Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

UK’s Border Force approach ineffective in tackling illegal Channel crossings: review

‘Border Force seems to be less than the sum of its parts with significant systemic challenges'

UK’s Border Force approach ineffective in tackling illegal Channel crossings: review

The UK’s Border Force has been “ineffective” in tackling illegal Channel crossings by migrants, with the agency’s attention diverted away from the smuggling of drugs and firearms, an independent review said.

The Border Force maritime command, comprising 230 staff and 30 vessels, has been drawn into a challenge that it is ill-equipped to deal with, the review led by former Australian immigration minister Alexander Downer found.

It said despite examples of excellence and a dedicated workforce, the Border Force seems to be less than the sum of its parts with significant systemic challenges.

“To sustain the Border Force operation . . . officers from elsewhere are being drafted into the maritime command, which detracts from other important activities,” the review commissioned by home secretary Priti Patel said.

According to it, Border Force maritime should not be providing an ongoing search and rescue function in the English Channel as its vessels are not appropriate for the task.

“Vessels that are better suited to the task should be contracted for and placed under the command and control of either the Coast Guard or Royal Navy so that Border Force are not used as the primary resource for such operations,” the review said.

It also recommended that turnaround tactics should be available to deter migrants from crossing the channel.

“Taking any given tactic off the table is unhelpful where one of the desired outcomes is a deterrent effect. All legal and operationally feasible options should be on the table. The government should maintain the option of turnaround tactics when it is safe and legal to do so. Contracted vessels and specialist crews may be more effective in conducting these challenging operations.”

Significantly, Downer said people who illegally entered the UK should be moved “to a third country rapidly” for assessment under the UN Convention and other relevant legislation.

“The rapid movement of people that have entered the UK illegally to a third country reduces the risk of the removal process being frustrated. The eligibility for removal should embrace all cohorts of people who enter the UK illegally,” he said.

Citing Australia’s experience, he said the pace at which people are moved, along with avoiding a running commentary on numbers, is useful in achieving success.

“The discussion of numbers at various stages of operational implementation will potentially look like the odds are still in favour of attempting dangerous, illegal migration journeys and the deterrent effect is lost”, he said.

Diplomatic efforts to resolve this problem jointly with France would be a significant contribution to a sustainable solution, the report said.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Online gambling
India’s Gambling Evolution: From Casino Excitement to Online Gaming Growth
iStock

Online gamblers spending £1,000 a day to face new UK checks

  • Gamblers spending more than £1,000 in 24 hours could face financial risk assessments.
  • Regulator says the checks are not affordability tests and will not affect credit scores.
  • Betting industry warns the changes could push customers towards illegal gambling sites.

Online gambling customers in the UK who spend large sums in a short period could soon face financial risk assessments, under new rules announced by the Gambling Commission. The regulator says the changes are aimed at identifying customers who may be experiencing financial hardship, while the betting industry argues they could drive gamblers towards unregulated operators.

Under the new framework, customers spending more than £1,000 within a 24-hour period or £3,000 over a rolling 90-day period will be eligible for enhanced financial risk assessments. Lower thresholds will apply to gamblers aged under 25, with checks beginning at £750 in 24 hours once the system is fully introduced.

Keep ReadingShow less