WHETHER it is doing his own stunts, tackling taboo topics, taking on challenging roles or working harder than any other A-list star, Akshay Kumar has always pushed himself beyond the limits.
He has done that again with his latest film Pad Man, which will perhaps be the most original commercial Hindi film release of the year. Inspired by a real life story, Pad Man sees him take on the role of Arunachalam Muruganantham, who went to the ends of the earth to provide an affordable sanitary pad for his wife to make her life better, even though the pursuit cost him his marriage.
It’s a role that maybe no other A-list star would have taken on, and one Akshay hopes will make a real difference.
Eastern Eye caught up with the actor to discuss Pad Man, the issues it covers, women empowerment, hard work, being fearless and more...
What was your first reaction when you received the subject of Pad Man?
I was incredibly intrigued by his story, which I think is the first reaction for the majority of people who hear about this film. This was because of the strong subject line, the issues and taboos relating to menstrual hygiene and the shocking data I was exposed to, which just appalled me. I mean, can you believe that this is not just a problem in our country; one in 10 girls in the UK live in period poverty, only 12 per cent of women in India wear sanitary pads, and over 20 per cent girls drop out of school due to their periods?
I think that will come as a surprise to most people...
It saddens me to learn that our wives, daughters, mothers and sisters have lived in shame all these centuries because of such an important biological occurrence. They’ve been made to feel inferior and ostracised from families and societies. It’s even cost some their lives. These issues are close to my heart, because after all my years even I’m only just becoming educated enough about many crisis’ countries suffer with everyday. I myself am ashamed how little I knew.
Really?
I wish I had known since childhood. It would have made me an even more understanding son, brother and husband if I had known or been able to share with the women in my home the menstrual difficulties they face. But because it’s kept so quiet through pressures of society and backward-thinking, it’s never a topic of discussion.
You’ve done different subjects in recent years, but did you think this was too out-of-the-box even for you?
There comes a time in one’s life when substance begins to matter more. I have established myself enough as an actor to now be able to venture into things that can benefit, as well as entertain people. When a man of fame or calibre comes out humbly, loud and respectfully proud to address a social issue of this magnitude, I can only hope people accept the bold move and embrace it with the same encouragement I have.
I think they will…
I can’t force people to see things the way they ‘should’ be seen, but through the power of entertainment I believe people will discover for themselves by watching this film that this is something to be approached, not tossed aside and stamped on with the shameful label of ‘too taboo.’ We need to start a conversation on menstruation and not be afraid to discuss the issues that have impacted women and girls worldwide for centuries. If many men were to cherish their wives’ lives the way I do in the film, they too will do anything to make every day of the month better for them! In Pad Man I show just how much I’m prepared to do to make my wife’s life a better one.
Were you aware of the story Pad Man is based on?
I was aware of Arunachalam Muruganantham’s story before I decided to make this film. I was perhaps somewhat naïve to the struggles women in our country face in terms of menstruation. I have lived with women all my life, yet I have learnt more making this film than I’ve ever known even after being surrounded by women in my own family.
How closely did you interact with the gentleman the movie is based on before shooting?
Quite a bit! Arunachalam is an amazing person and meeting him was an enlightening experience. He took it upon himself to tackle the problems of menstrual hygiene that women across India are faced with. I learnt a lot from him, although it wasn’t always so easy. At first he was quite reluctant to speak to me, and later clarified that it was because he doesn’t like talking to men because they aren’t usually the most understanding! I loved his phrase: ‘Woman strong will make country strong!’ which makes it into the film.
What was the biggest challenge you faced as an actor during this film?
I’m not sure if there were challenges in the traditional sense. The subject matter isn’t challenging, it’s natural. But what I did find a challenge was thinking about how I was going to convince others, particularly men, that it is not taboo. We all need to address menstruation and sanitary pads to improve the lives of women. To be honest, the only way I thought we could really breakdown the taboos and sensitise people to have even a conversation about periods was to begin the conversation ourselves on one of the biggest mediums possible, cinema! And of course, whenever taking on a role, there’s always a challenge to do justice to it.
What is your favourite moment in Pad Man?
