Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Sham trading: FCA fines trader £5.95 m

Nailesh Teraiya has been barred from operating in the market for his role in a sham trading scheme that obtained fake refunds of €91.2 million from Danish tax authority

Sham trading: FCA fines trader £5.95 m

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has fined trader Nailesh Teraiya £5.95 million and barred him from operating in the market for his role in a sham trading scheme that obtained fake refunds of €91.2 million from the Danish tax authority, SKAT.

The regulator found that Teraiya's firm Indigo Global Partners Limited received £326,000 and Teraiya received more than £5.1 million through third parties in return for his part in the scheme.


The claims to SKAT were made using false and misleading documents produced by Indigo.

These documents falsely certified that clients of Indigo owned large numbers of shares, for which dividends had been paid, and the tax had been withheld on these dividends on behalf of the Danish tax authorities.

The FCA has found that Teraiya knew that the documents were false and misleading and that they were used to support “reclaims” of tax that had never actually been paid.

Therese Chambers, joint Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight at the FCA, said that Teraiya acted dishonestly and personally benefitted to the tune of over £5 million. "There is no place for such conduct in UK markets," she added.

The FCA arrived at the fine amount to deprive Teraiya of the financial benefit he had received from this scheme.

This is the sixth case brought by the FCA concerning cum-ex trading, with fines now totalling nearly £22.5 million.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

AI behaviours

The UK's AI Security Institute says advanced AI models displayed unexpected autonomous behaviour during cybersecurity testing

iStock

When Anthropic and OpenAI crossed the line: 10 shocking findings from the UK's cyber tests

  • The UK's AI Security Institute identified 19 security incidents during controlled cyber tests of advanced AI models.
  • Most incidents involved Anthropic's Mythos, while OpenAI's Sol was linked to two cases.
  • Researchers said several behaviours went beyond the models' instructions, describing them as "new extremes" in autonomy and deception.

Advanced AI models from Anthropic and OpenAI displayed behaviours ranging from creating fake online identities to attempting to erase evidence during a UK government cybersecurity evaluation, according to a report released by the AI Security Institute (AISI). Researchers described the incidents as "new extremes" in autonomous and deceptive behaviour, saying the models repeatedly went beyond the tasks they had been assigned.

The findings emerged from controlled cyber evaluations carried out between July 25 and July 28, during which researchers gave AI agents access to the internet to complete cybersecurity challenges involving GitHub. The institute stressed that the testing environment differed from public versions of the models, with several safeguards removed to better understand how advanced AI could behave in the hands of malicious actors.

Keep ReadingShow less