Starmer calls for unity to rebuild a 'divided Britain'
Prime minister urges pride and shared values after far-right protest, warning the country’s future depends on standing together.
Prime minister Keir Starmer its at a table as he speaks to Israel's president Isaac Herzog (not pictured) to 10 Downing Street on September 10, 2025 in London, England. (Photo by Alberto Pezzali - WPA Pool/Getty Images)
Pramod Thomas is a senior correspondent with Asian Media Group since 2020, bringing 19 years of journalism experience across business, politics, sports, communities, and international relations. His career spans both traditional and digital media platforms, with eight years specifically focused on digital journalism. This blend of experience positions him well to navigate the evolving media landscape and deliver content across various formats. He has worked with national and international media organisations, giving him a broad perspective on global news trends and reporting standards.
PRIME MINISTER Sir Keir Starmer has called on Britons to reject hatred and division and instead work together to rebuild the country through unity, pride, and shared values.
In a personal and powerful message in the Sun for Sunday (21), Starmer warned that the UK faced a choice between a future of national renewal or a dangerous slide into division fuelled by populist voices.
His comments followed a mass protest earlier this month in London, where more than 100,000 people marched under the banner “Unite the Kingdom.” The protest, led by far-right figure Tommy Robinson and joined remotely by US tech billionaire Elon Musk, saw violent clashes with police, flares set off, and monuments scaled. Some demonstrators carried nationalist slogans and symbols, prompting concerns about the growing influence of extremist views.
Starmer criticized the violence and rhetoric and condemned those who are exploiting people’s frustrations to push hate and fear. He said while many people feel left behind, working harder but falling further behind, the answer was not to turn against one another.
“We’ve seen police officers assaulted. We’ve seen a nine-year-old black girl shot in a racist attack. Chinese takeaways have been defaced. That sends a shiver down the spine of every right-minded Brit. This is not who we are,” he wrote.
Reflecting on his own memories, Starmer recalled the 1996 Euros semi-final at Wembley Stadium, where fans across the country united behind the England football team. He described the feeling of standing in a crowd filled with flags and energy, where everyone - regardless of race, class, or background - cheered together for their country.
“That’s the power of our flag,” he said. “To make us all feel like part of Team England. Win or lose, north or south, black or white, old or young. Even Spurs and Arsenal were on the same team that day.”
Starmer argued that this kind of unity should be the foundation for Britain’s future, not the anger and fear promoted by populist figures. Without naming Musk, Robinson or Reform leader Nigel Farage, he criticised attempts to divide the country for their own gain, offering “no hope, no future, no answers,” only chaos and mistrust.
Starmer acknowledged that years of austerity and economic decline have left many people struggling. Public services have been stretched, high streets have emptied, and trust in politics has eroded. But rather than fuelling hatred, he said, the country must come together to rebuild.
He called for the chance for national renewal, where every person can play a part in creating a stronger and more united Britain.
Starmer pointed out how the Labour government is taking action - investing in housing, health, and childcare - to ease the burden on families and restore pride in the country.
Beyond policies, Starmer stressed the importance of identity and belonging. He said true patriotism means standing together, not turning against neighbours. The prime minister said, “This is a struggle for the heart and soul of our nation. But it’s not between ordinary people who want a better life. It’s between patriots who care about our country, and populists who only care about themselves.”
He made a call for hope, recalling the feeling of togetherness at Wembley nearly 30 years ago. “I want the electricity I felt in that stadium. A defiant Britain, a nation of decency and diversity, that still dares to stand together and believe in better.”
The answer to Britain’s problems was not in division, but in unity, pride, and a renewed belief in the power of community, he said
Starmer said Britain was formally recognising the State of Palestine "to revive the hope of peace for the Palestinians and Israelis, and a two-state solution
Britain, Australia, Canada and Portugal recognised the State of Palestine on Sunday (21), a historic shift in decades of Western foreign policy that drew swift anger from Israel and a rebuke from the United States.
The UK prime minister Keir Starmer said Britain was formally recognising the State of Palestine "to revive the hope of peace for the Palestinians and Israelis, and a two-state solution".
Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip welcomed the recognition as a victory, but Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed in response that a Palestinian state would never exist.
The United States also criticised the moves as "performative" and said it was focused on finding a diplomatic solution to the Israel-Hamas conflict.
Other countries, including France, are also due to recognise a Palestinian state during key talks at the annual UN General Assembly that opened on Monday (22) in New York.
Israel has come under huge international pressure over its war in Gaza, which has sparked a dire humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian territory.
Netanyahu denounced the push for recognition as "absurd", claiming it would "endanger" Israel's existence. "It will not happen. No Palestinian state will be established west of the Jordan River," the Israeli premier said.
He later vowed to expand Jewish settlements in the West Bank, which Israel has controlled since 1967 in an occupation considered illegal under international law.
Britain and Canada became the first members of the Group of Seven advanced economies to take the step.
The United States -- a staunch ally of Israel -- said its "focus remains on serious diplomacy, not performative gestures".
