Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Cast in a new light

by Amit Roy

ROYAL COURT HOLDS FRESH READING OF PARTAP SHARMA’S ‘BANNED’ PLAY


THE Royal Court in London’s Sloane Square last week had a reading of the late Partap Sharma’s play A Touch of Brightness, which it first staged over 50 years ago in 1967, after it had been banned by the authorities in India.

The reason given for the ban was the authorities felt that the play, set in a Bombay (now Mumbai) brothel, would damage India’s international standing. It had been picked for a Commonwealth festival in the UK in 1965, but the cast had their pass­ports impounded just as they were due to fly out of the country.

So great was the shock of having his play banned that Partap devel­oped a paralysis on one side of his face, I was told by his English wife, Sue Sharma, who had come over from her home in Mumbai with her two daughters and grandchildren for the “historic” occasion.

Last week’s play reading was or­ganised by Sudha Bhuchar’s new theatre enterprise, Bhuchar Boule­vard, in an exercise called Retracing Our Footsteps. It was directed by Kristine Landon-Smith, who had been the artistic co-director when she and Sudha ran the Tamasha Theatre Company.

The Royal Court had readings of three plays curated by Suman Bhuchar. The others were Borderline by Hanif Kureishi, based on the South­all riots of 1979, and Blood by Har­want Bains, on the consequences of the partition of India.

My mind went back to an even­ing a long time ago. A friend had been invited to dinner by Partap and Sue and took me along with him. Partap was already experienc­ing problems with his breathing.

In 2006, Waterman’s in London put on another excellent play by Partap about Mahatma Gandhi’s time in South Africa called Sammy! A Word that Broke an Empire. I had already seen it in Mumbai the pre­vious year.

Partap, who was certainly one of India’s most eminent playwrights, died in 2011, aged 71.

There is a lot of history attached to A Touch of Brightness, which was first performed at the Royal Court on March 5, 1967. The cast included Saeed Jaffrey, Zohra Segal and Roshan Seth.

As a further act of solidarity with India’s artistic fraternity, a radio ad­aptation of the play was transmitted on the BBC Third Programme on November 3, 1967, with a mainly English cast that included Judi Dench, then 32, as “Rukhmini”, the beggar girl who is the lead character in the brothel. The music was com­posed by Ravi Shankar.

Partap, represented by Soli Sora­bjee and Iqbal Chagla, took legal action in February 1966 and the ban was lifted in India in 1972.

A Touch of Brightness is now in­cluded in many academic courses in India and in other countries. The Nigerian author, Wole Soyinka, said after winning the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1986 that he had be­gun to be interested in Indian phi­losophy after encountering A Touch of Brightness.

When Partap wrote to thank him, Soyinka replied he had tried with­out success to put on the play and asked if the playwright had a spare copy – “at least I shall turn over its pages from time to time, and hope...”

As for artistic freedom, Sue does not believe that things have im­proved much, despite the passage of half a century.

“We live with thugs and gangs and that awful rightwing morality,” she said.

More For You

​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

We are living faster than ever before

AMG

​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

Shiveena Haque

Finding romance today feels like trying to align stars in a night sky that refuses to stay still

When was the last time you stumbled into a conversation that made your heart skip? Or exchanged a sweet beginning to a love story - organically, without the buffer of screens, swipes, or curated profiles? In 2025, those moments feel rarer, swallowed up by the quickening pace of life.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

Shabana Mahmood, US homeland security secretary Kristi Noem, Canada’s public safety minister Gary Anandasangaree, Australia’s home affairs minister Tony Burke and New Zealand’s attorney general Judith Collins at the Five Eyes security alliance summit on Monday (8)

Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer’s government is not working. That is the public verdict, one year in. So, he used his deputy Angela Rayner’s resignation to hit the reset button.

It signals a shift in his own theory of change. Starmer wanted his mission-led government to avoid frequent shuffles of his pack, so that ministers knew their briefs. Such a dramatic reshuffle shows that the prime minister has had enough of subject expertise for now, gambling instead that fresh eyes may bring bold new energy to intractable challenges on welfare and asylum.

Keep ReadingShow less
indian-soldiers-ww1-getty
Indian infantrymen on the march in France in October 1914 during World War I. (Photo: Getty Images)
Getty Images

Comment: We must not let anti-immigration anger erase south Asian soldiers who helped save Britain

This country should never forget what we all owe to those who won the second world war against fascism. So the 80th anniversary of VE Day and VJ Day this year have had a special poignancy in bringing to life how the historic events that most of us know from grainy black and white photographs or newsreel footage are still living memories for a dwindling few.

People do sometimes wonder if the meaning of these great historic events will fade in an increasingly diverse Britain. If we knew our history better, we would understand why that should not be the case.

For the armies that fought and won both world wars look more like the Britain of 2025 in their ethnic and faith mix than the Britain of 1945 or 1918. The South Asian soldiers were the largest volunteer army in history, yet ensuring that their enormous contribution is fully recognised in our national story remains an important work in progress.

Keep ReadingShow less
Spotting the signs of dementia

Priya Mulji with her father

Spotting the signs of dementia

How noticing the changes in my father taught me the importance of early action, patience, and love

I don’t understand people who don’t talk or see their parents often. Unless they have done something to ruin your lives or you had a traumatic childhood, there is no reason you shouldn’t be checking in with them at least every few days if you don’t live with them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Populist right thrives amid polarised migration debate

DIVISIVE AGENDA:Police clash withprotesters outside Epping councilafter a march from the Bell Hotelhousing asylum seekers last Sunday(31)

Getty Images

Comment: Populist right thrives amid polarised migration debate

August is dubbed 'the silly season’ as the media must fill the airwaves with little going on. But there was a more sinister undertone to how that vacation news vacuum got filled this year. The recurring story of the political summer was the populist right’s confidence in setting the agenda and the anxiety of opponents about how to respond.

Tensions were simmering over asylum. Yet frequent predictions of mass unrest failed to materialise. The patchwork of local protests and counter-protests had a strikingly different geography to last summer. The sporadic efforts of disorder came in the affluent southern suburbs of Epping and Hillingdon, Canary Wharf and Cheshunt with no disorder and few large protests in the thirty towns that saw riots last August. Prosecutions, removing local ringleaders, deter. Local cohesion has been a higher priority where violence broke out than everywhere else. Hotel use for asylum has halved - and is more common in the south. The Home Office went to court to keep asylum seekers in Epping’s Bell Hotel, for now, yet stresses its goal to stop using hotels by 2029. The Refugee Council’s pragmatic suggestion of giving time-limited leave to remain to asylum seekers from the five most dangerous countries could halve the need for hotels within months.

Keep ReadingShow less