US First Lady Melania Trump has welcomed a new law criminalising the non-consensual sharing of explicit images, including AI-generated deepfake content, calling it a major step towards protecting children and families from online exploitation.
The Take It Down Act, signed into law by President Donald Trump, makes it a federal offence to post "intimate images", whether real or digitally fabricated, without the subject’s consent. Under the legislation, individuals found guilty of intentionally distributing such content could face up to three years in prison. The law also compels technology companies to remove the offending material within 48 hours of notification.
The bill, which passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, 409 votes to 2 in the House of Representatives and unanimously in the Senate in February, has been one of the most widely backed pieces of legislation during Trump’s second term in office. It marks the sixth bill signed into law since his re-election, with the administration often favouring executive orders to implement its agenda.
Melania Trump, who has largely kept a low public profile, played a key role in advancing the legislation. The first lady described the law as a "national victory" and stressed its importance in shielding children from harmful online behaviour.
“This legislation is a powerful step forward in our efforts to ensure that every American, especially young people, can feel better protected from their image or identity being abused,” she said. “It will help parents and families safeguard children from online exploitation.”
Melania Trump first appeared publicly in support of the legislation in March during a solo roundtable event on Capitol Hill, where she urged lawmakers to pass the bill. “It’s heartbreaking to witness young teens, especially girls, grappling with the overwhelming challenges posed by malicious online content, like deepfakes,” she said at the time.
The law addresses two main forms of abuse: revenge porn the non-consensual sharing of intimate real images and deepfake pornography, where AI is used to create fake explicit material by inserting someone’s face into pornographic content. These practices have become increasingly common, particularly targeting women and public figures.
Paris Hilton, businesswoman and DJ, publicly supported the legislation, calling it “a crucial step toward ending non-consensual image sharing online”. Major tech firms, including Meta, TikTok and Google, have also backed the new law.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the first lady was “instrumental” in rallying support for the bill and ensuring its passage through Congress.
Despite the strong support, the legislation has attracted criticism from some digital rights organisations. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) warned that the law’s broad scope could have unintended consequences for free speech and privacy.
“While protecting victims of these heinous privacy invasions is a legitimate goal, good intentions alone are not enough to make good policy,” the group said. “As currently drafted, the Act mandates a notice-and-takedown system that threatens free expression, user privacy, and due process, without addressing the problem it claims to solve.”
The Internet Society, another advocacy group for digital privacy, raised concerns that the law could undermine encryption and pose “unacceptable risks to users’ fundamental privacy rights and cybersecurity”.
Critics argue that the bill, while well-intentioned, lacks adequate safeguards to prevent misuse and could result in overreach, affecting legal online content, including LGBTQ+ material, adult entertainment, and political commentary.
Nonetheless, supporters maintain that the new law fills a critical gap in US legislation by targeting a growing form of online abuse and sending a strong message against digital exploitation.
'Our hope and our expectation is that this is not going to spiral into a broader regional war or, God forbid, a nuclear conflict,' Vance said on Thursday. (Photo: Getty Images)
US VICE PRESIDENT JD Vance said on Thursday that the United States wants India and Pakistan to de-escalate tensions but will not get involved if a conflict breaks out between the two countries.
"We want this thing to de-escalate as quickly as possible. We can't control these countries, though," Vance said during an interview on Fox News' The Story with Martha MacCallum.
"What we can do is try to encourage these folks to de-escalate a little bit, but we're not going to get involved in the middle of war that's fundamentally none of our business and has nothing to do with America's ability to control it," he said.
India is a key partner for the United States in its strategy to counter China's growing influence, while Pakistan continues to be a US ally despite its reduced strategic role after the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021.
Analysts and some former officials have said that with Washington currently focused on diplomatic efforts related to the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, the US may allow India and Pakistan to manage the situation themselves in the early stages without strong intervention.
India and Pakistan have blamed each other for drone attacks, and Pakistan's defence minister said further retaliation was "increasingly certain" on Thursday, the second day of heavy clashes. Nearly four dozen people have been killed over two days of fighting.
The latest round of tensions began on 22 April when terrorists killed 26 people in India-administered Kashmir. India blamed Pakistan for the attack. Pakistan denied the accusation and called for a neutral investigation.
"Our hope and our expectation is that this is not going to spiral into a broader regional war or, God forbid, a nuclear conflict," Vance said on Thursday.
The US has been in contact with both countries, including on Thursday when secretary of state Marco Rubio spoke with Pakistan's prime minister and India’s foreign minister to urge de-escalation and direct dialogue.
US president Donald Trump called the rise in tensions a shame. On Wednesday, he said he hoped the two countries would stop after going "tit-for-tat." The State Department also urged both sides to work towards what it described as a "responsible solution."
Microsoft founder Bill Gates has announced his intention to give away 99% of his wealth by 2045, pledging to accelerate his charitable giving through his foundation.