"Our priorities are clear: the release of the hostages, the security of Israel, and peace and prosperity for the entire region that is only possible free from Hamas," a State Department spokesperson said on condition of anonymity.
The moves are a watershed moment for Palestinians and their ambitions for statehood, with the most powerful Western nations having long argued recognition should only come as part of a negotiated peace deal with Israel.
Three-quarters of UN members now recognise the State of Palestine, with at least 145 of the 193 member countries having done so, according to an AFP tally.
Australia's prime minister Anthony Albanese said the move "recognises the legitimate and long held aspirations of the people of Palestine", while Portuguese foreign minister Paulo Rangel called the two-state solution "the only path to a just and lasting peace".
On the ground in Gaza, many saw recognition as an affirmation of their existence after nearly two years of war between Israel and Palestinian Islamist group Hamas.
"This recognition shows that the world is finally starting to hear our voice and that in itself is a moral victory," said Salwa Mansour, 35, who has been displaced from the southern city of Rafah to Al-Mawasi.
"Despite all the pain, death and massacres we're living through, we cling to anything that brings even the smallest bit of hope," she added.
Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas hailed the recognitions as "an important and necessary step toward achieving a just and lasting peace".
Although a largely symbolic move, it puts the four countries at odds with the United States and Israel. US president Donald Trump said last week after talks with Starmer that "one of our few disagreements" was over Palestinian statehood. (AFP)
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
AN ASIAN Church of England bishop has used a sermon in northern England to appeal for racial harmony, urging his congregation to reclaim the country’s St George’s flag and the Christian faith from divisive forces.
Right Reverend Arun Arora, Bishop of Kirkstall, was addressing a service on Wednesday (17) evening in east Leeds, near the Britannia Hotel – the site of regular protests against asylum seekers being housed there.
As the Church of England’s co-lead Bishop for Racial Justice, Arora also condemned the racially aggravated sexual assault on a Sikh woman in Oldbury, West Midlands, last week.
“The serious sexual assault of a young Sikh woman in the West Midlands last week is reported to have been accompanied by perpetrators telling her she should go back to her own country,” Bishop Arora said.
“Such incidents have followed weeks of hotel protests and flag-flying across the nation with barely concealed racist overtones. Sentiments that even five years ago would have been considered shameful are now being broadcast at public gatherings, accompanied by cheers and applause. Such sentiments have been accompanied by reckless voices of hate seeking to camouflage themselves in the language of patriotism and faith – all the while debasing both."
He appealed for people to “reclaim both the flag and the faith that is being desecrated by those who would use both to divide us as a nation”, lamenting the “rising toxic tide of racism – the sin of racism”, whose impact, he said, was being felt across the country.
“As followers of Christ our duty is clear: to challenge those whose lips drip with vituperation and hate, to refute division and to restore dignity in building the common good. To oppose the racist sin that refuses to recognise God in our neighbour, and instead to advocate a way of peace. To stand with those who fear this rising tension – with the Muslim, Sikh, Jew and Hindu,” the bishop said.
His sermon came just days after a massive anti-immigration protest, organised by far-right activist Tommy Robinson, turned violent over the weekend.
“Both in the face of those bleeding from the violence visited upon them and the screaming face contorted by hate, God calls us to love them equally and, where possible, for the church to be a bridge between them both,” he noted.
Born and raised in Birmingham, Arora has long been a member of the Church of England and was consecrated as Bishop of Kirkstall at York Minster Cathedral three years ago.
(PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
Keir Starmer speaks at a press conference at Chequers, near Aylesbury, Britain, September 18, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
A SECOND flight deporting a migrant from the UK to France took off on Friday (19), after he lost a legal challenge to stay his return, the Home Office said.
The deportee was believed to be an Eritrean man whose removal got the green light after he lost an 11th-hour legal challenge in the High Court on Thursday (18) night.
He had arrived on UK shores on a small boat in August, and asked to delay his deportation to be allowed to challenge it, arguing he was allegedly a victim of human trafficking.
But High Court judge Justice Sheldon said late Thursday there was "no serious issue to be tried in this case" and said there was "significant public interest in favour of this claimant's removal".
Lawyers acting on behalf of the man told the court he was scheduled to leave on a flight to France at 6.15am (5.15 GMT) on Friday.
The Home Office confirmed a second flight had taken off Friday, without giving any numbers or details.
But government minister Peter Kyle told ITV channel: "Today we have the second flight taking off with a migrant who doesn't have the right to stay here being returned."
The removal is a small victory for prime minister Keir Starmer, after the first returns under the UK-France "one-in, one-out" deal were stymied earlier this week by legal challenges.
A different Eritrean man had his removal temporarily blocked on Tuesday (16) by the High Court, which gave him 14 days to provide proof of his claims he was a victim of trafficking.
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said she "will continue to challenge any last-minute, vexatious attempts to frustrate a removal in the courts".
Kyle admitted the Labour government was "pushing the boundaries of the law."
"If we have to change the law, we will change the law," added Kyle.
