Seaman's account reveals a few marines may have introduced the game
MID-DECEMBER, 1721. Three hundred years ago this very fortnight, the first known cricketing on Indian soil took place.
The reference comes in a confused, if lively, History of the Indian Wars (1737), composed by an unreliable able seaman, Clement Downing, seeking re-employment with the British East India Company.
Shipping records substantiate details of his account.
Two country-built boats in the service of the Company, the Emilia sloop and the Hunter galley, had sailed from Bombay to protect the many smaller craft bringing bales of Indian goods down the coast from the fabled trading entrepôt of Cambay.
Tacking through the treacherous banks of the Gulf of Cambay to evade attacks from Kanohji Angria’s Maratha navy and hostile Kathiawari sea-farers from Sultanpur and Beyt, the two boats missed the spring tide that would have taken them over the bar towards the fast silting-up Cambay. Instead, they turned aside into the Dhadhar River to lay up in the productive cotton-growing and manufacturing Jambusar pargana.
After a tender left taking the two ship’s captains, Hearing and Doggett, up to Cambay, the crews of the ships, in the charge of Lieutenants Stevens and Rathbone, diverted themselves for nearly a fortnight at cricket and other exercises.
The directors of the Company back in London, had they known, would have had a fit.
The British were quite literally all at sea on the west coast at this time, unwelcome in Surat and clinging on to a toehold in the pestilential swamp of Bombay.
The big contending land powers were the Mughal satraps and the resurgent Marathas.
Downing himself is glad to find service with Rustum Ali Khan in Vadodara just as other Brits are with the Marathas.
Among the European traders, the Dutch are the dominant presence and on land Downing, discretely clothed in local dress, hitches a ride on their caravans or with the Armenians.
Even so, the British Company is doing enough business across the country in silks and cottons to cause the London weavers to riot and throw acid over women wearing the fashionable Indian calicoes.
Goaded by the rabble-rousing pamphleteering of Daniel Defoe, an Act of Parliament is passed in 1721 banning the wearing of them.
Exactly who was playing this cricket on the banks of the Dhadhar? That we do not, and cannot, know for sure, but we can deduce a few things. On the Emilia there are three Europeans and 18 Indians.
Less certain is the composition of crew on the Hunter, larger for being a galley, but scorned by the Company for being so small. At a guess there might be some 10 Europeans aboard, not necessarily English, and 50 Indians. Exceptionally, for this expedition, 12 marines off a newly-arrived warship, the London, have been seconded to the Hunter.
Once the detachment of perhaps half a dozen Europeans and 20 Indians have gone on up to Cambay, we may guess 20 Europeans and 50 Indians are left on the riverbank. Upon landing, expecting attacks from local raiding Mahi Kanta Kolis, they throw a defensive ring round their encampment. This is on pasturage where the cotton and grain plantations begin and there is fresh water.
That everyone present had to take part in the exercises there can be no doubt. These exercises are a drill, this is a military operation, all at the ready, though by the end of the fortnight the drill does seem to have shaded into recreation.
However, to say all exercised is not to say all played cricket.
It’s a pound to a penny that it was some of the marines off the London who introduced the cricket. This rural working people’s pastime was only just emerging from the shadows and was still known only in the extreme south-east of England.
The London had sailed out of Gravesend and that part of Kent was then famous for having the best cricketers of all. It is possible the lads off the London kept the game to themselves, but extremely unlikely. Cricket delighted in putting together oddball teams and over nearly a fortnight in a festive run-up to Christmas they would probably have involved as many of the others as possible, having to teach the game to everybody else, whether European or Indian.
Forget Lagaan: 1721 is not 1893. The British officers concerned show themselves to be respectful of the Indians – on whom their lives depend – and their customs.
Captain Herring tells Downing his predecessor Captain Sedgewick brought his own death on himself by inadvisedly firing on Kolis at the mouth of the Dhadhar. While the nature of his request may make some shudder, Lieutenant Rathbone actually asks permission if he may shoot a peacock (presumably for Christmas dinner).
