SRI LANKA shipped out to Britain on Monday (21) the last of several hundred containers filled with thousands of tons of illegally imported waste, officials said.
Several Asian countries have in recent years been pushing back against an onslaught of refuse from wealthier nations and have started turning back unwanted shipments.
The waste from Britain arrived in Sri Lanka between 2017 and 2019 and was listed as "used mattresses, carpets and rugs".
But in reality, it also contained biowaste from hospitals including body parts from mortuaries, according to customs officials.
The containers were not chilled and some of them gave off a powerful stench.
The 45 containers loaded onto a ship at a Colombo port on Monday (21) were the final batch of 263 containers holding around 3,000 tonnes of waste.
"There could be fresh attempts to import such hazardous cargo, but we will be vigilant and ensure that this does not happen again," customs chief Vijitha Ravipriya said.
The first 21 containers holding medical waste were returned to Britain in September 2020, according to customs.
A local company had imported the waste from Britain, saying it planned to recover the springs from used mattresses as well as cotton to be reshipped to manufacturers abroad.
But customs failed to find credible evidence of such "resource recovery".
A local environmental activist group filed a petition demanding the waste be returned to its sender and Sri Lanka's Court of Appeal upheld the petition in 2020.
Customs maintained that all the containers had been brought into the country in violation of international law governing the shipment of hazardous waste, including plastics.
A Sri Lankan investigation in 2019 found the importer had reshipped about 180 tonnes of waste brought into the island to India and Dubai in 2017 and 2018.
The Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia have also returned hundreds of containers of refuse back to their countries of origin.
The court heard claims that Stewart-Brown, a Care Quality Commission inspector, had a 'bad temper' and 'took massive advantage' of her father. (Representational image:iStock)
A DAUGHTER left £250 in her father's will is challenging it in court, claiming he did not understand or approve its contents.
Bhavenetta Stewart-Brown is contesting the 2021 will of her father, Laxmikant Patel, who died at 85, leaving the family’s northwest London home, valued at £600,000, to his eldest daughter, Anju Patel.
According to The Times, Stewart-Brown told the High Court that she and her brother, Piyush Patel, received minimal inheritances due to claims that they had “failed in their sense of duty.”
In his will, Laxmikant wrote: “But as a father, I have not forgotten them,” referring to the £250 given to both Stewart-Brown and Piyush.
The earlier 2019 will had split the estate nearly equally, with an extra £50,000 for Anju to balance earlier gifts. Stewart-Brown now wants the court to uphold that version. Her lawyer, Timothy Sherwin, argued that the 2021 will was prepared under “odd” circumstances soon after Laxmikant was diagnosed with lung cancer and allegedly could not properly read English.
The court heard claims that Stewart-Brown, a Care Quality Commission inspector, had a “bad temper” and “took massive advantage” of her father.
Judge Jason Raeburn is overseeing the case. The hearing in the case continues.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Trump made the remarks during a dinner with Republican lawmakers at the White House. (Photo: Getty Images)
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump said on Friday that as many as five jets were shot down during the India-Pakistan hostilities that followed a terror attack in April in India's Kashmir. He added that the situation calmed after a ceasefire in May.
Trump made the remarks during a dinner with Republican lawmakers at the White House. He did not specify which country’s jets were shot down.
"In fact, planes were being shot out of the air. Five, five, four or five, but I think five jets were shot down actually," Trump said while referring to the India-Pakistan conflict. He did not give further details.
Pakistan has claimed it downed five Indian aircraft during the hostilities. In late May, India’s top military officer said the country had changed its tactics after initial losses and had gained an upper hand before the ceasefire was declared three days later.
India also claimed it shot down "a few planes" of Pakistan. Islamabad denied losing any aircraft but said its air bases had been hit.
Trump has repeatedly said he was responsible for the ceasefire between the two countries. On May 10, he announced the ceasefire on social media after the US held talks with both sides. India, however, has not agreed with Trump’s claims that it was a result of US intervention or threats to halt trade talks.
