RISING STAR DUGAL ON HER GLITTERING CAREER, SUCCESSFUL PROJECTS AND FUTURE HOPES
by MOHNISH SINGH
A STEADY run of strong performances has turned into a full-blown
sprint for rapidly rising Indian star Rasika Dugal in the past few years.
The talented actress has shown off her impressive versatility in films, high-profile TV dramas and winning web serials. Some of her superb recent successes include perfect performances in popular projects that include A Suitable Boy, Delhi Crime, Mirzapur and Lootcase. She recently returned for Mirzapur 2 on Amazon Prime and her series A Suitable Boy has been made available on Netflix in countries around the world.
Eastern Eye caught up with in-demand actress Rasika to discuss her action-packed career, director Mira Nair, how she manages to keep reinventing herself to avoid monotony, and more.
How would you describe your show A Suitable Boy?
I don’t know whether or not you have read the book, but it follows three families in post-partitioned India in early 1950s. Basically, the story is about the Mehras where Rupa Mehra (Mahira Kakkar) is trying to look for a bridegroom for Lata (Tanya Maniktala). This young girl Lata is trying to find her way about the world and how she feels about it. It is basically about Lata and her journey exploring the world and her coming into her own while India as a country is also trying to come into her own. Any story which has a female protagonist is always interesting to tell.
What do you think is the biggest achievement of the show?
As you know, it is based on Vikram Seth’s classic novel, which is almost a 1,500 pages long book. I think creator Mira Nair and screenplay writer Andrew Davies had this monumental task of trying to set a 1,500 pages long novel like A Suitable Boy into a six-part series. That is the biggest achievement of the show, I think, because I am sure that must have been very hard. I believe in any creative process the hardest thing to do is edit. Every time I find editors and directors having to edit their work, my heart goes out to them. So, I am sure it was very difficult for Mira as it was for Andrew Davies. I feel they did a phenomenal job.
How did you manage to land a role in A Suitable Boy?
The casting for the project was done by Nandini Shrikent and Karan Wahi. I have known them for several years. I have auditioned with them several times and have even done a few projects with them.
How do you recall your first meeting with director Mira Nair?
I had met Mira a few times before and always had a deep desire to work with her. I first met Mira in New York when she introduced my film Qissa (2013) at the South Asian Indian Film Festival in New York. Tillotama Shome, my co-actor in Qissa, had acted in one film of Mira’s. So, she invited her to introduce our film to the audience. I had heard so much about her and was such a fan of her work. When I met her at the South Asian Indian Film Festival, she was so instantly friendly and loveable that my desire to work with her grew even stronger. It was one of the things on my bucket-list. I didn’t know if it would happen at all in my career. Fortunately, it did.
How has it been to work under the direction of Mira Nair?
It superseded my expectations in every way. I totally enjoyed being part of A Suitable Boy and being Savita. I also had a lot of fun with the ensemble cast. I had such good experience working with such great actors. It was great working with people who come to their work with a lot of commitment. Besides working with Mira and watching her work, I enjoyed watching her deal with an ensemble cast, which is her strength, I feel. I also enjoyed hanging out with her. Listening to her and her life experiences was great.
Tell us more about that…
She is such a great storyteller even when she is not directing for the camera. It’s very entertaining and engaging to listen to her recount a story from her life. She spoke about so many things like growing up in Bhubaneshwar – we had a similarity because I also grew up in a small-town, Jamshedpur – to her experience working with Hollywood actors, and scuba diving to motherhood. There was so much to talk about. (Laughs) I think I can talk with Mira endlessly.
What was that specific moment during the narration where you decided you were doing the show?
I decided before the narration I was going to be part of the show. There were no two ways about it (laughs). I was not going to miss out on an opportunity to work with Mira Nair. Because of the body of work she has, I was sure that anything that she makes will be beautiful. I, actually, said yes to the project without even reading the script. But, of course, I had read the novel. Vikram Seth is one of my favourite writers. I was like, “I am on with you guys.”
Do any of your characters live with you beyond the project?
Earlier, I used to shy away from this question a lot. I was very afraid of romanticising my work. I think, for any actor, that is a very scary zone to get into. I have been very wary of acknowledging this, but with the kind of work I have done, it does affect you in ways you might not understand. And in ways that you might not be able to articulate because the experience is very visceral. So, it is hard to say how much and what exactly you take back from something, how it affects you or whether or not you get over it and forget. Or whether that becomes a part of your memory and lived experience.
So it stays with you…
It’s difficult to say because it’s not quantifiable, but definitely, it stays with you and that’s why we do what we do, because we want it to affect us in a particular way. I want something I am working on to be an experience rather than being just yet another day at work.