Downing, even as he is involved in Rustum Ali Khan’s punitive attacks on the Kolis (for failing to pay lagaan, or tax), praises them for their industry and egalitarianism.
All parties recruit the Gogharis from across the Gulf, so respected are they for their unyielding bravery.
The real question may be whether the Indians would agree to engage in the cricket. Their serangs had a lot of say in what their crews did. After diverse other exercises had been gone through during a week or more onshore, Rathbone may well have turned to his bosun and said: Come on, Bosie, have a bat. Give it a go. We do know that, by then, another factor was kicking in. The defensive ring round the pasture had been surprised to be facing not raiders but curious onlookers.
Anatomy of Cricket in India author JohnDrew looks at a picture of Ranji at Rajkumar College.
Initially, a large procession issued from Jambusar, armed Kolis on guard at its head, to find out what was happening down by the river. Far from attacking, they were evidently intrigued by what they saw for they came down several more times. Since Downing singles out cricket from the other exercises, we may surmise it was this rather than anything else that brought them back.
What might have intrigued them?
Well, the cricket resembled a martial art in that something like a cannonball was hurled along the ground at a man with a curved wooden sword defending a target (two short sticks topped by one twice their length). If this defender hit the ball he would run, but without attacking whoever picked up the ball. Intriguing indeed: mock warfare with little physical contact or injury. No wonder word spread, and this veritable Bharat Army returned to watch some more.
This being so, was the defensive ring facing out free to turn inwards and field instead? While the guard would never have been let down in a hostile situation, there would have been a changing of the guard and so the likelihood of a turn and turn about exists.
We do know the cricketalia (as this mixed form, common on fair-grounds and estates in 18th century Kent, was once called) proved (relatively) disarming.
Although still armed, a foraging party was encouraged by the unexpectedly peaceful turn of events to set out at the end of the fortnight in search of provisions at a Koli settlement, probably Tankaria. The Patel agreed to allow Rathbone to trade so long as his party remained civil. Among other things, they purchased two bullocks at `20 each and two sheep at `2 each, besides a dozen fowls and some flour and butter.
At the conclusion of the trading, the interpreter warned Rathbone that he didn't like the look of several Kolis cutting and sweeping with their – probably Bharuchi – swords. Rathbone was unfazed.
Perhaps he imagined that, among those who had come to watch the cricket, there were Kolis who already fancied themselves as batsmen?
John Drew, formerly a student of Chanchi Mehta’s at MSU, is author of India and the Romantic Imagination (Oxford India). He plays cricket for Clare Hall, Cambridge.
Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission and Keir Starmer, prime minister of the UK greet each other, ahead of their bilateral meeting at the 6th European Political Community summit on May 16, 2025 at Skanderbeg Square in Tirana, Albania. Leon Neal/Pool via REUTERS
PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer is set to sign a new deal with the EU seeking to reset ties after Brexit, his office said ahead of landmark talks.
Starmer will meet on Monday (19) with EU chiefs for the first post-Brexit EU-UK summit aimed at agreeing steps towards a closer relationship between Britain and the 27-country bloc which it left five years ago after an acrimonious and knife-edge referendum.
"This week, the prime minister will strike yet another deal that will deliver in the national interest of this country," Downing Street said in a statement, also pointing to recent trade deals with the US and India.
Britain left the EU in 2020, but the prime minister has been trying to boost ties with the country's biggest trading partner.
Starmer will welcome EU bosses Ursula von der Leyen and Antonio Costa as well as top EU diplomat Kaja Kallas for Monday's talks at the storied Lancaster House venue in London.
"The prime minister will set out how a strengthened, forward-looking partnership with the European Union will deliver for working people and lead to more money in pockets," the statement said.
Talks looked set however to go down to the wire due to last-minute squabbling over long-standing issues, such as fishing rights and food checks.