It has to be the monologue I deliver during the climax of the film on foreign shores. It typifies everything we are trying to communicate to the world with the film. I just hope the message reverberates loud and clear.
What is R Balki like as a director?
Balki Sir has written and directed Pad Man. He is a story-telling mastermind in his own right. He knows how to make people feel and how to bring a subject to the forefront without making it feel preachy and turn it into a movement. He creates such an incredible bond between an actor and the character, which stays with you for days on end. That’s why I feel his films evoke such a sentiment amongst the audience as they truly feel they are immersed in the story themselves.
What was it like working on a movie where your wife Twinkle Khanna is the producer?
I wasn’t even her first choice for the role! In all seriousness, working with Tina made me even more determined to deliver my best because it was her project. This film has been her passion from the start and she is totally involved in everything. This is a journey we are taking together for the first time. I am proud that it is a film on a topic that will have an impact on many women’s lives and hopefully our society.
Who are you hoping most connects to this film?
We are very keen for everyone in the whole family to see it, but particularly hoping it connects with men as they can help create the change we need. So please bring along your uncles, fathers, husbands, sons, brothers and boy mates. One of my favourite parts of this film has been to open my social media account and see that it is the men talking about pads. That is what I wanted. That’s why Pad Man is a drama; it makes more of an impact than a documentary!
Are you hoping to open up a long-term debate with the movie?
Absolutely! If you change nothing, how will anything change? I hope Pad Man is a conversation starter to help break taboos and tackle stigma. We need to educate and create awareness, reaching the places where it is needed, to help encourage people to speak openly about these topics.
How much do you believe in women’s rights?
I am a strong believer in women’s rights and ensuring all girls and women live an empowered life to reach their full potential. I have said in the past that a society that can’t respect its women can hardly be called a human society. Yet right around the world we see women excluded from everyday life, just because they are on their period. It’s time to end the taboo. It is time to treat menstrual hygiene with a mature attitude and ensure every girl and woman on this planet has menstrual dignity. It is a basic necessity for women to have free access to sanitary pads. It’s their right.
How much of a role do men have to play to get women their rights?
They have a very important role to play as that is where the change also needs to come. It is shocking to see the suffering that women go through when they are on their periods, and men must play their part to end the taboo. One victory for Pad Man so far is that men have started discussing periods, positively and negatively; whatever it is, it’s got us men talking.
You have been on a remarkable run at the box office in recent years; has that put added pressure on you ahead of the release?
Not really. This film is about raising awareness of the issues facing women. Earning money is secondary. The aim is to get the film’s message out to as many people and places where it is needed.
You have always come across as fearless; where does that fighting instinct come from?
There was a time I had nothing; no fame, career or money. All I had was my parent’s blessings. And let’s not forget the run I had at the box office a good few years ago either! I have learnt to persist, live an honest life, and to remember that come what may I have my biggest anchors in life; my wife, children, mother and sister. That instinct to always press ahead comes from their belief and faith in me.
I love your versatility as an actor, but what do you most enjoy about the craft and your own performances?
This has definitely been one of my most exciting periods in my career. I’m really enjoying my work and how it’s been received lately. Mass masala will always be a favourite in our country, but times are changing and so are people’s tastes in films, life, ethics and equality. Everything has to be a conscious decision, timed and planned. just like my comedy sketches. I didn’t suddenly wake up one day and say I want to be more serious about my career. The timing was right in my life and my desire to make a change in the substance of my films; the want to give my audiences more than a laugh and a giggle. It really is an exciting time to experiment with what we can produce as an industry with India’s best interests at heart.
What is the secret of keeping such a high standard for so long?
Good health gives me the stamina to go on. A peaceful mind gives me the conscience to make the right decisions, and my wonderful wife and family give me the backbone to keep me strong.
What is the key advice you would give a young actor?
The same as any job: be disciplined, be punctual, work with passion and respect your producer’s time and money. They are the ones that keep you employed.
How do you keep going on days when you are feeling emotionally and physically tired?
Everyone has good and bad days, the kind where you don’t want to leave your bed. But you literally just have to plough through as I have. So many people depend on me to turn up to set on time. We’re all cogs in a wheel and have an important role to play.
You inspire a lot of people, but today who or what inspires you most?
