Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

Stars under the scanner for fake follower fraud

HOW BOGUS SOCIAL MEDIA BOOSTS HAVE BECOME BIG BUSINESS

by ASJAD NAZIR


THE legal authorities in India have finally caught up with what I pointed out in this newspaper column some years ago and are now investigating celebrities who have been paying for fake social media followers.

It has been reported that Indian police would question A-list Bollywood stars Deepika Padukone and Priyanka Chopra, who both have over 50 million Instagram followers each, in connection with the case.

According to initial reports, over 170 high-profile people in India including stars in film, music and sports have paid to get fake social media followers, along with manufactured likes’ on posts. Providing a fake social media boost to high-profile personalities has become such a big business in India that as many as 54 firms are reportedly involved in what has been described as a huge racket. Authorities in India are taking this so seriously that a special task force has been formed to investigate it.

These findings are not surprising because when I had teamed up with auditing websites to investigate Bollywood stars in particular, I had shockingly found that all frontline stars had less than 60 per cent genuine followers and some had as little as five to 10 per cent.

The biggest offenders on Twitter seemed to be Bollywood mega-stars Shah Rukh Khan and Amitabh Bachchan, who both show over 40 million Twitter followers each, but have significantly fewer. But they are not alone because pretty much every major Bollywood star has falsely boosted their following count on the micro-blogging site.

A great way to spot who the worst offenders on Twitter are is by seeing how little engagement they get on tweets in relation to the millions of followers each of them claim to have. Although Instagram had stepped up security to weed out fake followers, paid outside companies have found a way to boost follower numbers and likes.

Outsiders looking into this scandal may think it’s harmless and not worth investigating because everyone embellishes a little online, but there are far reaching consequences to fraudulent activity on social media by frontline stars and ‘influencers’ connected to fake followers.

Many of them get lucrative brand endorsements based on how many followers they have on social media and are often paid big money to put up posts. But if their follower count is fake then the company paying for social media advertising or getting a star to front a brand is getting badly cheated. It would be like paying to have your product advertised in a stadium full of people, but later discovering that most of those present were cardboard cut-outs. It has been reported that fake follower fraud will cost companies over one billion pounds this year.

Potential producers new to the film industry can also get duped and finance projects they think have popular stars based on fake follower counts. That is obviously apparent with some so-called popular stars that claim to have millions of followers and generate very little interest in terms of engagement.

Earlier this year when Parineeti Chopra and Arjun Kapoor, who claim to have nearly 20 million followers on Twitter, shared a trailer for their movie Sandeep Aur Pinky Faraar there was shockingly little interest. I demonstrated this by tweeting a photo of samosas, which got more retweets than posts promoting their film.

Another damaging aspect of fake followers not being spoken about is the mental damage it does on young people presented by impossible heights of popularity that don’t actually exist.

Big names in Bollywood are by far the worst offenders in India because South Indian cinema stars and TV personalities have largely stuck to having mostly genuine followers.

Some overly competitive fan groups are also contributing to the fake follower fraud by paying to have their favourite get a false boost to beat a rival star.

The Indian stars under investigation are unlikely to face criminal charges because it will be difficult to prove they paid for fake followers, but what this whole episode will do if publicised properly is show what you see on social media is largely not real and investors should keep alert.

Finally, fake follower fraud isn’t the only dishonesty exhibited by major stars in India on social media. It has been made a requirement that celebrities doing paid posts have to let followers know and in many countries it’s a law, but Indian celebrities will largely dupe followers by making them think their posts are real opinions. That is the next thing authorities in India need to clamp down on.

More For You

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn

Getty Images

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

It is a truth universally acknowledged that voters are dissatisfied with the political choices on offer - so must they be in want of new parties too? A proliferation of start-ups showed how tricky political match-making can be. Zarah Sultana took Jeremy Corbyn by surprise by announcing they will co-lead a new left party. Two of Nigel Farage’s exes announced separate political initiatives to challenge Reform from its right, with the leader of London’s Conservatives lending her voice to Rupert Lowe’s revival of the politics of repatriation.

Corbyn and Sultana are from different generations. He had been an MP for a decade by the time she was born. For Sultana’s allies, this intergenerational element is a core case for the joint leadership. But the communications clash suggests friction ahead. After his allies could not persuade Sultana to retract her announcement, Corbyn welcomed her decision to leave Labour, saying ‘negotiations continue’ over the structure and leadership of a new party. It will seek to link MPs elected as pro-Gaza independents with other strands of the left outside Labour.

Keep ReadingShow less
Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

Amol Rajan at Prayagraj

Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

ONE reason I watched the BBC documentary Amol Rajan Goes to the Ganges with particular interest was because I have been wondering what to do with the ashes of my uncle, who died in August last year. His funeral, like that of his wife, was half Christian and half Hindu, as he had wished. But he left no instructions about his ashes.

Sooner or later, this is a question that every Hindu family in the UK will have to face, since it has been more than half a century since the first generation of Indian immigrants began arriving in this country. Amol admits he found it difficult to cope with the loss of his father, who died aged 76 three years ago. His ashes were scattered in the Thames.

Keep ReadingShow less
One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less