But negotiators were hopeful of at least signing a defence and security partnership.
Starmer, elected Labour prime minister last July, wants a deeper relationship with the European Union than the one negotiated by the previous Tory government.
That deal "isn't working for anyone", Starmer's office said.
The move is aimed at opening the door to closer cooperation as both the EU and Britain race to rearm in the face of the threat from Russia and fears the US under president Donald Trump will no longer help protect Europe.
That should mean more regular security talks, Britain considering joining EU military missions and the potential for London to fully tap into a $167 billion (£137bn) defence fund being set up by the bloc.
But Starmer has several red lines he has said he will not cross, while sticking points remain over some EU demands that threaten to stall the rapprochement.
In an interview with The Times on Saturday (17), Starmer said a deal would be a "really significant moment".
Starmer has ruled out rejoining the customs union and single market but has suggested that the UK is ready for regulatory alignment with the EU on food and agricultural products.
EU diplomats in Brussels have been working on getting Britain to keep its waters open for European fishermen in return for easing the checks on some food imports from the UK.
And Starmer appeared to have made a key concession by agreeing to an EU demand and clearing the way to let young Europeans live and work in Britain under a youth mobility scheme.
While freedom of movement was a "red line," he told The Times, "youth mobility is not freedom of movement".
Starmer is approaching the scheme cautiously under pressure from rising support for Nigel Farage's anti-immigration and Euro-sceptic party Reform UK, which made huge gains in local elections earlier this month.
He said late Saturday in a statement that on Monday "we take another step forwards, with yet more benefits for the UK as the result of a strengthened partnership with the European Union".
"In this time of great uncertainty and volatility, the UK will not respond by turning inwards, but by proudly taking our place on the world stage."
Susan Stronge was understandably a little emotional as she spoke to Eastern Eye last Monday (5), the final day of the exhibition on The Great Mughals: Art, Architecture and Opulence, the exhibition she curated at the Victoria and Albert Museum.
The exhibition opened on 9 November 2024 to celebrate “the extraordinary creative output and internationalist culture of the golden age of the Mughal court (about 1560–1660), during the reigns of its most famous emperors: Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jahan.”
There was a large crowd on the last day to catch one more glimpse of the jewellery, paintings, armour, textiles, carpets and other works of art before they were taken down to make way for the next exhibition, Marie Antoinette Style: Shaped by the most fashionable queen in history, in September.
By any reckoning, The Great Mughals has been a huge success. On the final day, Stronge wandered through the gallery, listening to visitors’ chatter – few of them aware she was the curator who had selected the objects now holding them spellbound.
A gem-set dagger, pendant and flask
“I’ll miss it when it goes,” she admitted. “But I’m very, very pleased it’s been so successful and people have obviously enjoyed it. I quite liked eavesdropping on people who are talking to each other about the objects. I heard a couple who were looking at the jewelled jade pendant that arguably could have been made for Jahangir. The chap looked at it and said it was worth coming just to see that one piece. I thought that was fantastic.
“I am struck by the number of people who tell me they have been two, three, four, five, even 10 times. I have a Pakistani friend from Lahore, who is now in London, and he was coming every Friday and he was in week six.”
The Great Mughals was Stronge’s swansong after 49 years at the V&A. She formally retired in February as senior curator in the Asian department, where she had mentored many over the decades. Another of her exhibitions that she feels has left “a significant legacy” was The Art of the Sikh Kingdoms in 1999.
She said: “I have got a three-year position in the museum as an honorary senior research fellow in the research department of the V&A Research Institute.”
Although she is now recognised as a leading scholar in Sikh and Mughal art, she feels she came into the field almost by accident.
“A happy accident,” she acknowledged.
A model of the cenotaph of Mumtaz Mahal
She is a Yorkshire girl who grew up in Ripon in a family where visiting museums wasn’t the done thing. She initially did voluntary work in Norwich, at the Castle Museum and in Strangers’ Hall, a Grade I listed building. She didn’t know it then, but her life was set to change when she applied for, and got, a job as an assistant at the V&A in 1976.
