Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

Why Robert Jenrick’s plot for future is far from right

In setting out his vision of an idyllic England in a Daily Mail article, he has harked back to a time when it was essentially a white country

Why Robert Jenrick’s plot for future is far from right
Robert Jenrick

ROBERT JENRICK is trying to clinch the Tory party leadership, but it is such a shame that in seeking to do so, a previously liberal politician has donned the mantle of Enoch Powell.

It seemed curious he resigned as immigration minister from the cabinet of Rishi Sunak, a friend he had previously supported, but it is now clear he was plotting for the future. He was positioning himself for the leadership battle that would follow Rishi’s expected defeat in the general election.


In setting out his vision of an idyllic England in a Daily Mail article, he has harked back to a time when it was essentially a white country. Of course, by focusing on England for the English, he is turning the Scots, Welsh and the Irish into second class citizens.

Embracing the politics of the far right may help him win votes from Tory party members, but won’t help him win the next general election.

“A nation should put its own citizens first,” he says.

Own citizens?

Although not explicitly spelt out, I think he means white people. That cuts out the UK-born children and grandchildren of first-generation immigrants. They consider themselves to be British, though not necessarily English in the sense Jenrick uses the word.

“But let’s be clear: the combination of unprecedented migration, the dismantling of our national culture, non-integrating multiculturalism and the denigration of our identity has presented huge problems,” he says.

By “national culture”, I think he means a return to the old days when the British empire was not questioned in the way, say, William Dalrymple, Sathnam Sanghera or Corinne Fowler have done in their books. The young do see Britain and many British institutions benefited from the slave trade before it was abolished.

The problem of immigration is complex. In a country with an ageing population, especially one in which many people no longer seek employment, young immigrants are needed to secure pensions. And, yet, as Jenrick points out, absorbing foreign cultures is not easy.

Britain needs immigrants, as do many west European countries, because the working population is dwindling.

Jenrick says: “A nation cannot exist without a border, but the UK has experienced record illegal migration – and England has been saddled with the brunt of the burden. And, most importantly, the ties that bind a nation together fray if we have huge numbers of people arriving over a short period of time.

It is England, and England’s cities in particular, that have been most affected by the unprecedented mass migration of the past 25 years. This influx has put our roads, GP surgeries and schools under pressure, while not making England, or any part of the UK, richer.”

That is rabble rousing and not the speech of a future prime minister. The difficulty is neither Jenrick nor any of the current Tory leadership candidates are quite in Rishi’s class. Perhaps Rishi’s day is done, but “Enoch Jenrick” is not the answer.

More For You

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn

Getty Images

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

It is a truth universally acknowledged that voters are dissatisfied with the political choices on offer - so must they be in want of new parties too? A proliferation of start-ups showed how tricky political match-making can be. Zarah Sultana took Jeremy Corbyn by surprise by announcing they will co-lead a new left party. Two of Nigel Farage’s exes announced separate political initiatives to challenge Reform from its right, with the leader of London’s Conservatives lending her voice to Rupert Lowe’s revival of the politics of repatriation.

Corbyn and Sultana are from different generations. He had been an MP for a decade by the time she was born. For Sultana’s allies, this intergenerational element is a core case for the joint leadership. But the communications clash suggests friction ahead. After his allies could not persuade Sultana to retract her announcement, Corbyn welcomed her decision to leave Labour, saying ‘negotiations continue’ over the structure and leadership of a new party. It will seek to link MPs elected as pro-Gaza independents with other strands of the left outside Labour.

Keep ReadingShow less
Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

Amol Rajan at Prayagraj

Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

ONE reason I watched the BBC documentary Amol Rajan Goes to the Ganges with particular interest was because I have been wondering what to do with the ashes of my uncle, who died in August last year. His funeral, like that of his wife, was half Christian and half Hindu, as he had wished. But he left no instructions about his ashes.

Sooner or later, this is a question that every Hindu family in the UK will have to face, since it has been more than half a century since the first generation of Indian immigrants began arriving in this country. Amol admits he found it difficult to cope with the loss of his father, who died aged 76 three years ago. His ashes were scattered in the Thames.

Keep ReadingShow less
One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less