'UNSC may meet soon to discuss India-Pakistan situation'
“We are in close contact ... but this is something which might happen, I would say, sooner rather than later. We will see, we are preparing. It's the first day of our (UNSC) presidency,” he said.
Council president Evangelos Sekeris said the meeting would provide an opportunity for members to express their views and help ease tensions between the two countries. (Photo: LinkedIn/Evangelos Sekeris)
Vivek Mishra works as an Assistant Editor with Eastern Eye and has over 13 years of experience in journalism. His areas of interest include politics, international affairs, current events, and sports. With a background in newsroom operations and editorial planning, he has reported and edited stories on major national and global developments.
THE UN Security Council (UNSC) could meet “sooner rather than later” to discuss the situation between India and Pakistan, council president and Greece’s permanent representative to the UN ambassador Evangelos Sekeris said on Thursday.
He said the meeting would provide an opportunity for members to express their views and help ease tensions between the two countries.
“Of course, if a request comes for a meeting, then...I think this meeting should take place because, as we said, maybe it's also an opportunity to have views expressed and this might help to diffuse a bit tensions. We will see,” Sekeris said in response to a question by PTI.
“We are in close contact ... but this is something which might happen, I would say, sooner rather than later. We will see, we are preparing. It's the first day of our (UNSC) presidency,” he said.
Sekeris was briefing UN reporters on the council's work programme under Greece's month-long presidency of the 15-nation body.
He was asked about rising tensions between India and Pakistan and whether there had been any request for a meeting or consultations on the issue.
In response to a question by PTI on India being a victim of cross-border terrorism from Pakistan, Sekeris said, “It's an issue which is very pertinent. As I said before, as a position of principle, we strongly condemn any act of terrorism and this is what we did” on the “heinous terrorist attack” in Pahalgam in which innocent civilians died.
He added, “We express our condolences to the government of India, Nepal and the families of victims.”
“This is a position of principle. We condemn terrorism in all its forms, everywhere it is happening. On the other hand, we are concerned about this tension which is mounting in the region. Two very big countries. Of course, India is far more bigger” than Pakistan, Sekeris said.
He said both India and Pakistan are far larger than Greece and added, “So the size and volume are of a different nature. We also join calls for de-escalation and dialogue so that the situation does not spiral out of control.”
Earlier this week, external affairs minister S Jaishankar said he had a “good conversation” with Greek foreign minister George Gerapetritis and had “discussed the Pahalgam terrorist attack.” He said India welcomed Greece's firm opposition to cross-border terrorism and added, “Our strategic partnership reflects the depth of our ties.”
Sekeris said Greece has “an excellent bilateral cooperation with India” and mentioned recent visits by leaders from both countries. He also said Greece has relations with Pakistan and added, “We don't see it antagonistically. With Pakistan, we are together in the council and we will cooperate.”
On a possible security council meeting, he said, “It is an issue which is now ongoing, evolving.” He said the council had issued a press statement condemning the “heinous terrorist attack” in Jammu and Kashmir and called for the perpetrators to be brought to justice.
“We are listening, of course, we are monitoring closely the situation and will be seized on the matter, of course. This is certain that it will happen,” Sekeris said. He reiterated, “We express our deepest condolences to the government of India and Nepal and the families of the victims. At the same time, I have to tell you that we are also seriously concerned with the growing bilateral tension in the atmosphere, which has been evolving between India and Pakistan.”
“We are also joining others who are calling for de-escalation and dialogue so that the situation does not spiral out of control,” he added.
He said larger member states are in contact with both sides. “I'm not in a position to reply directly to your question, but with plain logic, this is something which might probably happen. I mean, if the situation is not de-escalating, calling for an extraordinary meeting of the security council is something which can come as a consequence, because it's actually the main business of the security council,” he said.
Pakistan currently sits in the council as a non-permanent member, elected along with Greece. “So they are there,” Sekeris said. He added, “If during the Greek presidency, such a request comes, we will process it. But we hope really that this situation will de-escalate because it's two very big member states and a lot is at stake and let's hope that those efforts for de-escalation will be helpful. But we are prepared.”
To a question on Pakistan not naming The Resistance Front in the press statement on the Pahalgam attack, Sekeris said, “When you have a press statement, whichever text which is adopted by consensus, unanimity, you cannot comment on the various stages of the negotiation because it's an internal document.”
“For me, the important thing” is that the press statement was issued, “because having in the security council, one member state which is part of this conflict, of course, then you could expect another outcome. But I think that the statement was there. This is very important. On the other hand, yes, we are also concerned on a national basis. (Greek) the foreign minister spoke with the foreign minister of India. We are also in constant contact with Pakistan.”
“There are calls for de-escalation. Of course, on the other hand, it's a difficult subject, but we are very receptive to any request and if meeting of security council will take place in any form, we will steer the debate as president in a way to be faithful to our mandate, but we really hope that maybe de-escalation would be possible,” Sekeris said.
Meanwhile, UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres has spoken to external affairs minister Jaishankar and Pakistan prime minister Shehbaz Sharif and offered his good offices, his spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said.