“I was told at the interview I’d be in ceramics, metalwork or the press office,” she recalled. “When I turned up for work, the first day, they said, ‘Oh, you are in (what was then) the Indian section.’ This was a surprise, but also disconcerting, because I knew nothing about India, its history and culture. The keeper of the department was John Irwin, who was a very distinguished textile historian.
“I did an MA at SOAS in South Asia studies and was taught by John Burton-Page, who was a fantastic teacher of Mughal architecture and art. It snowballed from there as I got more and more interested. We did interesting exhibitions (at the V&A) under Robert Skelton’s leadership. We did Arts of Bengal in 1979. No two years were the same. We were given so many opportunities.”
Her interest in Mughal art “evolved over many years. I’ve been teaching a lot on South Asian art courses”.
She found the Western way of defining fine or decorative art “did not apply at all to Mughal or other Eastern arts. So, I started thinking about how to present it.
“I did a book many years ago (2010) called Made for Mughal Emperors: Royal Treasures from Hindustan which was published by Roli in India. I did it by theme, and took things like the institution of the royal household, the imperial treasury. It was much more rooted in telling the cultural story of the history and atmosphere of the court.”
She likes the word “Hindustan”, because the art of pre-Partition India takes in present-day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, and Myanmar. It was also what the Mughals called their own territories.
Coming to the present, she said that when the V&A’s current director, Tristram Hunt, “said he would like a South Asian exhibition, I suggested The Great Mughals, and it was added to the schedule – though plans were later disrupted by the pandemic.”
And, a floorspread
She began by considering the objects she could pick, and is grateful for the loans from the Al-Sabah collection in Kuwait. She said the late Sheikh Nasser “had an absolute passion for Mughal art”, and his wife, Sheikha Hussa, had been “incredibly generous”.
Stronge offered an insight into her approach to curating the exhibition: “I wanted to show the very great art produced over 100 years under Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jahan. I also wanted to explain something of the history and the cultural context, and also show how hybrid the culture was. That is reflected in the hybridity of the art.
“In the West you tend to see Hindu and Muslim in completely separate categories. That’s not the reality. People share in each other’s religious festivals. That’s why in the studies of art history, ‘Islamic art’ is an almost meaningless term.
“Art historians (in the West) can’t quite place the Mughal empire, because it is not purely Islamic. The rulers are Muslim, but the majority of the population was Hindu. Akbar had Hindu wives and Jahangir had a Hindu mother. It’s not something that fits into Western categorisation. It’s much more hybrid. That’s something I wanted to get across – and how remarkable the artists were. Most of us, certainly me, had never heard of them before I joined the V&A. People like Ustad Mansur, Abu’l-Hasan, and the Iranian master Sa’ida Gilani, a goldsmith who crafted jade artefacts. What is so frustrating is how little we know about their lives or backgrounds.
“The thing that surprises many people is the primacy of the Persian language in the Mughal courts. It was the cultural language of the court, whether you were Hindu or Muslim. One of the leading poets under Jahangir was a Brahmin writing in Persian. I wanted to show the internationalism of the court, the importance of the Persian language and the beauty of the objects. Then there are things, like enamelling, which is a difficult craft. It comes from a foreign technique but becomes completely Mughal and sensational.”
Some of the craft techniques had survived, passed down from one generation to the next.
“There’s this wonderful continuity,” she commented.
She said the Aga Khan Trust for Culture, for example, was trying to revive “the craft of inlaying wood with mother of pearl. They wanted to copy a canopy that had been made in Gujarat and moved to a shrine in Nizamuddin in Delhi. They wanted to put it in their new museum. And, in doing so, they revived a craft that had been completely lost.
“They had to reinvent it almost by trial and error, and they’ve done it to perfection. We showed a short film about the technique in the exhibition.”
