Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Panel member backs racism findings towards cricketer Rafiq as ‘banter’

Panel member backs racism findings towards cricketer Rafiq as ‘banter’

A British Asian member of the panel has stood by its findings after Azeem Rafiq was called a P**I by former England batter, Gary Ballance.

In a investigation, the panel ruled it as ‘banter’ despite them being condemned but Boris Johnson and other members of the cabinet.


Mesba Ahmed, a vice-chairman of the National Asian Cricket Council said that he and his colleagues had done “as good a job as we possibly could have done” before reaching their conclusions.

The expert told the Telegraph Sport in an exclusive interview that the race row could be “solved” if the full report into it was finally published.

He did not deny that those conclusions included that they did not accept Rafiq was offended by the racist term, despite being left in tears, because it had been said as “banter between friends”.

Ahmed also did not dispute the panel found Rafiq himself guilty of using “offensive, racially derogatory comments” when referring to Zimbabwean-born Ballance as “Zimbo from Zimbabwe” and that, were he still at the club, he should face disciplinary action.

Yorkshire County Cricket Club members have also expressed their 'frustration' at the handling of the racism scandal.

Graeme Greenfield, the chair of the club’s members’ committee said “We, as a members’ committee, will be raising our concerns to the board at the manner in which the whole process has been dealt with.

“The process has been handled, particularly from a PR point of view, not very well at all and the club has been on the back foot from the word go, not really getting on the front foot at any point in proceedings.”

He added: “The Yorkshire members are not happy and they’re frustrated. It’s gone on too long and it needs sorting out.”

Ahmed, who is of Bangladeshi heritage, said: “If you’re Irish and I’m Scottish or you’re English and I’m Scottish and you have banter and you’re all mates and you hang around and you do things yourselves and we call each other names and we go along with it and you’re happy with it, I’m happy with it, what do you call that? You can judge it yourself.

“If you call me, ‘You Irish so-and-so’, and I call you, ‘You English so-and-so’, and we’re having banter, we’re mates, we’re having a laugh – whatever – we’re playing golf together and we’re having a laugh, you guys will have to judge that yourself.”

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

How to Combine Multiple Timeframes for Better Trade Analysis
iStock

How to Combine Multiple Timeframes for Better Trade Analysis

A chart can tell very different stories depending on how far you zoom in. On a five-minute view, a currency pair may look like it's collapsing. On the daily view, the same move might be a small pullback inside a strong uptrend. Traders who look at only one timeframe often get caught between those two truths. Whether you follow live forex charts on a phone during a commute or across several monitors at a desk, combining timeframes gives you context, which is often the missing piece behind poor entries and early exits. This guide explains how to do it in a clear, repeatable way.

Why One Timeframe Is Rarely Enough

Every timeframe shows a different layer of market behaviour. Longer ones reveal the dominant trend and major support and resistance zones. Shorter ones reveal timing, momentum, and entry detail. Using only the short view makes you reactive to noise. Using only the long view leaves your entries imprecise and your stops wide. Multi-timeframe analysis solves both problems by letting the bigger picture set direction while the smaller picture sets timing.

Keep ReadingShow less