India has maintained that issues between New Delhi and Islamabad must be resolved bilaterally without outside involvement.
India is a key US partner in efforts to counter China's growing influence in Asia. Pakistan is also a US ally.
The conflict followed an April attack in India-administered Kashmir that killed 26 people and led to intense fighting between the two nuclear-armed neighbours, in the latest round of a long-standing rivalry.
India blamed Pakistan for the attack, while Pakistan denied any involvement and called for an impartial investigation.
The US condemned the attack but did not directly blame Pakistan.
On May 7, Indian jets bombed targets across the border, which New Delhi described as "terrorist infrastructure". This led to a series of retaliatory strikes involving fighter jets, drones, missiles, and artillery, resulting in dozens of deaths before the ceasefire was announced.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Police officers stand at fencing at The Bell Hotel, believed to be housing asylum seekers, in Epping, northeast of London on July 18, 2025, following anti-immigration protests. (Photo by BEN STANSALL/AFP via Getty Images)
POLICE promised to track down suspects behind violence at a protest outside a southeast England hotel believed to house asylum seekers, after officers and vehicles were attacked.
The violence followed several demonstrations in recent days in the town of Epping which flared after police charged an asylum seeker with sex offences.
Eight police officers were injured and three vehicles were damaged, Essex police said.
The unrest, which police blamed on people from "outside of our community", comes a year after anti-immigration riots rocked the UK in the wake of the fatal stabbings of three young girls in the northern town of Southport.
Then, rioters targeted hotels housing asylum seekers in several different English cities, infamously attempting to set fire to one in Rotherham, northeast England.
Essex police on Friday (18) insisted officers would "continue to support those communities that want to peacefully protest" but would not tolerate "acts of violence and vandalism".
"After last night I've got a team of specialist detectives today that are combing through the body-worn video CCTV to identify those who are responsible," said assistant chief constable Stuart Hooper.
"And what I can say is if you're one of those individuals you can expect a knock on the door."
Hooper said the "selfish individuals" behind the violence were mostly "from outside of the area" and had travelled to Epping "intent on causing criminality".
Right-wing agitators, including far-right activist Tommy Robinson, have been sharing posts and videos about the situation on social media.
Footage of Thursday's (17) protests showed masked people pelting police vans and jumping on them, as well as clashing with officers.
The disturbances came after police charged 38-year-old asylum seeker Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu with three counts of sexual assault, one count of inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity and one count of harassment without violence.
The charges stem from allegations he tried to kiss a 14-year-old girl as she ate pizza at a restaurant in Epping, just northest of London, on July 7 and again the following day.
He has pleaded not guilty, and appeared in court for a hearing on Thursday.
An asylum seeker from Ethiopia, he arrived in the UK irregularly after crossing the Channel on a small boat at the end of last month.
In the wake of the incident, local officials have called for the Bell Hotel to no longer house asylum seekers.
(AFP)
Keep ReadingShow less
Dr Nik Kotecha OBE DL (L) and Rosella Miccio. (Photo: Davide Preti)
A THREE-YEAR partnership between Emergency UK and the Randal Charitable Foundation is working to save tens of thousands of lives through healthcare projects in Afghanistan, Sierra Leone and Uganda.
The Randal Foundation has committed £500,000 in the first year, with around €1.8 million (£1.56m) pledged over three years. The funding supports medical supplies, equipment and pharmacy costs at Emergency's hospitals and clinics.
Six months into the partnership, the organisations said they are on track to save 28,000 lives and improve over 65,000 lives in the first year alone.
British Asian philanthropist Dr Nik Kotecha OBE DL, who founded the Randal Foundation, has set a goal of saving one million lives. He will also take on a role promoting Emergency UK's work.
"We're delighted to be working closely with Emergency UK once again, delivering together on our mission to directly save and significantly improve more than a million lives in the UK and globally," Dr Kotecha said.