Yes it’s clichéd, but my wife and children with their insights and tenacity. Then the stories of real superheroes such as Arunachalam just make you wonder and smile that we have such a bigger role to play in life and our life hasn’t really started.
Why should we go watch Pad Man?
Pad Man has it all! A love story, emotions and drama, but above all, it has sincerity. Pad Man deals in ending every single taboo around menstruation globally to ensure everyone can live a life of dignity. We have started that conversation but need our audiences to take this forward.
ROHIT SHARMA’s 81 helped Mumbai Indians beat Gujarat Titans by 20 runs in the eliminator on Friday, knocking Gujarat out of the Indian Premier League.
Mumbai, who chose to bat first, put up 228-5 at Mullanpur in New Chandigarh after a strong opening partnership between Rohit and England’s Jonny Bairstow, who scored 47.
Gujarat reached 208-6 in reply despite an 80 by opener Sai Sudharsan in the must-win playoff.
Mumbai will now play Punjab Kings in Qualifier 2 in Ahmedabad on Sunday. The winner will face Royal Challengers Bengaluru in the final on June 3.
Bairstow joined Mumbai ahead of the playoffs as some players left for international duties. He scored 47 off 22 balls to give Mumbai a quick start.
Rohit, who retired from Test cricket along with Virat Kohli, survived two dropped catches on three and 12 by Gujarat fielders. He went on to hit nine fours and four sixes in his 50-ball knock, earning him the player of the match award.
"I've got only four fifties (this season), I think I would have liked to get more," said Rohit. "Today, after having some luck going my way, I knew I had to make the most of it. I'm glad I could do that, and get the team into a good position."
Gujarat missed wicketkeeper-batter Jos Buttler. His replacement, Sri Lanka’s Kusal Mendis, dropped two catches.
"Not easy when we drop three sitters, especially in the powerplay," said Gujarat skipper Shubman Gill. "Not easy for the bowlers to control."
Bairstow missed his fifty when Sai Kishore took his wicket with Gerald Coetzee catching a rebound from Sudharsan.
Rohit went past 7000 IPL runs and completed his 47th fifty in the tournament with a four. Suryakumar Yadav made 33 in 20 balls, hitting three sixes and one four before falling to Kishore.
Gujarat fought back in the middle overs as Prasidh Krishna dismissed Rohit and Siraj took Tilak Varma on 25.
Hardik Pandya ended Mumbai’s innings strongly with an unbeaten 22 off nine balls, as Coetzee gave away 22 runs in the final over.
In Gujarat’s reply, Gill fell lbw for one in the first over to former New Zealand pacer Trent Boult.
Sudharsan, who leads the IPL with 759 runs, kept Gujarat in the chase with an 84-run partnership with Washington Sundar, who scored 48.
Jasprit Bumrah bowled Sundar with a yorker, and England’s Richard Gleeson bowled Sudharsan to end Gujarat’s hopes.
Bumrah returned figures of 1-27 from four overs. Mumbai’s head coach Mahela Jayawardene said Bumrah is a "massive asset."
Impact substitute Sherfane Rutherford fell on 24 in the 19th over. With 24 needed in the final over, Gleeson bowled three balls before leaving the field with a cramp. Ashwani Kumar bowled the remaining deliveries to secure Mumbai’s win.
The tournament was extended by nine days after being paused due to a military conflict between India and Pakistan. Some overseas players, including Buttler, left before the playoffs.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
The transfer comes amid broader efforts across the United States to confront the legacy of slavery
Harvard University has agreed to transfer a collection of historic daguerreotypes believed to be among the earliest photographs of enslaved people in the United States to the International African American Museum in South Carolina. The move follows a protracted legal dispute with Tamara Lanier, a Connecticut author who claims to be a descendant of two of the individuals pictured.
The images, taken in 1850, depict several enslaved individuals, including a man named Renty and his daughter Delia, who were forced to pose for the photographs by Swiss-born Harvard professor and zoologist Louis Agassiz. Agassiz commissioned the daguerreotypes as part of his now-discredited research to support polygenism — the belief that different races evolved separately and unequally.
