Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Starmer calls lack of disclosure over Mandelson vetting ‘frankly staggering’

Prime minister faces Commons showdown as vetting scandal deepens

Starmer Mandelson vetting

Starmer said on three occasions that “full due process” was followed in Mandelson’s appointment

Getty Images

Highlights

  • Starmer accepts he unknowingly misled MPs over Mandelson's failed security checks.
  • Foreign Office overruled vetting recommendation and kept Starmer in the dark.
  • Top civil servant Sir Olly Robbins sacked and set to face MPs on Tuesday.
Keir Starmer has said it is “frankly staggering” that ministers were not informed about the failed security vetting of Peter Mandelson, insisting he does not accept that senior figures could have been kept in the dark at multiple stages of the process.
He said he should have been told before Mandelson took up the Washington post, that the cabinet secretary should have been informed during a 2025 review, and that the foreign secretary should have known when addressing a select committee.
Downing Street has insisted the prime minister would never knowingly mislead parliament and that he was himself misled by the Foreign Office.
His official spokesperson said the information about Mandelson's failed vetting should have been provided to parliament, to Starmer and to other government ministers, but was not.

Starmer had told the Commons on three separate occasions that "full due process" was followed when Mandelson was appointed US ambassador.

That position has now unravelled following revelations that United Kingdom Security Vetting recommended against Mandelson's security clearance before he took up the Washington post.


Downing Street has said Starmer would not have appointed Mandelson had he been made aware of that recommendation.

The admission has been met with shock across Westminster, given the sensitivity of the Washington ambassador role.

Questions mount Up

The Foreign Office took the rare step of overruling the official vetting recommendation, allowing Mandelson to be appointed regardless.

Documents released by the Cabinet Office show that then-cabinet secretary Lord Simon Case appeared to advise Starmer to complete security vetting before announcing any appointment. That advice was not followed.

Mandelson was announced for the Washington role in December last year, with vetting only taking place afterwards.

The documents also show Mandelson was offered access to higher-tier briefings before his vetting was finalised.

Starmer said he would make it "crystal clear" to MPs that he had been left in the dark and described the Foreign Office's failure to inform him as "unforgivable."

He instructed officials to urgently establish the full facts when he was finally told about the vetting decision last Tuesday.

Downing Street and the Cabinet Office said they had asked the Foreign Office "repeated questions" to be assured the proper process had been followed during the appointment, though No 10 did not explain why those questions were asked or whether they stemmed from existing concerns.

The row has already cost Olly Robbins his job. The most senior civil servant at the Foreign Office was effectively dismissed last week, with critics accusing Starmer of throwing him "under the bus."

Robbins is taking legal advice and is due to appear before the Foreign Affairs Committee on Tuesday, a moment No 10 will be watching closely.

Downing Street has pushed back against suggestions from Robbins's allies that he was legally prevented from telling ministers about the vetting failure, arguing there is a clear difference between being involved in a decision and simply being informed of it.

Opposition leader Kemi Badenoch and Reform UK's Nigel Farage have both called on Starmer to resign.

More For You

Indian man left without UK status after wife and daughter died in Air India crash

Among the 260 dead were 169 Indian nationals, 53 British citizens, and one Canadian, including Sadikabanu and her daughter

Getty Images

Indian man left without UK status after wife and daughter died in Air India crash

Highlights

  • Air India Flight 171 crash in June 2025 killed 260 people, including Mohammad Shethwala’s wife and child.
  • Home Office rejected his humanitarian visa, saying no exceptional circumstances.
  • Critics condemned the decision, comparing it to the Windrush scandal.
Mohammad Shethwala came to the UK from India in March 2022 as a dependent on his wife Sadikabanu's student visa, while she pursued her studies at Ulster University's London campus.
The couple settled in the capital, and their daughter Fatima was born in Britain. Life was moving forward.
Sadikabanu had recently started a new job in Rugby and was preparing to apply for a Skilled Worker visa, a step that would have secured the family's future in the UK from 2026 onwards.

That future ended on 12 June 2025. The Ahmedabad-to-London Air India flight went down seconds after take-off, killing all 241 passengers and crew on board, as well as 19 people on the ground after the aircraft struck a medical college hostel building and caught fire.

Among the 260 dead were 169 Indian nationals, 53 British citizens and one Canadian. Sadikabanu and two-year-old Fatima were both on that flight.

Keep ReadingShow less