Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Ending Covid restrictions too soon ‘could risk lives’

By Amit Roy

THE BBC reports that the proportion of Pakistanis aged 80 and over refusing to take the vaccine in Bradford is 23 per cent.


They are a danger not only to themselves, but to other members of their own families, as well as the NHS and the rest of society.

That figure compares with 14.9 per cent for Bangladeshis; 9.2 per cent for black Britons; six per cent for Indians; and three per cent for white British.

One doctor and epidemiologist who has been keeping a diary for the BBC is Prof John Wright. He is head of the Bradford Institute for Health Research and a veteran of cholera, HIV and Ebola epidem­ics in sub-Saharan Africa.

He has recorded the experiences of Tom Ratcliffe, a GP in Keighley, north-west of Bradford, who has pointed out that “there’s a risk that Covid will remain en­demic in pockets of the popula­tion where there is a low uptake of vaccination. Nearly a fifth of the population of the area covered by the Bradford District and Craven Clinical Commissioning Group (which provided the data about vaccine refusal) falls into the Pa­kistani/British Pakistani category, and it’s a group that has been more vulnerable to the virus than some others.”

“This is a population at high risk and yet also at high risk of not being vaccinated,” according to Ratcliffe. “In multi-generation households we find that everyone needs to reach consensus. In our Pakistani communities, we have to try and persuade key people in those family networks. We need to gain the trust in families and we hope that the clinics in the mosque will help with that.”

The BBC diary quoted Abdul Majid, a science graduate, whose father, Abdul Saboor, has been in intensive care since October. “He says a great variety of conspiracy theories are swirling around, gen­erating much discussion in Brad­ford’s Pakistani community. Some are saying they will have the vac­cination, others that they won’t.

“At this present time I’m scared to take the vaccine,” Majid says. “So, you know, I’m just waiting to see what reaction people get.”

Indeed, what can be done to encourage more British Asians to take the vaccine other than asking nicely? The take-up seems lowest among Pakistanis, but a Hindu Punjabi friend tells me: “My mother, who is 82, is resisting taking the vaccine, not because of any conspiracy theories, but just a bad experience with the flu jab a few years ago – and stubbornness!”

Meanwhile, home secretary Priti Patel visited the BAPS Swa­minarayan Mandir in Neasden, north London, which has set up a vaccination centre at its associat­ed school opposite the temple.

“I’ve met everybody – from healthcare professionals to repre­sentatives of the NHS and the ar­my as well as members of the public – who have come to the centre to be vaccinated,” she said.

“And I just wanted to say thank you to all, and, in particular, the volunteers, who have made this national effort possible. It is a he­roic effort that is saving lives. It will save your life when you have the vaccine and it will save the lives of other people, too.”

It seems totally crazy that peo­ple at greatest risk of dying from Covid are the ones with the great­est resolve not to have the life-saving vaccines. It doesn’t make any sense.

Which brings me to the ques­tion: “When should the lockdown be eased?”

It’s true many Asian businesses, especially in the hospitality, catering and travel sectors, have been devastated by the pandemic. Some right-wing groups are misusing statistics to put pressure on the prime minister. “Look, the infec­tion rate is plummeting,” they say.

From 60,000 to 20,000 cases a day is indeed a steep fall, but 20,000 is still a huge figure. The downward trend is a relief, but loosening the lockdown too soon risks many more deaths – espe­cially among those who have re­fused to take the vaccine – and a fourth lockdown. To state the ob­vious, a business can be rebuilt but a life, once lost, is lost for ever.

An English friend, whose wife is Indian, told me: “My wife and daughters are good, although Covid has taken a dreadful toll among my wife’s aunts and un­cles. She has lost five of them.”

More For You

tech grok

Musk – the world’s richest man – wants to be the greatest global influencer too: a Citizen Kane for our age. (Photo credit: Getty Images)

Why Britain must make social media lawful again

THIS must be a “tipping point” for the rule of law online, technology secretary Liz Kendall told the House of Commons earlier this week. X owner Elon Musk’s Grok AI tool helped that site’s users make sexist harassment the viral new year trend of 2026. Politicians across the world declared it was “appalling” and “unacceptable”. The challenge is to turn that declaratory rhetoric into action. Britain’s media regulator Ofcom will open a formal investigation.

The controversy has illuminated again how US billionaire businessman Musk takes a “pick and mix” approach as to which laws he thinks should apply to him and his companies. Even libertarian site owners tend to recognise some responsibility to remove child sexual abuse. But Musk was laughing about the nudification trend. He is contemptuous about laws curbing hate crime and the incitement of violence, saying they are signs Britain has a “fascist” government which must be overthrown. What is vital is that our government and regulators do not risk emulating Musk’s “pick and mix” approach to when unlawful content really matters. Ofcom states it will not “hesitate to investigate” when it suspects companies are failing in their duties “especially where there’s a risk of harm to children”. This will be a popular public priority. Ofcom must this year show parliamentarians and the public that it can find the bandwidth and capacity to insist on sites meeting all of their legal duties.

Keep ReadingShow less