In Afghanistan, the funding supports Emergency's network of facilities including surgical centres in Kabul and Laskhar-Gah, plus maternity, children's and surgical centres in the Panjshir Valley. The charity also runs first aid posts and primary healthcare centres across the country.
Emergency has worked in Afghanistan since 1999 and more than 95 per cent of its staff there are Afghan. The facilities provide care during what officials call one of the world's worst humanitarian crises.
Dr Nik Kotecha OBE DL (L) with Rosella Miccio. (Photo: Davide Preti)
In Sierra Leone, funding goes to the surgical centre in Goderich, near the capital Freetown. The hospital handles surgery and trauma cases for the whole country and has performed over 70,000 operations since opening in 2001.
The Uganda project supports the Children's Surgical Hospital in Entebbe, which provides surgery for children from Uganda and neighbouring countries.
Rossella Miccio, president of Emergency UK, said: "We are incredibly grateful to the Randal Foundation, Dr Kotecha and all the trustees for this strategic partnership which is helping to make a significant impact that lasts for the long-term."
She added that the multi-year funding was crucial for saving lives and building local healthcare capacity.
David Lloyd Webber, managing director of Emergency UK, said the partnership "marks a watershed moment for EMERGENCY UK" and would help reach new audiences across Britain.
The partnership focuses on facilities where care is provided free of charge. In Afghanistan, this includes the Anabah Maternity Centre, which serves a country with some of the world's highest rates of infant and maternal deaths.
THE government continues to encourage India and Pakistan to engage in meaningful dialogue and avoid actions that could further inflame tensions, a British minister has told the House of Lords.
During a short debate in the Grand Committee of the Upper House of the UK Parliament entitled 'India and Pakistan: Peace Representations' on Thursday (17), cross-party peers focused on the prospects of "lasting peace" in the region following the terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22 that claimed 26 lives.
While some peers of Pakistani heritage called for international mediation, British Indian parliamentarians highlighted prime minister Narendra Modi's assertion during Operation Sindoor regarding the strong evidence of state-sponsored terrorism emanating from Pakistan.
"On the matter of Kashmir, the UK's position remains unchanged. We regard the status of Kashmir as a bilateral issue to be resolved between India and Pakistan, taking into account the wishes of the Kashmiri people," said Foreign Office minister Baroness Jennifer Chapman, presenting the British government's stance.
"We do not prescribe solutions, nor do we seek to mediate. However, we continue to encourage both sides to engage in meaningful dialogue and avoid actions that could further inflame tensions. We are acutely aware of the sensitivities surrounding this issue, and our goal is to support a peaceful and lasting resolution that respects the rights and aspirations of all communities," she added.
The minister said the UK would continue to use diplomatic channels to encourage dialogue, promote cooperation, and support efforts to address the underlying causes of conflict. "We believe that a peaceful and prosperous future for the region is possible."
Lord Karan Bilimoria, co-chair of the India All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG), highlighted the recent UK visit of a multi-party delegation of Indian MPs led by BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad to establish New Delhi's commitment to peace in the region.
"India wants peace with its neighbours. It wants to get on with growing its economy, bettering the livelihood of its people, and making a huge, positive contribution to the global community," said Bilimoria.
Baroness Sandip Verma asserted that the "ultimate goal" should be to ensure peace in the region because any conflict also impacts diaspora communities in the UK.
"The largest democracy on the planet is now understanding its responsibility, and we need to make sure, in the way we work with both countries, that Pakistan, too, becomes a thriving democracy," she said.
The debate had been secured by British Pakistani Liberal Democrat peer Lord Qurban Hussain, who condemned the "cowardly act of terror" in Pahalgam.
Hussain said that third-party mediation was the only way to get the leadership of both countries to sit down and agree on a settlement. This view was echoed by Lord Tariq Ahmad.
Minister Chapman reiterated the UK's long-standing stance against mediation, asserting that the UK had made "clear representations to both New Delhi and Islamabad at all levels".