Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

‘Piers Morgan ruling is why Ofcom needs to go’

‘Piers Morgan ruling is why Ofcom needs to go’

WHEN I saw her lying in the hospital bed, my heart broke. Again. It was the seventh time in her 30 years she had tried to take her life.

Once again, I did not know why. Once again, I was woken up by a frantic, drunken, late-night phone call from her husband. Once again, I was left to clear up the mess. Decades on, long after they have both passed, the memories still haunt me.


South Asians are not good at speaking about trauma, mental health issues, or in fact anything that, quite wrongly, is considered to “bring shame on the community”. We hide it away and never speak about it.

And that is why I was, and remain, so angry with that imbecile, Piers Morgan. Here is a privileged white man. The privilege to know that, like former US president Donald Trump once did, when he tweets or opens his mouth, the nation acts on his awful, basest thoughts.

When Morgan implied that Meghan Markle was a liar for telling US chat show host Oprah Winfrey that, at times, she had suicidal thoughts; when Morgan called mental health issues “the go-to excuse for any poor performance in elite sport”, a joke about a tennis player who happened to be black; but when he never called out Ben Stokes, the white cricketer, for seeking a mental health break; that made me, well, yes, incensed.

I fell into his trap because that’s exactly what this rabble-rouser wants. He wants to evoke the most basic emotions so he can get off being talked about. It excites him. He relishes the controversy and indignant debate he leaves in his destructive wake.

Barnie 12 Barnie Choudhury

A politician once repeated Oscar Wilde’s line to me – what’s worse than being talked about is not being talked about. And there you have Morgan.

But here’s what I can’t fathom – what on earth was Ofcom, the broadcast regulator, thinking in backing this emotional neanderthal?

New readers start here. Morgan spouts his nonsense while hosting ITV’s Good Morning Britain. More than 50,000 viewers complain to Ofcom.

Morgan’s co-presenter Susanna Reid, rightly, admonishes him. He flounces off the set after being, rightly again, tackled by his colleague Alex Beresford. ITV sacks him or Morgan quits. Ensue a national debate.

Ofcom should have ended that discussion this week with its ruling, but it didn’t. I have always defended the right to offend, but when you question someone's thoughts, especially when someone is vulnerable, you have crossed a line.

Here’s my logic. Let’s say, hypothetically, I’m an unknown BBC local radio presenter, and I’m discussing with my colleagues the topic of the day, mental illness. I get a call from someone I’ve met once – let’s call her Mrs M. She says she’s contemplating suicide, and I say, “I don’t believe you, you’re seeking attention.”

My co-presenter points out I’m uncaring and unsympathetic. Listeners complain to Ofcom. My boss decides to sack me. What do you think Ofcom would do to a little known brown journalist from a little-listened-to radio station?

So, here’s the question: why did Ofcom make Morgan’s incendiary comments a battle between “harm and offence” and “freedom of expression”?

Here’s why I ask. What if my unfiltered hatred of anyone with a mental illness – because there is no such thing, they are weak, it’s God’s way of weeding out feeble people, and it fits the Darwinian theory of natural selection – leads to Mrs M taking her life?

Would Ofcom say, ‘We thought long and hard, but we find Asian Smashy-Nicey not guilty. It was a fine judgement call. His co-presenter immediately tapped him on the wrist. But if we ruled against Smashy-Nicey, we would have set a dangerous precedent and killed his right to freedom of expression?’ Um. No. The all-white Ofcom panel members would, quite rightly, throw the book at me, and fine the radio station.

This ruling shows why Ofcom is not fit for purpose. It can shut down a Chinese-owned TV station for breaching “freedom of expression rights”, but it can't sanction a privileged, infamous, white man.

By the way, in the scenario above, it was never about my hiding behind Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights, freedom of expression. It was about whether I caused harm and offence. I’m bang to rights. I have breached section 2.

Although implicit, freedom of expression is a legal right, not a regulatory one. Ofcom is right to defend it. But it should not use it as a crutch for flawed decision-making.

Now then, is there any broadcaster out there who wants a brown boy unafraid to use the N-word, P-word or C-word to generate great publicity? Look no further. Contact my agent Ivor Nomorales, because I can get away with abusive language, ’cos I know my freedom of expression rights, innit?

Thanks, Ofcom mate.

Barnie Choudhury served as a non-executive director for Ofcom during 2012-2017

More For You

“Why can’t I just run?”: A south Asian woman’s harrowing harassment story

Minreet with her mother

“Why can’t I just run?”: A south Asian woman’s harrowing harassment story

I was five years old when my parents first signed me up for a mini marathon. They were both keen runners and wanted me to follow in their footsteps. At the time, I hated it. Running felt like punishment — exhausting, uncomfortable, and something I never imagined I’d do by choice.

But one moment changed everything. I was 12, attending a gymnastics competition, and had gone to the car alone to grab my hula hoop. As I walked back, a group of men started shouting at me. They moved closer. I didn’t wait to hear what they had to say — I ran. Fast. My heart was pounding. It was the first time I felt afraid simply for existing in public as a young girl. I never told anyone. But I remember feeling thankful, strangely, that my parents had taught me how to run.

Keep ReadingShow less
Sri Aurobindo

Heehs’s biography is grounded in extensive archival research across France, England, India and Israel

AMG

Sri Aurobindo and the rise of the Asian century

Dinesh Sharma

My friend and colleague, the American historian Peter Heehs, who has lived in Pondicherry, India, for decades, recently published a compelling new biography, The Mother: A Life of Sri Aurobindo’s Collaborator (2025). Heehs previously authored The Lives of Sri Aurobindo (2008), which remains one of the most balanced and scholarly accounts of Aurobindo’s life.

According to Heehs, most previous biographies of the Mother were written for devotees and relied on secondary sources, often presenting her as a divine incarnation without critical engagement. “Such biographies are fine for those who see the Mother as a divine being,” Heehs said, “but they can be off-putting for readers who simply want to understand her life – as an artist, writer, spiritual teacher, and founder of the Ashram and Auroville.”

Keep ReadingShow less
INSET Hatul Shah Sigma conference chair

Hatul Shah

Showing up with purpose: Lessons in leadership and legacy

Hatul Shah

Last week, I had the privilege of speaking at the Circles of Connections event hosted by the Society of Jainism and Entrepreneurship at Imperial College London. The event was organised by Yash Shah and Hrutika S., and generously sponsored by Koolesh Shah and the London Town Group, with support from Nikhil Shah, Priyanka Mehta, and Ambika Mehta.

The experience reminded me that leadership isn’t just about vision or results — it’s about how you show up, and why you do what you do.

Keep ReadingShow less
Aspirations ignited following Leicester schools Parliament visit

Aspirations ignited following Leicester schools Parliament visit

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE DL

Delighted to pause and look back on a pioneering partnership project, which saw our Randal Charitable Foundation, Leicestershire Police and the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) support pupils, from 5 Leicester schools, tour London and the Houses of Parliament with the aim to help raise aspirations and demonstrate possible future career paths.

With more young people than ever struggling to stay in education, find employment and track down career opportunities, I’ve reflected on the importance of collaborations like this one, which model just one way in that small interventions could reap rewards in the life course of youngsters.

Keep ReadingShow less
Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less