The 15 photographs, stored for decades at Harvard’s Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, include individuals identified as Alfred, Delia, Drana, Fassena, Jack, Jem, and Renty. The images were rediscovered in 1976 and have since become central to wider discussions about American universities’ historical ties to slavery.
Ms Lanier, who filed a lawsuit against Harvard in 2019, argued that the photos were taken without consent and accused the university of profiting from them through licensing fees. Although her legal claim to ownership was dismissed in 2022 by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, she was permitted to pursue damages for emotional distress. The court also found that Harvard bore “complicity” in the “horrific actions” linked to the creation of the images.
Harvard has not confirmed whether Ms Lanier is related to the individuals in the daguerreotypes. However, the university said it had “long been eager” to transfer the images to another public institution to place them in a more appropriate context. “Harvard has long been eager to place the Zealy Daguerreotypes with another museum or other public institution to put them in the appropriate context and increase access to them for all Americans,” a university spokesperson said. They acknowledged that Ms Lanier’s claim to ownership had created “a complex situation.”
The settlement now ensures that all of the images, not just those of Renty and Delia, will be transferred to the International African American Museum in Charleston, South Carolina — the region where the individuals depicted were once enslaved. Ms Lanier described the outcome as a “homecoming” and said she was “ecstatic” with the result.
“I have always known, first of all, that I could never care for the daguerreotypes at the level they would require,” she told the BBC. “There are so many ties that bind Renty and Delia and the other enslaved people to that particular part of South Carolina that to repatriate them there would be like a homecoming ceremony.”
Although the museum did not play a role in the legal proceedings, it has supported Ms Lanier’s genealogical research. Tonya Matthews, president of the museum, said the institution would display the images with “truth and empathy.”
“These are not gentle images and the story behind how they came to be is even more difficult to hear,” Ms Matthews said. “So to be in a space that has already created room for conversations about the inhumanity of slavery and enslavement and how far those implications echo even to today is what we do and it’s our mission.”
The transfer comes amid broader efforts across the United States to confront the legacy of slavery within academic institutions. In 2016, Harvard Law School retired a crest linked to an 18th-century slaveholder following student protests and a review of its historical ties.
While Harvard has not disclosed the full terms of the settlement, the decision to relinquish the images is seen as a significant development in the ongoing dialogue about historical accountability, reparative justice, and institutional responsibility.
Keep ReadingShow less
Taylor Swift celebrates full control over the music that launched her career
After years of fighting for control over her early music, Taylor Swift has bought back the master recordings of her first six albums. The deal marks the end of a bitter chapter in her career and gives her full ownership of every song she’s released since her teenage debut.
It all started in 2019 when Swift’s old label, Big Machine, sold her original recordings to music executive Scooter Braun. At the time, Swift called it her “worst-case scenario,” saying she wasn’t even given the chance to buy them herself. Instead, she was offered a deal where she’d “earn” back one old album for every new one she made. She declined. Braun later sold the masters to Shamrock Capital for around £222 million (₹1,848 crore), and Swift decided to take matters into her own hands.
Over the last few years, Swift has been rerecording her old albums and releasing them as Taylor’s Version, including Fearless, Red, Speak Now, and *1989*. These new versions allowed her to regain control and reduce the value of the originals owned by others.
Now, Swift has confirmed that she has officially bought her masters along with the rights to music videos, album artwork, concert films, and even unreleased songs from Shamrock. The price hasn’t been disclosed, but reports suggesting up to £800 million (₹6,656 crore) were exaggerated.
This move brings an end to a nearly two-decade-long struggle. She called it a dream she thought would never come true. In a note to fans, she thanked them for supporting her through it all and helping her get back what she lost.
Taylor’s Eras Tour spotlighted her catalogue as she reclaimed her legacyGetty Images
Of the original six albums, only Reputation and her self-titled debut are yet to be rereleased. Swift admitted she hasn’t finished rerecording Reputation, describing it as deeply tied to a difficult period in her life. Still, she hinted that both albums might see the light again, not out of necessity anymore, but as a celebration.
Swift’s Eras Tour, her biggest to date, presented her entire catalogue and has made over £1.6 billion (₹13,312 crore) globally. Along the way, she’s inspired newer artists to demand better deals, ones that let them own their own music from the start.
