Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Politics of flying Union flags

By Amit Roy

NAGA MUNCHETTY, who giggled and said, “Always a flag”, when her BBC Breakfast co-presenter, Char­lie Stayt, poked fun at the size of the Union flag in Robert Jenrick’s office when they were interview­ing the housing and communities secretary, can claim credit for changing government policy.


The Union flag is to be flown all government buildings, not just on special occasions, but every day.

Jenrick declared: “Our nation’s flag is a symbol of liberty, unity and freedom that creates a shared sense of civic pride. People rightly expect to see the Union flag flying high on civic and government buildings up and down the coun­try, as a sign of our local and na­tional identity.”

The guidance was announced by culture secretary Oliver Dow­den: “The Union flag unites us as a nation and people rightly expect it to be flown above UK govern­ment buildings.”

That’s fair enough, except that if the flags are out all the time, it’s human nature for the public to stop noticing them after a while. It’s like biryani: it won’t seem spe­cial if people have it every day.

There’s also the risk that far from encouraging patriotism, the proliferation of flags will make ethnic minorities fear the British National Party has taken over.

It is also by no means certain that the Scots and the Welsh will welcome the diktat from London. On trips to Scotland, the Saltire has made it feel like I am in an­other country.

Welsh first minister Mark Drak­eford has expressed his doubts: “It’s part of the UK government’s attempt to roll back devolution in an aggressively unilateral way. I want Wales to be part of a successful United Kingdom. Aggressive unilateral actions of this sort just feed nationalism in different parts of the UK. It’s a counter-produc­tive strategy. Forcing it on people really is counter-productive.”

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

When protest becomes a pogrom: The Home Office must draw a clearer line

An anti-migrant protest in Glasgow’s Possilpark on July 11, 2026, amid rising tensions and violence over migration across parts of UK

Getty Images

When protest becomes a pogrom: The Home Office must draw a clearer line

Sunder Katwala

IT TOOK three nights of violence in Thetford, Norfolk for the police to restore order. A crowd chanted “get them out” and “deport, deport, deport” as they pelted a house with eggs and smashed the windows. Several dozen people tried to break down the door, hoping to confront the people inside, violently attacking the police who blocked them.

This violent criminality was not political protest, but an attempt at a xenophobic pogrom to drive out asylum seekers housed in the property. The police relocated them elsewhere for their own safety. That felt like ‘mission accomplished’ for the angry crowd. Online, extremists suggested other places could target asylum seekers’ homes to emulate Thetford’s success. Disorder in Belfast and Epping had seen a crime, committed by an asylum seeker, used to mobilise collective punishment against migrants and other ethnic minorities. Nobody involved in the Thetford disorder suggested those in the house targeted had caused any trouble. The mere presence of asylum seekers in the town was perceived as a threat – from “illegals” or “invaders”.

Keep ReadingShow less