Perhaps most important of all, what her exhibition shows is that the Mughals were and remain an integral part of India, its history and its culture.
“If you remove them (from India’s history), you’re removing some of the greatest monuments in the world from the narrative, aren’t you?” she pointed out.
“How do you explain the Taj Mahal, the forts in Delhi and Agra, the endless tombs and monuments? If you don’t know the historical context, you’re losing a lot. It’s something to be proud of.
“If you’ve got a country with a Taj Mahal, it’s something to celebrate.”
Keep ReadingShow less
Imola has been the stage for some of Formula One’s most unforgettable moments
The Autodromo Enzo e Dino Ferrari, nestled in the Italian countryside near Imola, has long been a proving ground for Formula One’s finest. While its history is shadowed by the tragic events of 1994, the circuit has also delivered some of the sport’s most electrifying moments, testing the limits of driver skill, strategy, and sheer willpower. Here’s a look back at three of the most memorable races at this demanding track.
2005: Alonso vs Schumacher – A Showdown of Generations
In 2005, Formula One fans were treated to a classic duel between a young Fernando Alonso and the legendary Michael Schumacher. Starting 13th on the grid, Schumacher charged through the field in a masterful display of overtaking to reach the tail of Alonso’s Renault in the closing stages.
The Ferrari had superior pace after a late fuel stop, but Alonso, just 23 at the time, executed a defensive masterclass, denying the seven-time champion every opportunity to pass. Schumacher probed for weaknesses at the Tosa hairpin, the Variante Alta chicane, and even down the hill into Acque Minerali, but Alonso held his line each time, his car perfectly placed to block every attack. After 20 minutes of relentless pressure, Alonso crossed the line just 0.2 seconds ahead, securing his third consecutive win of the season. This race became a defining moment in the Spaniard’s career, cementing his reputation as a champion in the making. It also marked a symbolic end to Ferrari’s dominant era, as Schumacher would win just one more race that season, while Alonso went on to claim his first world title.
1985: A Race of Chaos and Fuel Misfortune
The 1985 San Marino Grand Prix was one of the strangest in F1 history, defined by fuel shortages and last-lap heartbreak. Ayrton Senna, who had secured pole in his Lotus, appeared set for victory until his fuel tank ran dry just four laps from the end. With Senna out, Stefan Johansson briefly took the lead in his Ferrari, only for an electrical fault to mislead his fuel gauge, forcing him to retire a lap later. This handed the lead to Alain Prost, who managed to coax his McLaren over the finish line, only to be disqualified when his car was found to be 2kg underweight. Amid this chaos, Elio de Angelis, Senna’s Lotus teammate, found himself declared the unlikely winner – the only time he crossed the line first without leading a single lap. It was to be the Italian’s final victory, as he tragically lost his life in a testing accident the following year. Adding to the farce, Thierry Boutsen ran out of fuel just metres from the finish, pushing his Arrows across the line to secure second place.
2021: Hamilton’s Remarkable Comeback
The 2021 Emilia Romagna Grand Prix was another chapter of high drama, this time defined by changing weather and a relentless recovery drive from Lewis Hamilton. Starting from pole, Hamilton was forced wide by Max Verstappen at the first corner, damaging his front wing and dropping him to second. The race then took another turn when Hamilton slid off into the gravel while attempting to lap George Russell, seemingly ending his chances of a strong finish. However, a red flag triggered by a high-speed crash between Russell and Valtteri Bottas allowed Hamilton to rejoin the race, now in ninth place. From there, he carved his way through the field to finish second, earning high praise from Mercedes boss Toto Wolff, who called it a “10 out of 10” performance.
From nerve-wracking defensive drives to chaotic fuel dramas and stunning comeback charges, Imola has been the stage for some of Formula One’s most unforgettable moments. Despite its tragic past, the circuit remains a cherished battleground, pushing drivers to the absolute limit.