In a blog post published on Thursday, 8 May 2025, Gates, 69, shared his plan to use the next two decades to distribute most of his vast fortune. He intends to wind down the operations of his foundation by 2045, a decision that marks an acceleration of his previous philanthropic goals.
Gates stated, "People will say a lot of things about me when I die, but I am determined that 'he died rich' will not be one of them." His comments come as he outlines his commitment to giving away the vast majority of his wealth during his lifetime, following the philosophy of Andrew Carnegie, the late steel tycoon who argued that the wealthy had a duty to return their fortunes to society. Gates quoted Carnegie’s famous line: "The man who dies thus rich dies disgraced."
Since its inception, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has already contributed over $100 billion (£75 billion) towards global health and development projects. Gates revealed that the foundation plans to donate another $200 billion over the next two decades, depending on inflation and market conditions. These contributions will focus on areas such as health, poverty alleviation, and education.
Gates explained that his new approach to giving accelerates his previous plan, which involved continuing the foundation’s operations for several decades after his death. He told the BBC’s Newshour that he believes that in 20 years, there will be other wealthy individuals better positioned to address future global challenges. “It’s really about the urgency,” he explained. "We can spend a lot more if we're not trying to be perpetual, and I know that the spending will be in line with my values."
While giving away 99% of his wealth would still leave Gates with a substantial fortune, Bloomberg estimates his current net worth at $108 billion, making him the fifth-richest person in the world. Gates included a hand-drawn timeline in his blog post, showing his wealth gradually declining to close to zero by 2045. He also outlined that the foundation would draw on its endowment to distribute an additional $200 billion.
Co-founder of Microsoft alongside Paul Allen in 1975, Gates played a crucial role in the company’s dominance in the tech industry. Although he stepped down as CEO in 2000 and as chairman in 2014, his influence on the company and the technology sector remains significant. Over the years, Gates has become known for his philanthropic work, inspired by investor Warren Buffett and other wealthy philanthropists.
Despite praise for his charitable work, Gates' foundation has faced criticism from some quarters. Detractors argue that the foundation uses its charitable status to avoid tax and wields disproportionate influence over the global health system. Nonetheless, Gates has maintained that the foundation’s work is aimed at addressing the world’s most pressing issues.
In his blog post, Gates outlined three key goals for the foundation's future efforts: eliminating preventable diseases that affect mothers and children, eradicating infectious diseases such as malaria and measles, and reducing poverty for millions of people. Gates also criticised the recent cuts in foreign aid by the US, UK, and France, calling these reductions a setback for the world’s poorest people. He emphasised that the foundation would continue to support global efforts to alleviate poverty, regardless of political changes.
In a more pointed interview with the BBC, Gates responded to questions about his previous comments regarding tech billionaire Elon Musk. Gates had accused Musk of exacerbating global harm through cuts to US aid, specifically pointing to reductions in funding for programmes aimed at helping children. “These cuts will kill not just children, but millions of children,” Gates stated. “You wouldn't have expected the world's richest person to do it.”
Additionally, Gates raised concerns over cancelled grants to a hospital in Gaza Province, Mozambique, which had been linked to a false claim by former US president Donald Trump about funding for condoms for Hamas. Gates commented that Musk's cost-cutting measures had contributed to children in the region being infected with HIV, an outcome he described as tragic.
The BBC has reached out to Elon Musk for comment, but as of now, there has been no response.
The Gates Foundation continues to be one of the world’s leading philanthropic organisations, with a broad mandate to tackle global health issues and poverty. Despite the criticism, its efforts have contributed to significant improvements in healthcare, education, and poverty alleviation worldwide.
Keep ReadingShow less
Starmer and Donald Trump have announced a new UK-US trade agreement cutting tariffs on key British exports.
PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer and US president Donald Trump on Thursday announced a trade agreement that reduces tariffs on British exports, including cars and steel.
The deal, reached after several weeks of talks, lowers levies on UK car exports from 27.5 per cent to 10 per cent and lifts tariffs on British steel and aluminium. The UK government said the move would save Jaguar Land Rover hundreds of millions of pounds a year, with the reduction applying to a quota of 100,000 cars — close to Britain’s total exports last year.
“This is a really fantastic, historic day,” Starmer said, appearing via video link with Trump during parallel press conferences in London and Washington. “It’s going to not only protect jobs, but create jobs, opening market access,” he said, adding a “tribute” to both negotiating teams.
Speaking at a Jaguar Land Rover factory in the Midlands, Starmer said, “That is a huge and important reduction.”
The agreement also includes reciprocal market access for beef, with UK farmers allowed a tariff-free quota of 13,000 metric tonnes. The UK government said British food standards remain unchanged and confirmed that chlorinated chicken will not be allowed into the country.
