Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘Former Hertfordshire police officer made racist slurs against Asians'

He directed a comment at an Asian police sergeant to suggest they had been recruited after 9/11

‘Former Hertfordshire police officer made racist slurs against Asians'

A former Hertfordshire officer resigned before his misconduct ruling

A FORMER Hertfordshire police officer made racist comments to colleagues on multiple occasions, a misconduct panel has found.

PC Oliver Gobey, who resigned as an officer on the morning of the misconduct hearing, directed racist comments at people of Asian descent on two separate occasions.


In the first incident, he directed a “racially motivated” comment at a police sergeant to suggest they had been recruited after 9/11 because they were Asian.

Gobey was immediately challenged by PC Wallace, an “experienced officer” who had been a tutor constable for twenty years.

In a second incident, Gobey was in a police vehicle in Hitchin town centre with three colleagues. A man of Asian descent and his friends approached the officers and spoke to Wallace. The man said he was from Birmingham and asked for recommendations on places to visit.

After the man had walked away, Gobey said: “Or you have come down here to escape the honour-based violence you have caused.”Gobey was again challenged by Wallace. Gobey denied making the racist comments, but the panel concluded on the balance of probabilities that both incidents had taken place.

The panel’s report said: “They were discriminatory comments and they were his own. They were unprovoked. No one encouraged him.”

The panel also concluded that Gobey “chose to lie” about a business interest. He repeatedly failed to submit a proper application to continue part-time work for a private ambulance service and voluntary work for St John Ambulance, but continued with the latter regardless.

He also told a supervisor his business interest application had been successful, when it had not been.

In a fourth incident, Gobey “deliberately typed in random numbers” when assigned to work in the Resource Management Unit (RMU).

His figures, which were found to be wrong, came after Gobey “gave the impression to his colleagues that the work in RMY was ‘beneath’ him”.

While working there, he was heard “swearing about the work”. He was “short-tempered and ‘snappy’.” The panel’s report said: “The compilation of the figures … were far from being a simple administrative matter.

“It was essential operational information required by senior officers to decide how scarce resources would be deployed in the coming days.”

The panel found all the allegations against Gobey to be proven on the balance of probabilities, and concluded that they amounted to “serious gross misconduct” that would have led to him being sacked without notice if he had not resigned. He has also been added to the College of Policing barred list.

(Local Democracy Reporting Service)

More For You

Starmer calls lack of disclosure over Mandelson vetting ‘frankly staggering’

Starmer said on three occasions that “full due process” was followed in Mandelson’s appointment

Getty Images

Starmer calls lack of disclosure over Mandelson vetting ‘frankly staggering’

Highlights

  • Starmer accepts he unknowingly misled MPs over Mandelson's failed security checks.
  • Foreign Office overruled vetting recommendation and kept Starmer in the dark.
  • Top civil servant Sir Olly Robbins sacked and set to face MPs on Tuesday.
Keir Starmer has said it is “frankly staggering” that ministers were not informed about the failed security vetting of Peter Mandelson, insisting he does not accept that senior figures could have been kept in the dark at multiple stages of the process.
He said he should have been told before Mandelson took up the Washington post, that the cabinet secretary should have been informed during a 2025 review, and that the foreign secretary should have known when addressing a select committee.
Downing Street has insisted the prime minister would never knowingly mislead parliament and that he was himself misled by the Foreign Office.
His official spokesperson said the information about Mandelson's failed vetting should have been provided to parliament, to Starmer and to other government ministers, but was not.

Starmer had told the Commons on three separate occasions that "full due process" was followed when Mandelson was appointed US ambassador.

That position has now unravelled following revelations that United Kingdom Security Vetting recommended against Mandelson's security clearance before he took up the Washington post.

Keep ReadingShow less