When you look at your diverse projects, starting with Anwar, then through to Qissa, Manto and a web series like Delhi Crime, is your career anything like you dreamed or hoped that it would be?
It’s more than what I had imagined for myself because, I think, in terms of the quality of work I have done, I have been more than fortunate, especially to get an opportunity to work on projects like Qissa, Manto, Delhi Crime and A Suitable Boy, and people I had an opportunity to collaborate with – whether it was Nandita Das, Mira Nair, Richie Mehta, Anup Singh and co-actors. I mean I have worked with some of the best actors that our country has.
Tell us about that?
Getting an opportunity to work with Irrfan Khan, Nawaz (Nawazuddin Siddiqui), Pankaj Tripathi, Tisca Chopra, Shefali Shah and Tillotama Shome; I mean what else could I have asked for?
So, in terms of quality of work and people I had an opportunity to collaborate with, I think it is more than what I had imagined for myself. I keep telling Anup and Nandita that you guys have spoilt me because now my expectations from any project, any director or anybody I collaborate with is of a very high standard. The only grief was that the films that I have been part of have not had the opportunity to reach a very wide audience, especially Qissa. It was such a beautiful piece of work with Irrfan. It could have been released better. It could have been marketed better. Then it would have reached the audience I felt it deserved. But I think with the coming of streaming platforms and shows like Mirzapur and Delhi Crime, even that has been satisfying.
Was there a moment you considered a turning point for you?
Different ones for different reasons. I think Qissa was really a turning point for me in terms of confidence and possibilities as a performer. That experience opened a new world, for me which I am very grateful to Irrfan, Tillotama, Tisca and Anup for. I think that was really a project in which I understood that there can be magic in performances. Mirzapur and Chutney, a short film I have done, were turning points for me in terms of reaching to a wider audience. My work being appreciated and watched by so many people is a great feeling.
How do you keep reinventing yourself to avoid monotony?
It’s not so conscious. I don’t have a strategy on what I am choosing at any particular point. What I want to do next changes pretty often. I mean if you interview me next week, I might say something else (laughs). It’s really about how you are feeling in that moment as a person or performer. Sometimes things aligned themselves for a project. For every project I sign, I always have a slight trepidation because I think I am prone to being sceptical about things.
Why is that?
While I am very excited, there is a part of me which manages to exercise a healthy degree of scepticism. So, I don’t really know what criteria I have; it keeps changing. Sometimes it’s about the length of the role, or how a certain character is placed within the story. Is that something different from what I have done before? Sometimes, it is also about comfort. For example, I felt that playing Savita in A Suitable Boy was very comfortable for me. It’s set in an era I am comfortable with. At one point, I really wanted to do a part which was driving the narrative, something which happened with Out Of Love. If you ask me one thing that I am really keen to explore is being part of a biopic. I was in Manto, but I didn’t play Manto in the biopic.
HBO’s upcoming Harry Potter reboot is already under fire, this time for casting Italian actress Alessia Leoni as Parvati Patil, a character rooted in Indian culture. The announcement has triggered widespread backlash from fans who accuse the makers of side-lining authentic South Asian representation in favour of what many see as surface-level diversity.
Parvati, originally portrayed by Shefali Chowdhury in the films, is one of the few explicitly Indian characters in the Harry Potter universe. The decision to cast someone with no clear Indian heritage has led to heated discussions across platforms like Reddit and X, with fans calling out what they perceive as performative inclusivity.
Fans question why Indian talent was overlooked again
Many online comments have shared similar frustrations: that casting a brown-skinned actor is not the same as casting someone of Indian origin. “They just picked someone who looks brown and called it a day,” one Redditor commented. Another added, “Parvati is not just a name, it’s a direct reference to Hindu culture. It deserved more thought.”
This is not the first controversy to hit the reboot. Earlier announcements like casting Paapa Essiedu as Snape and Arabella Stanton as Hermione also drew criticism from those who felt the series was playing fast and loose with established character identities. Supporters of accurate representation argue that while the intent may be diversity, the execution often feels tokenistic.
— (@)
Adding fuel to the fire is the casting history of the original films, where British-Bangladeshi actors Shefali Chowdhury and Afshan Azad played the Patil twins after being discovered through grassroots-level auditions. That sense of grounded authenticity, fans argue, is missing in the current reboot.