There will be no change to the UK’s digital services tax on US tech firms as part of the deal.
“This is just the start,” Starmer said. “We’re more ambitious for what the UK and the US can do together.” He said he learned of Trump’s approval for the deal during a phone call on Wednesday night while watching Arsenal’s Champions League match against Paris Saint-Germain.
Trump called the agreement a “breakthrough” and the first step in broader negotiations. “I’m thrilled to announce that we have reached a breakthrough trade deal with the United Kingdom,” he said. “The deal includes billions of dollars of increased market access for American exports, especially in agriculture.”
Trump denied exaggerating the scope of the agreement, calling it a “maxed-out deal” in response to a question.
The UK will continue to face a 10 per cent baseline tariff on most goods under the reciprocal tariff policy introduced by Trump in April, though there are exemptions for certain products such as pharmaceuticals.
Downing Street said negotiators would continue talks to lift remaining tariffs and seek exemptions from future levies. The UK government added that Britain would receive “preferential treatment” in any future US tariff decisions.
A UK government official described the agreement as a “general terms document” covering key sectors and providing a framework for further negotiations, rather than a full free trade agreement. The official said more talks would follow, especially on tariffs affecting the pharmaceutical sector.
The trade deal was announced days after Britain signed a free-trade agreement with India, its largest such deal since leaving the European Union.
Trump said Starmer had been a “tough negotiator” during his visit to the White House in February. Starmer’s visit included delivering an invitation from King Charles III for a second state visit for Trump.
While the UK has not yet responded with retaliatory tariffs, the European Union on Thursday proposed new duties on US planes and cars if its own negotiations with Washington fail.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
The report provides insights into demographic and socio-economic trends among Asian communities in US
Indian Americans are the highest-earning Asian group in the United States, with a median annual household income exceeding $150,000, according to a report published by The Hindu. Their income is reported to be 40 percent higher than that of both Chinese and Japanese Americans.
The report provides insights into demographic and socio-economic trends among Asian communities in the United States. As of 2013, the Asian population in the US was around 25 million, more than double the figure recorded in 2000. By 2023, Asians accounted for 7.4% of the US population, up from 4.2% in 2000.
Within the Asian population in the US, Chinese Americans formed the largest group at 22%, followed closely by Indian Americans at 21%, and Filipino Americans at 19%. Other communities include Vietnamese Americans (9%), Korean Americans (8%), Japanese Americans (7%), and Pakistani Americans (3%).
The report also noted a decline in the share of immigrants within the Asian population. In 2000, immigrants comprised 63% of Asians in the US, but this proportion had decreased to 54% by 2023. For Indian Americans, the share of immigrants dropped from 72%, reflecting a growing second-generation population.
In terms of educational attainment, the report highlighted notable differences among Asian communities. Taiwanese Americans had the highest proportion of individuals with at least a bachelor’s degree, at 83%, followed by Indian Americans at 77%. In contrast, Bhutanese, Burmese, Laotian, and Cambodian Americans had significantly lower rates of higher education.
These education levels corresponded closely with income levels. Indian American households led with a median annual income of $151,200, followed by Taiwanese Americans. Despite strong educational credentials, some groups had comparatively lower earnings. For example, 69% of Mongolian Americans held a bachelor’s degree or higher—ranking third among all Asian groups, yet their median household income was just $54,300, the lowest among the communities surveyed.
The report underscores the diversity within the Asian American population in the United States, both in terms of origin and socio-economic status. While some groups have achieved high levels of educational and financial success, others continue to face significant disparities.
Indian Americans, in particular, continue to stand out for their high income levels and educational qualifications, maintaining a strong presence in professional and academic sectors across the US.
Keep ReadingShow less
Trump also announced an initiative on historically black colleges and universities and signed orders on AI education and workforce development.
DONALD TRUMP signed a set of executive orders on Wednesday aimed at US universities, focusing on foreign donations, college accreditation, and diversity and inclusion initiatives.
One order directs the federal government to enforce existing laws requiring universities to disclose large foreign gifts. Another addresses accreditation, which Trump has described as a “secret weapon.”
Reading the orders aloud, White House staff secretary Will Scharf said accrediting bodies have promoted “woke ideology” over merit.
Education secretary Linda McMahon said, “We should be looking at those who have real merit to get in, and we have to look harder at those universities that aren’t enforcing that.”
The administration has taken actions since 2017 to reshape higher education, including threats to funding, bans on diversity programmes, and detaining international students.
More than 150 university presidents signed a statement this week criticising what they called “unprecedented government overreach.”
Harvard University, named by Scharf, has sued the government over potential funding cuts, The Guardian reported.
A White House statement said the new orders allow federal action against accreditors for poor performance or civil rights violations.
Trump also announced an initiative on historically black colleges and universities and signed orders on AI education and workforce development.