Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Hanging of 2012 rapists stirs women’s safety debate in India

By Amit Roy

AT 5.30AM (12am GMT) last Friday (20), four men – Mukesh Kumar Singh, 32; Akshay Kumar Singh, 30; Vinay Sharma, 26; and Pawan Gupta, 25 – were “hanged simulta­neously” in Tihar Jail in Delhi.


They were put to death for the gang rape on December 16, 2012, of a 23-year-old medical student who died of her extensive injuries a fort­night later in a Singapore hospital.

Afterwards, the bodies were kept hanging for half an hour as stipu­lated by the jail manual. Before go­ing to the gallows, Vinay and Muke­sh “had roti, dal, rice and sabzi for dinner and Akshay only tea in the evening”, an official revealed.

India hasn’t abolished the death penalty, but it is imposed only in the “rarest of rare” cases. This was con­sidered one, given the horrific way in which five men and a 17-year-old – the latter was released after three years while Ram Singh, 34, appar­ently committed suicide in prison – took it in turn to brutalise their vic­tim inside a moving bus before tossing out her bruised body along with her beaten male friend.

The victim was given the pseudo­nym Nirbhaya – “the fearless one”.

One commentator, Namita Bhandare, argued: “Indian law does not permit the naming of rape victims. Presumably this is because the crime of rape is so terrible that, in society’s eyes, it stains not the rapist, but his victim with shame; a shame so indelible that her honour and that of her family is irretrievably lost.

“The hangman’s noose was, de­spite the delays, an inevitable desti­nation for the four convicts. The question to ask now is what really changes for India’s women? That answer is depressingly brief. Noth­ing. But for now, to honour the one who died, we could begin by re­claiming her identity and calling her by her name.”

Surely, she has a point.

The BBC’s Gita Pandey pondered: “Has India become safer for women? A short answer to that question would be: No. And that’s because despite the increased scru­tiny of crimes against women since December 2012, similar violent in­cidents have continued to make headlines in India. And statistics tell only a part of the story – cam­paigners say thousands of rapes and cases of sexual assault are not even reported to the police.”

Punishment for sex crimes has been toughened in India, but ap­pear to have done nothing to re­duce attacks against women. Quite the reverse, in fact. The National Crime Records Bureau reports that 378,000 cases of crimes against women were recorded across India in 2018 compared to 359,000 in 2017 and 338,000 in 2016. Rape in 2018 totalled 33,356.

The executions were condemned by Amnesty International India as a “dark stain” on India’s human rights record, but were otherwise widely welcomed. The victim’s mother, Asha Devi, said: “Justice was de­layed but has been delivered finally. I hugged the photo of my daughter and said, ‘Today you got justice.’”

Prime minister Narendra Modi tweeted: “Justice has prevailed. It is of utmost importance to ensure dignity and safety of women.”

There were approving responses from many Bollywood personali­ties. For example, Preity Zinta said: “I wish it would have been faster but I’m happy it’s over. If Nirbhaya rapists were hung in 2012, the judi­cial system would have stopped so much crime against women. Fear of the law would have kept the lawless in check. Prevention is always bet­ter than cure.”

In Britain, the home secretary Priti Patel has been taken to task for remarks she made on the BBC’s Question Time in 2011, but in India, no one would have quibbled.

Patel had said: “I do actually think when we have a criminal jus­tice system that continuously fails in this country, and where we have seen murderers, rapists and people who have committed the most ab­horrent crimes in society, go into prison and then are released from prison to go out into the communi­ty to then re-offend and do the types of crime they have committed again and again. I think that’s ap­palling. And actually on that basis alone, I would actually support the reintroduction of capital punish­ment to serve as a deterrent.”

Recently, she insisted: “I have never said I’m an active supporter of it and (what I said) is constantly taken out of context.”

India is different. As soon as the jail authorities confirmed the hang­ings, many in the crowd outside began clapping and chanting Van­de mataram and Bharat Mata ki jai.

Although the death penalty was abolished in the UK in 1969, multi­ple or fatal gang rapes in this coun­try are relatively rare. They remain far too common in India, with no solution in sight.

More For You

Baffling cabinet reshuffle

Piyush Goyal with Jonathan Reynolds at Chequers during the signing of the UK–India Free Trade Agreement in July

Baffling cabinet reshuffle

IN SIR KEIR STARMER’S cabinet reshuffle last week, triggered by the resignation of Angela Rayner, the prime minister shifted Jonathan Reynolds from business and trade secretary and president of the board of trade after barely a year in the post to chief whip, making him responsible for the party.

The move doesn’t make much sense. At Chequers, the UK-India Free Trade Agreement was signed by Reynolds, and the Indian commerce and industry minister, Piyush Goyal. They had clearly established a friendly working relationship.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

We are living faster than ever before

AMG

​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

Shiveena Haque

Finding romance today feels like trying to align stars in a night sky that refuses to stay still

When was the last time you stumbled into a conversation that made your heart skip? Or exchanged a sweet beginning to a love story - organically, without the buffer of screens, swipes, or curated profiles? In 2025, those moments feel rarer, swallowed up by the quickening pace of life.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

Shabana Mahmood, US homeland security secretary Kristi Noem, Canada’s public safety minister Gary Anandasangaree, Australia’s home affairs minister Tony Burke and New Zealand’s attorney general Judith Collins at the Five Eyes security alliance summit on Monday (8)

Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer’s government is not working. That is the public verdict, one year in. So, he used his deputy Angela Rayner’s resignation to hit the reset button.

It signals a shift in his own theory of change. Starmer wanted his mission-led government to avoid frequent shuffles of his pack, so that ministers knew their briefs. Such a dramatic reshuffle shows that the prime minister has had enough of subject expertise for now, gambling instead that fresh eyes may bring bold new energy to intractable challenges on welfare and asylum.

Keep ReadingShow less
indian-soldiers-ww1-getty
Indian infantrymen on the march in France in October 1914 during World War I. (Photo: Getty Images)
Getty Images

Comment: We must not let anti-immigration anger erase south Asian soldiers who helped save Britain

This country should never forget what we all owe to those who won the second world war against fascism. So the 80th anniversary of VE Day and VJ Day this year have had a special poignancy in bringing to life how the historic events that most of us know from grainy black and white photographs or newsreel footage are still living memories for a dwindling few.

People do sometimes wonder if the meaning of these great historic events will fade in an increasingly diverse Britain. If we knew our history better, we would understand why that should not be the case.

For the armies that fought and won both world wars look more like the Britain of 2025 in their ethnic and faith mix than the Britain of 1945 or 1918. The South Asian soldiers were the largest volunteer army in history, yet ensuring that their enormous contribution is fully recognised in our national story remains an important work in progress.

Keep ReadingShow less
Spotting the signs of dementia

Priya Mulji with her father

Spotting the signs of dementia

How noticing the changes in my father taught me the importance of early action, patience, and love

I don’t understand people who don’t talk or see their parents often. Unless they have done something to ruin your lives or you had a traumatic childhood, there is no reason you shouldn’t be checking in with them at least every few days if you don’t live with them.

Keep ReadingShow less