Now, at last, so does she.
Keep ReadingShow less
'It was getting very bad. It was getting very nasty. They are both nuclear powers,' Trump said. (Photo: Getty Images)
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump has said that the “deal” he is most proud of is his effort to stop a “potentially a nuclear war” between India and Pakistan through trade instead of through “bullets.”
In recent weeks, Trump has repeatedly claimed that he told India and Pakistan that the US would stop trade with both countries if they did not stop the conflict.
India on Thursday said that trade was not discussed at all in talks between Indian and American leaders during the military clashes with Pakistan, rejecting Washington’s claims that trade stopped the confrontation.
Trump on Friday said, “I think the deal I’m most proud of is the fact that we’re dealing with India, we’re dealing with Pakistan and we were able to stop potentially a nuclear war through trade as opposed through bullets. Normally they do it through bullets. We do it through trade. So I’m very proud of that. Nobody talks about it but we had a very nasty potential war going on between Pakistan and India. And now, if you look, they’re doing fine,” Trump told reporters.
“It was getting very bad. It was getting very nasty. They are both nuclear powers,” he said.
Trump said Pakistani representatives are coming to Washington next week.
“India, as you know, we’re very close to making a deal with India,” Trump told reporters at Joint Base Andrews after departing Air Force One. “I wouldn’t have any interest in making a deal with either if they were going to be at war with each other. I would not and I’ll let them know,” Trump said.
This was the second time in a day that Trump repeated his claim that his administration stopped India and Pakistan from fighting.
“We stopped India and Pakistan from fighting. I believe that could have turned out into a nuclear disaster,” Trump said during remarks in the Oval Office Friday afternoon in a press conference with billionaire Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who left the Trump administration after helming the Department of Government Efficiency.
Trump added that he wants to thank the “leaders of India, the leaders of Pakistan, and I want to thank my people also. We talked trade and we said ‘We can’t trade with people that are shooting at each other and potentially using nuclear weapons’.”
Trump said that leaders in India and Pakistan are “great leaders” and “they understood, and they agreed, and that all stopped.”
“We are stopping others from fighting also because ultimately, we can fight better than anybody. We have the greatest military in the world. We have the greatest leaders in the world,” Trump said.
India has been maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached after direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries.
An all-party delegation of Indian parliamentarians, led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, will arrive in Washington DC around June 3 after completing their visit to Guyana, Panama, Colombia, and Brazil conveying India’s resolve against terrorism and emphasising Pakistan’s links to terrorism.
The multi-party delegations from India to different countries have been underlining that the recent conflict with Pakistan was triggered by the Pahalgam terror attack and not Operation Sindoor as alleged by Islamabad.
The retaliatory Operation Sindoor launched by India targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
About two weeks after the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir in which 26 civilians were killed, India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of cross-border drone and missile strikes.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
The procedure can be conducted via a nasal or mouth swab, saliva sample, or blood test
World Boxing has announced the introduction of a mandatory sex test for all athletes competing in its events, with immediate effect. The move affects Paris 2024 women’s welterweight silver medallist Imane Khelif, who has been barred from participation until she completes the required procedure.
The governing body, recently granted provisional recognition by the International Olympic Committee to oversee boxing at the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, said the testing aims to ensure fair competition across male and female categories.
“Imane Khelif may not participate in the female category at the Eindhoven Box Cup, 5–10 June 2025, and any World Boxing event until Imane Khelif undergoes genetic sex screening in accordance with World Boxing's rules and testing procedures,” it said in a statement released on Friday.
Under the new policy, all boxers aged 18 and above must undergo a PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test to determine biological sex. The test detects the SRY gene, which reveals the presence of a Y chromosome, considered a key indicator of male biological sex.
The procedure can be conducted via a nasal or mouth swab, saliva sample, or blood test.
World Boxing stated the policy was introduced to create “a competitive level playing field” and forms part of its broader efforts to solidify its role as the sport’s international regulator after a period of governance disputes.
Khelif’s eligibility will remain suspended until the test is completed.
Justin Bieber faces backlash for ‘I love you’ comment on 17-year-old star Ariana Greenblatt’s post