Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Government announces disability benefit cuts, aims to save £5bn

Work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall told parliament on Tuesday that the changes were part of a "significant reform package" intended to help disabled people enter the workforce.

Starmer

Before the announcement, Starmer said the government could not avoid making difficult decisions and that the current benefits system was not sustainable.

Getty Images

THE GOVERNMENT has announced cuts to disability welfare payments, aiming to save over £5 billion by 2030. The decision comes as the country faces economic challenges, with slow growth and rising public spending.

Work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall told parliament on Tuesday that the changes were part of a "significant reform package" intended to help disabled people enter the workforce.


Labour, which has historically been criticised by the right for high spending on benefits, argues that the cuts are necessary to address a £22 billion budget shortfall it says it inherited from the previous Conservative government.

Kendall’s announcement was made ahead of chancellor Rachel Reeves’s Spring Statement on 26 March, where further spending cuts across various government departments are expected to be outlined.

Rising benefit costs

Kendall stated that UK spending on benefits had continued to rise since the pandemic, unlike in comparable countries where it had stabilised or declined.

Before the announcement, prime minister Keir Starmer said the government could not avoid making difficult decisions and that the current benefits system was not sustainable. "The government could not put off difficult decisions," he said, adding that the existing system was "not defensible in moral or economic terms."

He pointed out that one in 10 working-age people were claiming at least one type of health or disability benefit. Starmer’s spokesman also noted a significant increase in applicants citing anxiety and depression as their primary condition.

The reform focuses on reducing eligibility for the Personal Independence Payment (PIP), a benefit designed to support disabled individuals. PIP is not means-tested and is available to those in employment.

Official data released on Tuesday showed that 3.66 million people in England and Wales were receiving PIP at the end of January, a 71 per cent increase from pre-pandemic levels.

"Every day, there are more than 1,000 new PIP awards," Kendall told MPs. "That is not sustainable long term," she added.

According to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), spending on health and disability benefits for working-age adults is projected to rise from £48.5 billion in 2023/24 to £75.7 billion in 2029/30.

The OBR also reported that the UK spent £296.3 billion on welfare in 2023/24, with almost half allocated to pensions.

This spending accounted for nearly 11 per cent of the UK’s gross domestic product (GDP).

Reactions to the cuts

Labour MP Clive Lewis criticised the government’s approach to disability benefits, calling it contradictory.

"On the one hand, it's trying to fix our broken welfare system and at the same time save money. This is not possible," Lewis told AFP before Kendall’s statement. "And it is doubly impossible if we are to adhere to the Labour values people elected this government to pursue."

The announcement comes as the government recently committed to increased defence spending, adding further pressure on public finances.

Meanwhile, official data released last week showed that the UK economy unexpectedly contracted in January, raising concerns ahead of the upcoming Spring Statement.

Global economic uncertainty, including the impact of tariffs imposed by former US president Donald Trump, has also contributed to financial pressures.

(With inputs from AFP)

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Tackling hostility against Muslims matters for everyone

Anti immigration protesters attend the 'Glasgow Reclaims The Streets From Far-right Hatred And Violence' anti-racism protest on June 13, 2026 in Glasgow, Scotland.

Getty Images

Tackling hostility against Muslims matters for everyone

Sunder Katwala

Born in the mid-1970s I felt part of a lucky generation, which gained from pushing back the overt racism of that era. When we talk about stronger “social norms”, what we mean is that few people thought that monkey chants at the football or racist jokes on the telly were normal anymore – while more had Asian and black colleagues, neighbours and friends.

That past progress is put to the test today. A terrible crime in Belfast saw organised efforts at indiscriminate racist attacks on migrants and ethnic minorities, whose only connection to the crime was the colour of their skin. Those seeking to make racism fashionable again have the online megaphone of the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, on their side.

Past progress could be experienced unevenly, too. Being of mixed Indian and Irish Catholic parentage, I saw both identities rise in status once the BBC comedy Goodness Gracious Me inverted who could tell the jokes, and peace broke out in Northern Ireland. Yet, British Muslims of my generation felt under more intense scrutiny after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Efforts to tackle anti-Muslim hatred risked being stalled by arguments over what to call it and how to define it. The government’s new definition of anti-Muslim hostility seeks to transcend the confusion that the term “Islamophobia” could generate. But the challenge is not just to define the prejudice – but to find effective ways to shrink it.

There are sobering findings on the starting points in new research from British Future and the British Muslim Trust. More than half of British Muslims report experiencing prejudice based on their religion last year – a quarter in person and over a third online. A third of the public hold mostly negative views. One in six endorse sweeping and often indiscriminate hostility. Anti-Muslim hostility can have about twice the social reach as prejudice against other faith or ethnic minorities.

Tackling this hostility cannot be the responsibility of Muslims alone. It will take a whole-of-society effort. After all, this is foundationally about the attitudes towards a six per cent minority group, held among the 94 per cent of us who are not Muslim.

Keep ReadingShow less