In response to a question on whether the secretary-general would travel to the region to mediate, Dujarric said, “I don't think there would be any travel until there's a clear message that, as in any instance where we have high tensions between two countries, that they've both accepted his good offices.”
UK's economy grew more than expected in the second quarter, though at a slower pace than the first three months of 2025, as US tariffs and a higher UK business tax weighed on activity, official data showed on Thursday.
Gross domestic product rose 0.3 per cent in April-June, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said, above analyst forecasts of 0.1 per cent growth. This followed a 0.7 per cent rise in the first quarter.
“Today’s economic figures are positive with a strong start to the year and continued growth in the second quarter,” said finance minister Rachel Reeves.
“But there is more to do to deliver an economy that works for working people,” she added, after a challenging first year in power for the Labour government.
The ONS said growth in construction and services in the second quarter helped offset a fall in production.
“Growth was led by services, with computer programming, health and vehicle leasing growing,” said Liz McKeown, ONS director of economic statistics.
Data released on Wednesday showed UK unemployment at a four-year high of 4.7 per cent in the second quarter.
The slowdown comes after the government raised the UK business tax from April, when US President Donald Trump’s 10 per cent baseline tariff on most goods also took effect.
Citing risks from US tariffs, the Bank of England last week cut its key interest rate by a quarter point to 4 per cent.
“The weak global economy will remain a drag on UK GDP growth for a while yet,” said Ruth Gregory, deputy chief UK economist at Capital Economics.
“The full drag on business investment from April’s tax rises has yet to be felt. And the ongoing speculation about further tax rises in the (UK) autumn budget will probably keep consumers in a cautious mood,” she added.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
US president Donald Trump meets with Indian prime minister Narendra Modi in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 13, 2025. (Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)
INDIAN prime minister Narendra Modi is likely to meet president Donald Trump during a visit to the US next month to attend the UN General Assembly meeting, the Indian Express newspaper reported on Wednesday (13), citing sources.
India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. An Indian official familiar with the matter said a decision has not yet been taken, and that countries usually reserve slots for the General Debate at the assembly, which is why India's "head of government" features in a provisional list of speakers on September 26.
"The list will go through revisions," the official said, adding that it had not yet been decided if Modi would be going to the assembly.
The General Assembly kicks off on September 9, but the debate, the annual meeting of heads of state and government, will be held from September 23-29.
Although the reason for the potential visit will be to attend the UN meeting in New York, a key objective will be to hold talks with Trump and iron out trade and tariff issues that have led to some souring of ties between the two countries, the newspaper reported.
News of a possible Modi trip to the US comes days after Trump announced an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods to penalise New Delhi for continuing to buy Russian oil.
The penalty took the total levy on Indian goods exported to the US to 50 per cent, among the highest levied on any US trading partner.
Trump and Modi arrive to hold a joint press conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 13, 2025. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)getty images
Trade talks between New Delhi and Washington collapsed after five rounds of negotiations over disagreement on opening India's vast farm and dairy sectors and stopping Russian oil purchases.
On Tuesday (12), US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said several large trade agreements were still waiting to be completed, including with Switzerland and India, but New Delhi had been "a bit recalcitrant" in talks with Washington.
Bessent told Fox Business Network's "Kudlow" he hoped the Trump administration could wrap up its trade negotiations by the end of October.
"That's aspirational, but I think we are in a good position," he said, adding "I think we can be, we will have agreed on substantial terms with all the substantial countries."
(Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
Decisions on providing such details have been left to individual forces (Photo: Getty Images)
POLICE forces across the UK have been instructed to consider disclosing the ethnicity and nationality of suspects charged in high-profile and sensitive cases, under new national guidance aimed at improving transparency and reducing the spread of misinformation.
The direction, issued jointly by the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing, came into immediate effect on Wednesday (13).
It advised that forces should release details of a suspect’s background when there is a clear policing purpose, such as tackling false information surrounding an incident or when public safety might be at risk.
Deputy chief constable Sam de Reya, the NPCC lead for communications and media, said the change was designed for “an age of social media where information spreads rapidly — and often inaccurately”.
She added that recent high-profile cases and last summer’s disorder had shown the real-world consequences of what police choose to release. “It is essential that we fill information vacuums with accurate facts of wider public interest,” she explained.
Until now, police communications have typically named suspects, given an age, and provided an address upon charge, without any specific requirement to release nationality, ethnicity, or immigration status.
Decisions on providing such details have been left to individual forces, leading to varied approaches and criticism in some cases.
One of the most prominent recent examples involved two men charged over the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton last month. Reports suggested they were Afghan asylum seekers, but this was not officially confirmed by Warwickshire Police, which followed the existing guidance at the time.
The absence of confirmation prompted claims of a “cover-up” from political figures, including Reform UK’s Nigel Farage. The incident led home secretary Yvette Cooper to call for “more transparency” in such matters. Riots related the Southport killings last year also weighed heavily in the background to this change.
In that case, the absence of early official information about the suspect’s background allowed false claims to spread online, including that the attacker was a Muslim asylum seeker, and riots followed in several parts of England and Northern Ireland.
