Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Rahul Gandhi to appeal conviction in defamation case

Senior Congress figures, including Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and the chief ministers of three Congress-ruled states, as well as national and state party leaders, will join him at the court

Rahul Gandhi to appeal conviction in defamation case

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi is expected to visit Surat city in Gujarat on Monday (03) to file an appeal in court against his criminal defamation conviction for his "Modi surname" comments.

According to sources, senior Congress figures, including Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and the chief ministers of three Congress-ruled states, as well as national and state party leaders, are anticipated to join him at the court. The sessions court is expected to hear the case on the same day, as per Gandhi's legal representatives.


According to sources, Gandhi will request that his sentence be suspended by the sessions court. He is expected to arrive in Surat at approximately 2 pm, as per Congress insiders. Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot and Congress Rajya Sabha member K C Venugopal, along with other senior party leaders, will also be present in Surat.

As Gandhi heads to court, Congress General Secretary Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel, and Himachal Pradesh CM Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu are also anticipated to be in the city, the sources said.

On March 23, the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate H H Varma convicted Gandhi, 52, and sentenced him to two years in prison in a 2019 criminal defamation case, after he made "Modi surname" comments that were the subject of the lawsuit.

He was found guilty under sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code. However, the court granted him bail and suspended the sentence for 30 days, giving him time to appeal to a higher court.

Following his conviction, the former Congress leader was disqualified from the Lok Sabha on March 24. This would prevent him from running for election for eight years unless his conviction and sentence are overturned by a higher court.

The case was filed against Gandhi by Bharatiya Janata Party MLA and former Gujarat minister Purnesh Modi, in relation to the alleged remark made by the Congress leader, "How come all thieves have Modi as the common surname?"

In April 2019, while campaigning for the Lok Sabha elections, Rahul Gandhi made the "Modi surname" comments at a rally in Kolar, Karnataka. His subsequent two-year prison sentence led to his disqualification from Parliament as per the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which mandates the disqualification of an MP or MLA upon conviction and sentencing for a minimum of two years.

(With inputs from PTI)

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Tackling hostility against Muslims matters for everyone

Anti immigration protesters attend the 'Glasgow Reclaims The Streets From Far-right Hatred And Violence' anti-racism protest on June 13, 2026 in Glasgow, Scotland.

Getty Images

Tackling hostility against Muslims matters for everyone

Sunder Katwala

Born in the mid-1970s I felt part of a lucky generation, which gained from pushing back the overt racism of that era. When we talk about stronger “social norms”, what we mean is that few people thought that monkey chants at the football or racist jokes on the telly were normal anymore – while more had Asian and black colleagues, neighbours and friends.

That past progress is put to the test today. A terrible crime in Belfast saw organised efforts at indiscriminate racist attacks on migrants and ethnic minorities, whose only connection to the crime was the colour of their skin. Those seeking to make racism fashionable again have the online megaphone of the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, on their side.

Past progress could be experienced unevenly, too. Being of mixed Indian and Irish Catholic parentage, I saw both identities rise in status once the BBC comedy Goodness Gracious Me inverted who could tell the jokes, and peace broke out in Northern Ireland. Yet, British Muslims of my generation felt under more intense scrutiny after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Efforts to tackle anti-Muslim hatred risked being stalled by arguments over what to call it and how to define it. The government’s new definition of anti-Muslim hostility seeks to transcend the confusion that the term “Islamophobia” could generate. But the challenge is not just to define the prejudice – but to find effective ways to shrink it.

There are sobering findings on the starting points in new research from British Future and the British Muslim Trust. More than half of British Muslims report experiencing prejudice based on their religion last year – a quarter in person and over a third online. A third of the public hold mostly negative views. One in six endorse sweeping and often indiscriminate hostility. Anti-Muslim hostility can have about twice the social reach as prejudice against other faith or ethnic minorities.

Tackling this hostility cannot be the responsibility of Muslims alone. It will take a whole-of-society effort. After all, this is foundationally about the attitudes towards a six per cent minority group, held among the 94 per cent of us who are not Muslim.

Keep ReadingShow less