Illegal migration law strips people’s right to safety, say charities
According to the Refugee Council charity, in the first three years after the Illegal Migration Bill becomes law, up to 257,000 people will have their asylum claims deemed inadmissible
By Eastern EyeMay 31, 2023
Britain's proposed illegal migration law will lead to more people missing vital medical treatment for fear of detention, large bills and deportation, say charities and health workers.
The Illegal Migration Bill, currently making its way through parliament, would prevent tens of thousands of migrants arriving in the country via irregular means from ever claiming asylum. That would also bar them from free secondary healthcare, including operations or maternity care.
“This is going to result in an enormous health crisis and, of course, a mental health crisis,” said Tara Povey, Policy and Research Manager at Refugee Action, a charity that helps refugees and asylum seekers.
A Home Office spokesperson said the bill did not change the free access for all to primary care – accident and emergency and general practitioners – and said safeguards were in place “to ensure vulnerable people have access to medical treatment”.
Under Britain’s National Health Service (NHS), primary care is free for everyone, regardless of their immigration status.
But people without leave to remain in England are usually expected to pay for secondary care, including operations and maternity care.
In Scotland and Wales, they can access free secondary care the same as other residents. People who have been granted asylum and those applying for it can access free secondary care.
There are up to 1.2 million unauthorised immigrants in Britain, according to the U.S.- based think-tank, the Pew Research Centre.
They include those refused asylum by the Home Office and people who have overstayed their visas.
Many of these people avoid seeking medical help, exacerbating existing medical problems and leaving new ones untreated, refugee charities said.
“There are people who haven’t seen a doctor for years ... because of the fear of being reported to the Home Office,” Rita D’Alessio, who runs a free London clinic and helpline for refugees for the charity Doctors of the World (DOTW), told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
That number, the charities fear, will rise if the Illegal Migration Bill becomes law later this year as expected.
Prime minister Rishi Sunak has said stopping asylum seekers arriving on the south coast of England – often in unseaworthy inflatable boats – is one of his top priorities. But small boat arrivals soared to a record of 45,000 in the year ending March 2023, and that figure is expected to jump to up to 56,000 this year, the government says.
According to the Refugee Council charity, in the first three years after the Illegal Migration Bill becomes law, up to 257,000 people will have their asylum claims deemed inadmissible.
With no legal status, no right to work and no access to benefits or secondary healthcare, many would be driven to the margins of society, said Josephine Whitaker-Yilmaz, policy manager for Praxis, a charity that supports refugees. “They will never be able to access any immigration status. It will dramatically increase the number of people that drop out of the system because they feel like there’s no hope for them within it,” she said.
“It’s going to result in a massive increase in the undocumented, rootless, destitute and homeless population, which is already quite big.”
DOTW said demand for its free London clinic and helpline had soared this year, especially from migrants housed in hotels seeking mental health support.
Clinic lead D’Alessio said the new law would leave irregular arrivals unable to claim asylum, without legal status and so more likely to bypass official channels for medical help.
“This new bill is stripping people’s right to safety and there isn’t really a plan to safeguard their wellbeing,” she said.
DOTW said it was bracing for increased demand for its services and needed to more than double the number of its volunteer clinicians to around 150.
DOTW says it is a safety net for people outside the healthcare system, but it can only offer basic treatment and is not a replacement for the NHS.
D’Alessio said while some undocumented migrants could avoid the health system, pregnant migrants needed the NHS and that could put them in a precarious situation.
She said many pregnant migrants would delay ultrasound scans due to deportation fears and then would face fees starting between 5,000 to 7,000 pounds for vaginal deliveries, and more for complicated births, that they could ill afford.
According to a 2022 DOTW report, nearly half of all pregnant migrant women surveyed did not have critical antenatal care until after 16 weeks of pregnancy, compared to a national average of 10 per cent.
UK music industry continue to face systemic barriers that hinder progress, visibility, and career growth – despite decades of contribution and cultural influence, a new report has revealed.
The study, South Asian Soundcheck, published last Tuesday (7), surveyed 349 artists and professionals and found that while many are skilled and ambitious, structural obstacles are still holding them back.
Prepared by Lila, a charity focused on empowering south Asian artists and music professionals, the survey showed that nearly three-quarters of respondents earn some income from music, but only 28 per cent rely on it full time.
More than half struggle to access opportunities or funding, and many said they lack industry networks or knowledge about contracts and rights.
Beyond structural issues, almost half said they face stereotypes about the kind of music they should make; two in five encounter family doubts about music as a career, and one in three has experienced racial discrimination.
Although 69 per cent said there was progress in visibility, but 68 per cent still feel invisible within the industry.
Respondents sought urgent action, including mentorship and networking opportunities, stronger south Asian representation in key industry roles and fairer access to funding.
Veteran musician and composer Viram Jasani, who chaired the Asian Music Circuit and led a national enquiry into south Asian music in 1985, told Eastern Eye the findings were “disheartening”.
“I read the report and my heart sank – it feels as though nothing has changed,” he said.
“Back in 1985, we had already identified the same problems and made clear recommendations for better representation, employment and long-term support. Four decades later, we are still talking about the same issues.”
Jasani, a sitar, tabla and tambura expert, said the report focused mainly on modern genres and overlooked traditional south Asian music, which he believes is central to cultural identity.
“Since colonial times, British attitudes have not changed much,” he said. “If they can erase Indian traditional culture and create a community that lives entirely within an English cultural bubble, then they will have succeeded.”
He added that young south Asian artists were often drawn to Western contemporary music, while neglecting their own heritage.
“We are brilliant in Western genres, but that should come after we are grounded in our traditional shashtriya sangeet (classical music),” he said. “Without that foundation, we lose our sense of identity.”
Jasani also warned a lack of unity within the south Asian community continues to weaken its cultural progress.
He said, “People compete with each other while the world watches. For too long, massaging egos has taken priority over producing the best of our culture.”
According to the survey, one in three has experienced direct racial discrimination. One respondent said, “There are virtually no visible and successful south Asian artists in the mainstream – people simply do not know where to place us.”
Another added: “I want south Asian artists to be part of the collective mainstream industry, not just put on south Asian-specific stages or events.”
While the visibility of south Asian artists has improved, with more names appearing on festival line-ups and in the media, the study revealed this progress remains “surface level”.
Lila’s founder, Vikram Gudi, said the findings show progress has not yet been translated into structural inclusion.
“The data exposes what we call the progress paradox. Seventy-three per cent of the people we surveyed earn some money from music, but only 27 per cent earn enough to rely on it as a sustainable career,” he said.
“The Soundcheck gives us the evidence to enact real change and identifies three essential needs – mentorship, representation, and investment.”
Three-quarters of participants said mentorship from experienced professionals would make the biggest difference to their careers. Many stressed the importance of being guided by people who “understand how the industry works and can connect them to decision-makers”.
Nearly the same proportion called for greater south Asian representation across the music industry – not just on stage, but within executive, programming and production roles at festivals, venues, record labels and streaming services.
Dedicated funding also emerged as a priority, with many describing the current grant systems as inaccessible or ill-suited to the diverse and cross-genre work that defines south Asian creativity today.
Two in five respondents reported that family or community resistance remains a challenge, often due to the perceived instability of a music career. The report argued this scepticism is “economically logical”, when there are so few visible south Asian success stories in the mainstream.
Responding to the report, Indy Vidyalankara, member of the UK Music Diversity Taskforce and BPI Equity & Justice Advisory Group, said: “South Asian music is rich, vibrant, and hugely influential. We need south Asian representation at every level of the ecosystem, plus support and investment to match that influence.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.