The first migrant, an Indian man, was returned to France on Thursday under the new deal with France under which it can detain and deport irregular migrants deemed ineligible for asylum.
In return, London will accept an equal number of migrants from France who can apply for a UK visa via an online platform under the pilot scheme which came into effect in August and will run until June 2026.
UK media reported that "hundreds" of migrants had set off from France early Friday, attempting to cross the Channel on small boats to the UK.
(Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
FILE PHOTO: Mourners carry the coffins of victims who died in the Air India Flight 171 crash, for funeral ceremony in Ahmedabad on June 21, 2025. (Photo: Getty Images)
FAMILIES of four passengers who died in the Air India crash in June have filed a lawsuit in a US court against Boeing and Honeywell International, alleging that a faulty fuel cut-off switch caused the disaster.
The case, filed in Delaware Superior Court by The Lanier Law Firm, seeks compensatory and punitive damages for the wrongful deaths of four passengers on flight AI171.
On June 12, the Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner operating flight AI171 to London Gatwick crashed shortly after take-off from Ahmedabad, killing 260 people, including 241 passengers. It was one of the worst air disasters in India in more than three decades.
According to the lawsuit, flight data shows that a pilot accidentally cut off fuel to the aircraft’s engines just seconds after take-off, leading to a complete loss of thrust. The fuel cut-off switch, manufactured by Honeywell and installed by Boeing, is supposed to have a locking mechanism to prevent accidental shut-off.
India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), which is probing the crash, said in its preliminary report that the fuel switches were cut off within one second of each other, causing confusion in the cockpit before the plane plunged into a building. Cockpit voice recordings captured one pilot asking the other why he had cut the switch, to which the second pilot denied doing so.
The lawsuit alleges that the switches are located just behind the thrust levers, an area of “high traffic” during take-off. Documents cited in the case suggest that both Boeing and Honeywell knew the locking mechanism could be easily disengaged or even absent.
A 2018 Federal Aviation Administration report reportedly confirmed the issue, but the companies did not alert airlines or provide replacement switches, according to the law firm.
“This defect is like putting an emergency brake next to a radio knob in a car. But unlike a car, restarting jet engines takes minutes, not seconds,” said Benjamin Major of The Lanier Law Firm. “Once the engines shut down, the aircraft essentially became a 250,000-pound lawn dart.”
Meanwhile, the family of Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, one of the pilots who died in the crash, has asked for a formal government investigation.
His 91-year-old father, Pushkaraj Sabharwal, wrote to the civil aviation secretary and the AAIB, saying that leaks from the inquiry had led to damaging speculation about his son’s mental state. He said such innuendos had caused him deep distress and tarnished his son’s reputation.
The AAIB is continuing its inquiry into the cause of the crash, which remains one of the deadliest aviation tragedies in India since the 1990s.
(PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
Swaminarayan Akshardham temple in Robbinsville, New Jersey
BAPS has welcomed the decision of the US Justice Department to close its investigation into alleged worker exploitation during the construction of its Swaminarayan Akshardham temple in Robbinsville, New Jersey.
The inquiry began in 2021 after a group of Indian workers filed a lawsuit in the District Court of New Jersey. They accused the organisation of human trafficking and wage violations, claiming they had been paid as little as $1 a day while building the vast temple complex.
The workers alleged they were confined to the site and forced to work long hours under difficult and, at times, unsafe conditions.
At the time, The New York Times reported that more than 200 Indian nationals had travelled to the US on religious ‘R-1’ visas from around 2018 to work on the project. The lawsuit said six men were among those subjected to gruelling hours and restricted freedom during construction.
The allegations led to strong criticism of BAPS, with questions raised about labour rights, immigration rules, and the treatment of religious workers in the US. The case drew international media attention and cast a shadow over what was meant to be a landmark project for the Hindu community in North America.
On Thursday (18), the Justice Department and the US Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey confirmed that they had ended their investigation. No violations were established, bringing to a close a four-year period of scrutiny for the organisation.
BAPS North America welcomed the outcome, saying it reaffirmed its position that the temple was built through the devotion, voluntary service, and contributions of thousands of followers. The organisation acknowledged that the allegations had been a “challenging” moment but said it now moved forward with renewed strength and confidence.
It also described the Akshardham temple as a symbol of peace and service, and as a marker of the Hindu community’s growing presence in the US.
The Coalition of Hindus of North America (CoHNA) also expressed relief at the closure of the investigation. It said the case had been used to target the broader Hindu faith and community, despite the allegations remaining unproven.
While welcoming the Justice Department’s decision, CoHNA argued that the community had suffered reputational harm and called for accountability from those who had, in its view, spread misinformation.
BAPS further noted that the Hindu community in America is still comparatively young but has established itself as an integral part of the nation’s religious landscape. The temple in Robbinsville, it said, now stands as an enduring example of faith, dedication, and cultural contribution.
The US Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey declined to comment on the decision.
BAPS said it hoped Akshardham would continue to be recognised not for controversy, but for its art, architecture, and the spirit of devotion and service it represents.