HBO's broader casting choices also under scrutiny
Alongside Leoni, HBO announced several other cast members: Katherine Parkinson as Molly Weasley, Lox Pratt as Draco Malfoy, Johnny Flynn as Lucius Malfoy, Leo Earley as Seamus Finnigan, Sienna Moosah as Lavender Brown, Bel Powley and Daniel Rigby as the Dursleys, and Bertie Carvel as Cornelius Fudge.
— (@)
The series, hoped to be a faithful adaptation of J.K. Rowling’s books, is scheduled to premiere in 2026. But with these early casting calls, many longtime fans feel HBO is missing the mark on cultural nuance—and all this before a single spell has been cast on screen.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
The tense deliberations in Harvey Weinstein’s New York sex crimes retrial have descended into open conflict. Jurors are reportedly attacking each other, pressuring hold-outs, and improperly considering the disgraced movie mogul’s notorious past, information explicitly banned from their discussions. This internal strife forced the jury foreperson to urgently alert the judge on Monday morning about a “situation which isn’t very good”, casting serious doubt on their ability to reach a fair verdict.
Infighting and forbidden arguments taint deliberations
According to a court transcript, the foreperson painted a grim picture for Judge Curtis Farber. Jurors are “not on the same page”, with some actively “attacking” others in a bid to change minds. Crucially, they are “pushing people” by bringing up Weinstein’s public history, details not presented as evidence during this specific trial.
As per reports, Jurors are in a heated debate during Weinstein retrial deliberationsGetty Images
This is similar to the earlier “playground stuff” reported last week, where one young juror felt unfairly “shunned” and questioned the fairness of the process, though the judge kept him on the panel. The jury itself signalled deep divisions, requesting a reread of “reasonable doubt” rules and guidance on “avoiding a hung jury”.
Mistrial denied, but jury reminded “Stick to the evidence”
Weinstein’s lawyers, citing a “tainted” and “runaway jury”, immediately seized on the turmoil to demand a mistrial. Defence attorney Arthur Aidala argued jurors were “ganging up” and considering “things that were not brought into this trial”. Prosecutors countered that some past context was legally permissible. Judge Farber denied the mistrial but took swift action. He hauled the entire jury back in, sternly instructing them that deliberations must focus only on evidence presented during the retrial concerning the three specific charges, including rape and criminal sex acts involving three women. He reiterated they must disregard anything else they knew about Weinstein.
Weinstein jury divided by heated disputes over forbidden pastGetty Images
The jury ended Monday claiming they were “making progress”, even asking for coffee to fuel further talks and requesting to revisit some testimony. However, the damage from the infighting and forbidden discussions lingers.
Weinstein, 73, already serving a long sentence for a separate California rape conviction, awaits this jury’s verdict on charges stemming from allegations by a former production assistant, an aspiring actress, and a model. This retrial, ordered after his landmark 2020 New York conviction was overturned, remains a critical, though now deeply troubled, chapter in the #MeToo saga he set to fire.
Keep ReadingShow less
Charli XCX celebrates a year of Brat’s cultural takeover
It’s been a full year since Charli XCX dropped Brat, and the album’s neon-green grip on pop culture has not loosened. Forget fading summer anthems; Brat feels permanently wired into the now. How did an artist long celebrated for being ahead of the curve finally make the whole world tune in? Well, she did it entirely her own way.
Charli was no newcomer. She smashed charts a decade ago with “Fancy” and penned hits for others. Yet mainstream stardom on her own terms felt elusive until Brat. The rollout was masterful, starting with the divisive “Von Dutch”, then the It Girl-packed “360” video featuring faces like Julia Fox and Chloë Sevigny, who soon became unavoidable.
Charli XCX arrives for the 2025 Met GalaGetty Images
Crucially, she nurtured her core fans (“Angels”) with intimate pop-up shows, birthing the iconic Brat Wall, where teasers about collaborations and the deluxe album kept excitement boiling. When Brat landed, hitting No. 3 in the US and No. 2 in the UK, it was a moment of absolute cultural takeover.
Beyond the music: building a movement
Brat’s fire spread far beyond the songs. A simple tweet : “Kamala IS brat”, saw the US Vice President’s campaign adopt the album’s aesthetic overnight, sparking global chatter. Charli directly addressed fan speculation, confirming “Girl, So Confusing” was about Lorde, then brilliantly working it out with her on a remix weeks later. She refused to let the moment die, dropping a full remix album (Brat and It’s the Same but There’s Three More Songs so It’s Not), featuring everyone from Billie Eilish to underground stars, which pushed Brat to UK No. 1.
