Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Racist comment: £50,000 fine for Essex

Racist comment: £50,000 fine for Essex

ESSEX have been fined £50,000 by an independent Cricket Discipline Commission panel after the English county club pleaded guilty to two charges in relation to a racist comment made at a board meeting in 2017.

Essex chairman John Faragher resigned from his role in November 2021 after the allegation that he used racist language, although he strongly denied the incident. Read full story


The England & Wales Cricket Board (ECB), which announced the decision on Thursday, said Essex had also been cautioned about further conduct and issued with a reprimand. It added that £15,000 of the fine was suspended for two years.

"The charge was in two parts -- relating to the comment made at the meeting, and the subsequent failure by Essex CCC to conduct an appropriate, or any, subsequent investigation," a statement by the ECB said.

Faragher's decision to quit Essex came a day after fellow county side Yorkshire's former chief executive Mark Arthur resigned in the fallout from the allegations of institutional racism made by their former player Azeem Rafiq.

(Reuters)

More For You

Google is the third tech giant to sign a Pentagon deal. Is big tech normalising AI for defence?

Google proceeded with the deal despite 950 employees signing an open letter urging safeguards like Anthropic’s

Getty Images

Google is the third tech giant to sign a Pentagon deal. Is big tech normalising AI for defence?

Highlights

  • Google becomes third AI firm to sign Pentagon deal.
  • 950 Google employees sign letter opposing unrestricted military AI use.
  • Pentagon labelled Anthropic a supply-chain risk after it refused terms.
Google has given the US Department of Defense access to its AI for classified networks, allowing all lawful uses. This makes Google the third major AI company to sign a Pentagon deal, after Anthropic refused similar terms.

Anthropic took a public stand against the Trump administration by refusing to give the Department of Defense unlimited access to its AI.

The company wanted safeguards to stop its AI being used for domestic mass surveillance and autonomous weapons. The Pentagon did not accept those conditions.

Keep ReadingShow less