Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

‘Debate must include assisted dying bill’s impact on society as a whole’

Opposing views on the bill should be heard from Asian and other groups

‘Debate must include assisted dying bill’s impact on society as a whole’
The second reading of the bill was passed by the Commons last Friday (29) by 330 votes to 275, which shows MPs are as divided on this issue as the rest of the country.

“WELL, Rameshbhai,” murmured the medic, gently adjusting the patient’s pillow, “your near and dear ones have asked me to have a word with you.

“They are grateful for the large inheritance you are leaving. It’s not about the money. It’s just that they don’t want you to suffer any more. They have the documents ready. All you have do to sign them. They will then ‘do the needful’. They can make all your pain vanish in a second. They want to show their love for you.”


Greater love hath no man (or woman) than someone willing to lay down a relative’s life in pursuance of Kim Leadbeater’s Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) bill. It is a piece of legislation that would supposedly “give dying people, under stringent criteria, choice, autonomy and dignity at the end of their lives”.

The second reading of the bill was passed by the Commons last Friday (29) by 330 votes to 275, which shows MPs are as divided on this issue as the rest of the country.

The answer you get in opinion polls depends on the question.

If the question is, “Would you support the principle of assisted dying for a terminally ill patient in intolerable pain with fewer than six months to live?”, you might get a yes.

But the answer might be quite different if the question is, “Would you – yes, you – like to be pushed in front of a speeding train if you wanted to end it all?”

All right, let’s not be too brutal: “Honestly, Rameshbhai, you won’t feel a thing. We will give you some pills and we promise you will find peace.”

The British Asian community, which has so far tended to look after elderly folk at home, hasn’t been consulted at all about assisted dying.

Leadbeater, the Labour MP for Spen Valley – her MP sister Jo Cox was murdered by a neoNazi in 2016 – gave the Commons examples of people who were denied assisted dying.

Barry Gardiner

For example, “Warwick,” she told the Commons, “was married to his wife Ann for nearly 40 years. She had terminal peritoneal cancer, which meant she could not breathe properly. She spent four days gasping and choking, remaining awake throughout despite being given the maximum dose of sedatives. She eventually died of suffocation. She had begged Warwick to end her life, but as he stood over her with a pillow, he could not do what she asked as he did not want that to be her final memory of him. Ann had excellent palliative care, but it simply could not ease her suffering.”

She gave the cost for those who chose Dignitas: “If they have £10,000 or £15,000, they can make the trip to Switzerland or elsewhere but, because of the current legal position, it is often a deeply distressing and very lonely experience, shrouded in secrecy, with people feeling like criminals as the fear of prosecution hangs over them.”

Several MPs raised legitimate concerns, among them Danny Kruger, the Tory MP for East Wiltshire.

“The point about process is that this bill is too flawed; there is too much to do to it to address in committee,” he argued.

He didn’t mince his words: “The likelihood is that we would see a new branch of medicine spring up, like the medics I met in Canada. These medics ... are specialists in assisted death and personally kill hundreds of patients a year in their special clinics.”

Richard Burgon, independent member for Leeds East, said: “One thing that concerns me is societal or systemic coercion. At the moment, elderly people in our society pay thousands of pounds a month to be in a care home. What reassurances can my honourable friend give that an elderly person in a care home who has been given six months to live would not think, ‘I’m a burden. I have been given six months to live. If I end my life now, I can save my family between £25,000 and £55,000.’ That really concerns me.”

Another independent MP, Shockat Adam, representing Leicester South, remarked: “As a medical professional who is surrounded by even more senior medical professionals, I know we can all miss things when there are tangibles in front of us – the shadows on xrays and the markers on blood tests. As professionals, we miss things that can be seen. What security will we have that we can pick up things that we cannot see, like coercion?”

Blair McDougall, Labour MP for East Renfrewshire, said: “I started the debate where she is now, but I have moved to opposing the bill by the stories I have heard of disabled people who have had ‘do not resuscitate’ put on their medical records without their permission, or who have been stopped by strangers in the street and been told, ‘You would be better off dead.’ ”

Barry Gardiner, the Labour MP for Brent West, who has many Asians in his constituency, commented: “My concern is she has focused today on the individual and the individual choice, but we are here to legislate for society as a whole.

In legislating, what we are saying if we pass the bill is it is ok to take that choice and there will be some people who have six months of their life to go who will then feel, ‘Ought I to do this? Is this something that I now should do?’

“That brings into play a whole set of considerations – ‘Is it better for my family? Is it financially better for my family?’– in ways that, at the moment, are out of scope. Rather than simply focusing on the individual suffering, which we all recognise is acute, we must broaden the debate to the impact that the legislation will have on society as a whole.”

Saqib Bhatti

Diane Abbott, Labour MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington, and the ‘mother of the House’, pointed out: “If the bill passes, we will have the NHS as a 100 per cent funded suicide service”.

Robert Jenrick, MP for Newark who lost to Kemi Badenoch in the Tory leadership contest, made sense when he declared: “Bad law on trivial things is bad enough – I have seen a lot of that in my time in the House – but bad law on matters of life and death is unforgivable.”

Dr Simon Opher, Labour member for Stroud and a GP for 30 years, revealed: “A lot of patients who are dying of cancer ask whether we can curtail their life and finish it a bit early.

“I have had two patients go to Dignitas on their own, without family members... ...We have been discussing giving a double dose of morphine. I think that almost all doctors in terminal care have probably done this – doubled the dose of morphine knowing that it might curtail the patient’s life. That is a big fudge.”

Saqib Bhatti, Tory MP for Meriden and Solihull East, commented: “I have yet to be convinced that the legislation has sufficient safeguards in place. On slippery slopes, take Canada as an example – there, someone does not even have to have a terminal or fatal illness now; mental illness will be an acceptable reason for assisted suicide in 2027.

“I worry that in the future, we will look back at this, after there has been abuse or coercion of some of the most vulnerable people, and we will come back to the House to discuss the damage that we have caused.”

The British Asian voice on the bill, both for and against assisted dying, should be heard before it becomes law.

More For You

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less
If ayatollahs fall, who will run Teheran next?

Portraits of Iranian military generals and nuclear scientists, killed in Israel’s last Friday (13) attack, are seen above a road, as heavy smoke rises from an oil refinery in southern Teheran hit in an overnight Israeli strike last Sunday (15)

If ayatollahs fall, who will run Teheran next?

THERE is one question to which none of us has the answer: if the ayatollahs are toppled, who will take over in Teheran?

I am surprised that Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei, has lasted as long as he has. He is 86, and would achieve immortality as a “martyr” in the eyes of regime supporters if the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, succeeded in assassinating him. This was apparently Netanyahu’s plan, though he was apparently dissuaded by US president Donald Trump from going ahead with the killing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Talking about race isn’t racist – ignoring it helped grooming gangs thrive

A woman poses with a sign as members of the public queue to enter a council meeting during a protest calling for justice for victims of sexual abuse and grooming gangs, outside the council offices at City Centre on January 20, 2025 in Oldham, England

Getty Images

Comment: Talking about race isn’t racist – ignoring it helped grooming gangs thrive

WAS a national inquiry needed into so-called grooming gangs? Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer did not think so in January, but now accepts Dame Louise Casey’s recommendation to commission one.

The previous Conservative government – having held a seven-year national inquiry into child sexual abuse – started loudly championing a new national inquiry once it lost the power to call one. Casey explains why she changed her mind too after her four-month, rapid audit into actions taken and missed on group-based exploitation and abuse. A headline Casey theme is the ‘shying away’ from race.

Keep ReadingShow less