Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Twitter erupts over India's deportation of Debbie Abrahams

THE Indian High Commission in London has clarified that immigration officials in Delhi had deported British MP Debbie Abrahams because she “did not hold a valid visa”, and that there was “no provision for visa on arrival for UK nationals”.

The clarification came amid a controversy over India’s denial of entry on Sunday (16) to the Labour lawmaker, who had been critical of the Modi government scrapping special status to the Jammu and Kashmir region.


Abrahams, chair of Britain’s All Party Parliamentary Group on Kashmir, was travelling with an e-visa, which that had reportedly been revoked on Friday (14) for “activities which went against India's national interests”.

In an earlier tweet, she had wondered “why was it [visa] revoked & when?”, and called the developments “very disappointing”.

Meanwhile, what caught the attention of many observers in India was one of her tweets on the issue, in which she asked: “Why didn't they let me get a 'visa on arrival'?”

Soon, social media hawks started accusing Abrahams of behaving under “colonial hangover”.

“After 14th August 1947, entering into India ceased being a ‘right’ for the Brits,” wrote Indian Defence Forum editor Yusuf Unjhawala.

Indian MP Rajeev Chandrasekar, too, commented on the denial of entry episode, and offered a word of advice for Abrahams and travellers in general.

Senior Congress leader and Supreme Court lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi backed the Indian government’s decision to deport Abrahams. He went on to accuse her of being a “Pak proxy”.

Pakistani President also took to Twitter for a potshot at India. In an apparent reference to Kashmir, he said, "The world will find out despite India's attempt to hide its atrocities."

The UK Foreign Office, meanwhile, said she had been offered consular assistance and were in contact with Indian authorities to evaluate the incident.

Abrahams had issued a letter raising concerns over the Indian government’s decision to scrap special status conferred upon J&K region in August last year.

“We are gravely concerned at the announcement by Indian Home Minister, Amit Shah, that Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which grants special status to Jammu and Kashmir, has been removed by Presidential Order," said the letter to UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Migrants pay 60% more into NHS than their healthcare costs, analysis finds

The Immigration Health Surcharge is a fee that most people applying for eligible UK visas must pay as part of their immigration application. It is intended to contribute towards the cost of healthcare during their stay in the country.

Migrants pay 60% more into NHS than their healthcare costs, analysis finds

Highlights:

  • Migrants paying the IHS contributed at least 60% more to NHS finances than their estimated healthcare costs in 2023/24, including standard tax contributions.
  • The annual surcharge has risen from £200 to £1,035 for most visa applicants.
  • IHS revenue peaked at almost £2.5 billion in 2024/25.
  • The surcharge now accounts for more than 1 per cent of the NHS budget.
  • Revenue fell to £2.3 billion in 2025/26 as immigration numbers declined.
  • Around one-fifth of the NHS workforce comes from overseas, according to the Nuffield Trust fellow quoted in the report.

  • Migrants who pay to live and work in the UK are contributing substantially more to NHS finances than the estimated cost of the healthcare they receive, according to new analysis by the Nuffield Trust. The findings have reignited debate over immigration, healthcare funding and the purpose of the Immigration Health Surcharge (IHS).

    Keep ReadingShow less