PAKISTAN'S opposition has tabled a no-trust motion against prime minister Imran Khan as defections in his party and cracks in the ruling coalition appeared to have made his position fragile.
The National Assembly, the lower house of the bicameral parliament, will begin a debate on the motion on Thursday (31) and a vote will be held within seven days.
"The prime minister ceases to hold his office after he has lost the confidence of this House," opposition leader Shehbaz Sharif said, reading from the no-confidence motion telecast live on Monday (28).
Khan, a former cricketer, needs 172 votes in the House of 342 to foil the bid. Since Khan's allies with 23 members are not committed to supporting him and about two dozen lawmakers from within the ruling Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf have revolted, the result is unpredictable.
To placate one of its coalition partners, Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on Monday gave the post of chief minister of Punjab to the Pakistan Muslim League-Q (PML-Q) in return for its support to the prime minister.
The PML-Q has acquired a central role in the ongoing political drama despite having only five members in the National Assembly.
Khan's protege and hand-picked Punjab chief minister Usman Buzdar submitted his resignation to the prime minister.
Buzdar's removal was also sought by rebel lawmakers and a no-confidence motion was also moved against him in the provincial assembly.
He will be replaced by Chaudhry Pervez Elahi.
However, it did not solve the prime minister’s problems.
PML-Q lawmaker Tariq Basheer Cheema said he resigned from the cabinet and will support the opposition in the no-confidence vote against Khan.
Another ally of the ruling coalition, the Balochistan Awami Party (BAP), on Monday announced that it "accepted the opposition's invitation" to vote against Khan, making it stronger with 168 votes.
Khan, 69, is heading a coalition government and he can be removed if some of the partners decide to switch sides.
The PTI has 155 members in the National Assembly.
The country plunged into uncertainty on March 8 after the combined opposition submitted the no-confidence motion along with a requisition to the National Assembly speaker to summon a session within mandatory 14 days. The session was called on March 25, three days after the deadline.
Interior minister Sheikh Rashid said the resolution would be decided by March 31 and said the prime minister “is not going anywhere”.
In a show of strength ahead of the no-confidence motion, Khan last Sunday (27) addressed a mammoth rally in Islamabad where he claimed that foreign powers were involved in a conspiracy to topple his coalition government.
He claimed to have a letter as “evidence” to support his claims.
"Attempts are being made through foreign money to change the government in Pakistan. Our people are being used. Mostly inadvertently, but some people are using money against us. We know from what places attempts are being to pressure us. We have been threatened in writing, but we will not compromise on national interest," Khan said.
"The letter I have is proof and I want to dare anyone who is doubting this letter. I will invite them off the record. We have to decide for how long we will have to live like this. We are getting threats. There are many things about the foreign conspiracy which will be shared very soon," he said at the rally.
Khan came to power in 2018 with promises to create a “new Pakistan”, but failed to address the basic problem of keeping the prices of commodities in control.
The no-confidence motion comes as Pakistan faces a recurring economic crisis, with Khan's government banking on the International Monetary Fund to release the next tranche of a $6 billion (£4.58 bn) rescue package to shore up dwindling foreign currency reserves.
The opposition and analysts said the prime minister has fallen out with the powerful military, which mostly determines who will rule, a charge both Khan and the military denied.
(Agencies)
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You

The wife initially arrived in the UK in 2022 on a student visa, with her husband joining her as her dependent.
Photo for representation: iStock
Hindu-Muslim couple win damages claim over separation before India deportation
Sep 16, 2026
Highlights
- High Court judge Simon Tinkler rules couple may be owed damages over breach of Article 8 right to family life
- Couple's asylum challenge was rejected, but their separation in detention was found to be an "unlawful interference"
- Wife and husband, referred to as FNB and FNN, were detained on 11 September 2025 pending removal to India
A MUSLIM man and his Hindu wife who had sought asylum in the UK on the grounds of feared persecution over their interfaith marriage have won a claim over being separated while in detention ahead of being deported to India.
High Court judge Simon Tinkler ruled on Tuesday (15) that the couple may be owed damages from the UK Home Office over a breach of their right to family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
While their challenge against being denied asylum was rejected, the London court concluded that there had been a "serious failure" when the married couple were held separately.
"The claimants were a husband and wife. During the period when they were at the Immigration Detention Centre they were accommodated separately in the male and female accommodation areas, respectively," reads Justice Tinkler's judgment.
"They said this was an unlawful interference with their Article 8 rights to family life... The claimants are therefore successful in seeking a declaration under Ground 3 that their separation in detention was an unlawful interference with their Article 8 rights."
The hearing before Tinkler was not listed to assess the "quantum of damages" and a claim to assess those damages, "if any", will now be transferred to a lower court.
Background to the case
The couple, who are referred only as FNB for the wife and FNN for the husband under the anonymity granted in asylum cases, claimed asylum in the UK based on "feared persecution in India because of their interfaith marriage".
The wife initially arrived in the UK in 2022 on a student visa, with her husband joining her as her dependent.
Their claim for asylum was refused by the Home Office in August last year after the "human rights grounds and humanitarian protection claims were certified as 'clearly unfounded'."
"That meant that there was no right of appeal. FNB and FNN were detained on September 11, 2025, pending removal to India. They were housed separately with FNB in a female accommodation area and FNN in a male accommodation area.
"The principal reason given was that they were shortly to be removed and, as such, any interference with their Article 8 rights was proportionate," the judgment noted.
Judge's findings
However, the judge concluded that while it may or may not be "entirely legitimate" not to provide family accommodation for families without dependent children for a short period pending removal, it is not legitimate to "mislead" the court into believing that such accommodation exists.
The High Court stated that it is now a matter for the Home Office to ensure that courts are not misled in the future and must also urgently review all current cases in which a similar matter of unlawful separation has been raised.
"The claim will now be transferred to the county court for the assessment of the quantum of damages payable (if any)," the judge concluded.
Keep ReadingShow less