Charli XCX performing on stage Getty Images
The Sweat and Brat tours became must-see events, packed with surprise guests. Grammy wins followed, plus SNL, Coachella and film cameos. Even her older song “Party 4 U” surged up the charts years later. Charli questioned at Coachella: “Does this mean brat summer is finally over?” The answer seems clear. Brat wasn’t just a seasonal hit. It was almost like Charli XCX meticulously crafting a phenomenon, proving that staying fiercely true to her vision was the ultimate key to connect with a wide audience.
Keep ReadingShow less
Glastonbury 2025 welcomes smaller crowds for improved safety
Glastonbury has taken the unprecedented step of selling thousands fewer tickets for its 2025 event following dangerous overcrowding last year. Festival chief Emily Eavis confirmed the capacity reduction just weeks before Olivia Rodrigo, The 1975 and Neil Young headline the iconic event. The move addresses 2024’s critical incidents, where crowd crushes forced performances to halt and areas to close. “We’ve sold a few thousand fewer tickets to see how that affects site dynamics,” Eavis stated on the Sidetracked podcast.
In its most dramatic transformation, the festival’s legendary nightlife zone Shangri-La will become a tree filled sanctuary, abandoning its industrial aesthetic entirely. “It’s completely the opposite of anything we’ve done,” Eavis revealed. Simultaneously, newly acquired land has created Dragon’s Tail, a public hilltop area overlooking the southeast corner. The dual strategy is to disperse crowds after last year’s chaos, when fans missed sets like Sugababes and Charli XCX due to unsafe congestion.
A secret Pyramid Stage booking named “Patchwork”, which required a year of complex logistics, fuels intense speculation alongside major acts. The line-up also features Rod Stewart’s coveted legends slot, Irish rap trio Kneecap and breakout star Raye. Demand remains high despite reduced capacity: November’s first ticket batch sold out in 30 minutes, with coach packages disappearing even faster. “There were years we couldn’t give tickets away,” Eavis reflected, contrasting the current frenzy with past struggles.
Organisers now leverage crowd data from the festival app’s schedule planner, which accurately predicted 2024 pinch points. Post-pandemic movement patterns show attendees move more in a herd, prompting new traffic management including 10 alternative routes across the sprawling site.
The festival runs from 25 to 30 June with additional measures like expanded space at the Other Stage, where Charli XCX’s Saturday headline set is expected to test the new systems. While operating below its capacity of 210,000, Glastonbury maintains its non-corporate ethos despite £10 million (₹1,025,000,000) pandemic losses. “The whole thing is based on goodwill,” Eavis emphasised, rejecting commercial takeovers. Final preparations include £1 million (₹102,500,000) wet weather contingencies, ensuring the show proceeds rain or shine.
Keep ReadingShow less
Shah Rukh Khan and Salman Khan’s Tiger vs Pathaan is on hold as YRF rethinks its spy universe strategy
Fans hoping to see Bollywood's biggest stars, Shah Rukh Khan and Salman Khan, face off in Tiger vs Pathaan will need to wait a little longer. Despite rumours of the project being shelved, sources confirm the film is still happening, just not anytime soon. Yash Raj Films (YRF) has decided to take a step back and rethink its approach to the spy universe before moving forward with this blockbuster clash.
A creative refresh for the spy universe
Aditya Chopra, YRF's chief architect, isn’t satisfied with sticking to the same old formula. Insiders reveal that the studio wants to avoid predictability and is working on a fresh narrative direction for Tiger vs Pathaan. "The team wants this film to be a game-changer, not just another spy flick," a source said. "They’re reworking the script to make sure it delivers something truly special."
YRF delays Tiger vs Pathaan to focus on War 2 and Alpha before revisiting the Khan vs Khan showdownPinterest
Earlier this year, Salman Khan hinted at the delay, stating that the film "isn’t happening right now." However, this doesn’t mean the project is dead, just that YRF is taking its time to perfect the vision. The studio is currently prioritising other big releases, including War 2 starring Hrithik Roshan and Jr NTR and Alpha featuring Alia Bhatt and Sharvari Wagh, before revisiting the Khan vs Khan spectacle.
What’s next for fans?
While Tiger vs Pathaan remains on hold, YRF’s spy universe is far from dormant. War 2 is set to hit cinemas in 2025, followed by Alpha later that year. Meanwhile, Dhoom 4, starring Ranbir Kapoor, is also in development, signalling that YRF is expanding its action-packed universe beyond just spy thrillers.
After Pathaan shattered box office records and Tiger 3 underperformed, the stakes for this crossover are higher than ever. The studio wants to ensure that when the two superstars finally collide on screen, it’s nothing short of legendary.
For now, the dream remains alive; just postponed. And if YRF’s track record is any indication, the wait will likely be worth it.