An independent review later said this misinformation had played a role in sparking disorder. By contrast, Merseyside Police in May quickly confirmed that a man arrested after driving into crowds during Liverpool FC’s Premier League victory parade was a white British national — a move widely credited with quelling speculation about terrorism.
According to reports, the updated guidance said forces should weigh legal, ethical, and fairness concerns before releasing details, with the final decision resting locally.
The NPCC stressed that nothing should be made public if it risks prejudicing a fair trial. The responsibility for verifying a suspect’s immigration status remains with the Home Office, which has said it will authorise the release of such information when “appropriate to do so” at the request of police.
A Home Office spokesperson said both the public and police wanted greater clarity on when and why such details are made available, as well as legitimate reasons for withholding them.
Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson has welcomed the new rules as “a positive step” towards being more open with the public, while underlining the importance of protecting due process. “We want [police] to be as open as possible,” she said, but not in a way that could prejudice a trial.
She noted that the current practice of publishing names and addresses when suspects are charged will now be extended to include nationality and ethnicity, unless there is a strong reason not to do so.
While the move has been applauded by some campaigners and former prosecutors as a way to build trust and counter false stories, others have raised concerns.
Critics warn the guidance could put extra pressure on forces to reveal details in every case, potentially stoking community tensions.
Former Metropolitan Police chief superintendent Dal Babu described a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” situation, saying the expectation to disclose could spark speculation when information is withheld.
Some anti-racism campaigners have also expressed fears that linking crime stories to ethnicity or migration status could fuel prejudice, and they argue that care must be taken to avoid stigmatising communities.
The NPCC insisted the approach is about balance. De Reya said good policing involved “proactively sharing facts to prevent the vacuum that breeds false narratives”, and that communication practices must be fit for the speed and reach of modern media.
Reports revealed that the guidance will be reviewed later in the year.
Keep ReadingShow less
Commuters cross London Bridge on October 15, 2024.
UK's unemployment rate stayed at a four-year high in the three months to June, official data showed on Tuesday, with job vacancies falling during a period that included a UK tax increase and new US tariffs.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the rate was 4.7 per cent, unchanged from March-May, when it reached the highest level since June 2021.
The slowdown in the labour market comes after a business tax rise, announced in the Labour government’s first budget, took effect in April. Analysts had warned the change would likely lead companies to reduce hiring.
April also marked the start of a baseline 10 per cent tariff on the UK and other countries introduced by US President Donald Trump.
"These latest figures point to a continued cooling of the labour market," said Liz McKeown, ONS director of economic statistics.
"The number of employees on payroll has now fallen in ten of the last twelve months, with these falls concentrated in hospitality and retail," she said.
The data showed a small drop in company headcount while wage growth, excluding bonuses, remained steady amid persistent price pressures.
Job vacancies fell by 44,000 in the three months to July to 718,000 — the lowest since April 2021. The ONS said there were signs some firms were not recruiting or replacing departing staff.
"The impact of changes to employer costs in the 2024 Autumn Budget continues to be felt, as well as the ongoing uncertainty in global markets as a result of tariffs," said Joe Nellis, economic adviser at MHA.
"These factors have dampened business confidence and thus recruitment," he said.
Last week, the Bank of England cut its key interest rate by a quarter point to 4 per cent in an effort to support the economy, which is under pressure from US tariffs.
"It's touch and go as to whether there will be a (rate) cut in November but December is looking a bit more likely," said Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump and Narendra Modi shake hands as they attend a joint press conference at the White House on February 13, 2025. (Photo: Reuters)
INDIA expects trade discussions with the United States to continue despite Washington raising tariffs on its exports to 50 per cent over New Delhi’s purchase of sanctioned Russian oil, two lawmakers said on Monday, citing a briefing to a parliamentary panel on foreign affairs.
Last week, US president Donald Trump imposed an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods because of India’s continued purchase of Russian oil. This brought the total duty on Indian exports to 50 per cent, among the highest for any American trading partner.
“Our relations with the US are multi-dimensional, and should not be seen only through the prism of trade,” one lawmaker said, quoting the foreign secretary’s briefing to the panel.
Panel chair Shashi Tharoor, an opposition Congress party leader, said trade talks would proceed as planned.
“As of now, there is no change in the existing plans for the sixth round,” Tharoor said, referring to a scheduled visit of a US trade delegation to New Delhi from August 25.
Earlier, junior finance minister Pankaj Chaudhary told lawmakers that about 55 per cent of India’s merchandise exports to the United States would be covered by the new tariff. His estimate included the initial 25 per cent levy, he said in a written reply to a lawmaker.
“The Department of Commerce is engaged with all stakeholders” for their assessment of the situation, Chaudhary said.
Goods trade between the United States and India was worth about $87 billion in the last fiscal year, according to Indian government estimates.
The panel also discussed reported remarks by Pakistani army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir on nuclear threats in South Asia during a visit to the United States.
“Nuclear blackmail will not work with India, and no party, or representative disagrees with this view,” Tharoor said, adding that the external affairs ministry had condemned the comments.