hit. It was almost like Charli XCX meticulously crafting a phenomenon, proving that staying fiercely true to her vision was the ultimate key to connect with a wide audience.