Keep ReadingShow less
Trump referred to India as 'one of the highest tariff nations in the world.' (Photo: Getty Images)
US president Donald Trump has again said that India is ready to cut 100 per cent tariffs on American goods and that a trade deal between the two countries is expected soon.
Speaking to Fox News, Trump said he is not in a "rush" to finalise the deal.
Commenting on Trump's remarks, India's external affairs minister S Jaishankar said in New Delhi on Thursday that any trade deal between the two countries must be mutually beneficial.
Trump referred to India as "one of the highest tariff nations in the world."
"They make it almost impossible to do business. Do you know that they're willing to cut 100 per cent of their tariffs for the United States?" he said.
When asked if the deal is coming soon, Trump said, "That'll come soon. I'm in no rush. Look, everybody wants to make a deal with us."
He added, "South Korea wants to make a deal but I'm not going to make deals with everybody. I'm just going to set the limit. I'll make another some deals. Because I can't, you can't meet with that many people. I've got 150 countries that want to make deals."
Talks are currently ongoing between India and the US to finalise a trade agreement.
On Thursday, Jaishankar said that negotiations were underway.
"These are complicated negotiations. Nothing is decided till everything is. Any trade deal has to be mutually beneficial; it has to work for both countries," he said. "That would be our expectation from the trade deal."
India's commerce minister Piyush Goyal is in Washington to assess the progress of the proposed trade agreement.
He is expected to meet US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative (USTR) Jamieson Greer.
India is looking for duty concessions on labour-intensive sectors including textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, garments, plastics, chemicals, shrimp, oil seeds, chemicals, grapes, and bananas.
The US is seeking duty concessions in areas such as industrial goods, automobiles (especially electric vehicles), wines, petrochemical products, dairy, and agricultural items like apples and tree nuts.
(With inputs from PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
Nancy Tyagi stuns in a handmade silver-aqua gown at Cannes 2025
Nancy Tyagi is back at Cannes. But this time, the 24 year old influencer and designer from Uttar Pradesh is not just a surprise guest, she is a name many were waiting to see again.
Last year, she made her debut at the prestigious festival in a self stitched 44 lb (20 kg) ruffled pink gown, crafted from scratch in her Delhi home. It was not just the weight of the dress that turned heads but the story behind it. A year later, Nancy returned with another outfit of her own making.
This time, she wore a silver aqua gown with a plunging neckline, a shimmering corset, and layers of tulle. It had roses stitched into the skirt and headpiece, and bold shoulders that looked like unfolding petals. Her makeup was clean and glam with silver smoky eyes, a neatly tied bun, and just the right sparkle.
What is special is not just the gown, but the fabric. She sourced it from Seelampur, a market in northeast Delhi better known for its chaos than couture. But that is what makes Nancy different. She turns everyday materials into red carpet magic. She does not come from fashion schools or big labels. She learnt it all by herself.
The self-taught designer walks the red carpet in a look stitched from Seelampur fabricInstagram/nancytyagi
Nancy said she felt emotional returning to Cannes, where everything changed for her. “Last year, I was overwhelmed. This year, I feel proud,” she said. “This is my outfit. I made it. It is all mine.”
Her Instagram post summed it up in Hindi: “Phir se Cannes… phir se red carpet. Kabhi socha nahi tha yeh safar itna khoobsurat hoga” (Back to Cannes, back to the red carpet. I never imagined this journey would be so beautiful).
Nancy Tyagi brings local craftsmanship to the global stage in her second Cannes appearanceInstagram/nancytyagi
And the internet agreed. From fashion fans to fellow creators, the applause was loud. Comments flooded in praising her evolution, confidence, and creativity. One user wrote, “You have inspired millions. This is real talent: self made, rooted, and unstoppable.”
Nancy’s journey from a small town girl stitching clothes in her room to walking the world’s most watched red carpet continues to be proof that success does not need privilege. Just skill, grit, and imagination.