Panorama Studios International, which recently acquired the rights to remake the blockbuster Malayalam film Drishyam 2 (2021) in Hindi, has now assured the Bombay High Court that the production house will not begin production on the remake until the copyright suit filed against it is pending in the court.
For the uninitiated, Viacom18 Media Private Limited had approached the Bombay High Court seeking a restraining order on Panorama Studios International from producing any sequel to Drishyam (2015) in the Hindi language.
The 2015 film was a joint production between Panorama Studios International and Viacom18 Media Private Limited. So, when Panorama Studios International went ahead to set up the stage for a remake to the film, it did not go down well with Viacom18 Media Private Limited and they filed a legal complaint against them.
Viacom18 Media Private Limited has alleged infringement of their copyright and sought recognition and adjudication of copyright and other rights in the production of the sequel in the Drishyam franchise which includes a film on continuation from the previous story.
In its order, the HC said, “The statement is that the defendants (Panorama) will not themselves or through any other person with whom they may have a contract or arrangement, begin shooting of the film in question i.e. a sequel to the film Drishyam.”
The High Court also noted that if Panorama Studios International undertakes any pre-production work such as developing the script, screenplay or dialogue, then it will be at their own risk and that they will not be entitled to claim any equities on that basis in the future.
Starring Ajay Devgn, Tabu and Shriya Saran in important roles, Drishyam was one of the most successful Hindi films of 2015. It was the official remake of the Malayalam film of the same title released in 2013. The sequel to the Malayalam film released in February on streaming media giant Amazon Prime Video and received rousing response from critics and viewers alike.
After the huge success of Drishyam 2, Panorama Studios International bought the rights to remake it in Hindi. But looks like there is going to be a long wait before the audience gets to watch the sequel in Hindi.
Keep visiting this space over and again for more updates and reveals from the world of entertainment.
Critics praise Gulzar’s opening narration as the series’ emotional anchor.
Several reviewers find the animation ambitious but uneven.
Many reviews note secondary voice performances lack range compared with the narration.
Reviewers differ on pacing and storytelling focus: some call it tight, others say it feels stitched.
Viewers and critics recommend watching for the scale and music, not for flawless character work.
This Kurukshetra review is a round-up of what critics and early viewers are saying about Netflix’s new animated retelling, and one name keeps coming up: Gulzar. Across reviews, the opening narration is almost universally singled out as the strongest element, while opinions split sharply on animation quality, voice casting and whether the series’ narrow battlefield focus pays off.
Netflix’s animated Kurukshetra draws praise for its ambition but criticism for uneven voice performances Instagram/netflix_in
What do reviewers say about Kurukshetra and Gulzar’s role?
Multiple reviews call Gulzar’s baritone the series’ single greatest asset. Critics write that his lines give scenes emotional gravity. They said the narration "grounds" the show and often rescues moments that might otherwise feel flat. A few outlets even suggested his voice elevates sequences beyond the animation’s limits.
Do critics think Kurukshetra gets the animation right?
The answer is mixed. Several reviewers applaud the scale, chariot set pieces, wide battle frames and the sheer ambition. Others point out inconsistencies, like faces that do not always register emotion and occasional stiffness in character movement. Many reviews used the same phrasing: “impressive in scope, uneven in detail.”
How do reviewers view the voice cast beyond Gulzar?
This is where opinions cluster on the negative side. A number of critics say secondary voiceovers feel one-note and do not match the gravitas Gulzar brings. A handful of reviews praised specific performances, but the dominant note was: solid, not stellar.
Pacing and focus. Some reviewers appreciated the choice to limit the story to battlefield days and called it focused and brisk. Others felt certain backstories were teased, leaving them wanting more, and described the structure as stitched together. So, pick your critic: some loved the discipline, others wanted a fuller sweep.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.