Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Ofcom fines porn firm £1.35 million and orders stronger age verification on adult websites

The media regulator issues its largest fine under the Online Safety Act after the company failed to introduce highly effective age checks on its websites for months

Ofcom fines porn firm £1.35 million and orders stronger age verification on adult websites

Ofcom began investigating the firm within days of age verification rules taking effect in July 2025

iStock

Highlights

  • Ofcom has fined 8579 LLC £1.35 million for failing to implement age verification measures on its porn websites.
  • The company faces an additional £1,000 daily penalty if it fails to comply with remaining requirements by Monday.
  • The fine is Ofcom's largest under the Online Safety Act since age verification rules took effect in July 2025.
Ofcom has fined porn company 8579 LLC £1.35 m for failing to introduce proper age verification measures on its websites, marking the regulator's largest fine under the Online Safety Act to date.
The media regulator found that the company's sites did not have "highly effective" methods to check that UK visitors were over 18, leaving children potentially exposed to adult content.
A further £50,000 fine was issued for the company's failure to respond to Ofcom's information requests.

Ofcom began investigating the firm within days of age verification rules taking effect in July 2025. According to the regulator, 8579 LLC failed to implement highly effective age checks on most of its porn sites between 25 July and at least 19 November 2025.

The company must now implement robust age verification on one remaining site before 17:00 GMT on Monday or face an additional £1,000 daily penalty.


It also risks a further £250 daily fine if it fails to provide Ofcom with a complete list of all sites it operates.

Regulator takes action

George Lusty, director of enforcement at Ofcom, told the BBC that the regulator had "been clear" that adult sites needed to deploy robust age checks to protect children from seeing pornography.

"Those that fail to do this or ignore legally binding requests from us should expect to face fines," he added.

In December, Ofcom fined porn company AVS Group Ltd £1 m for continued non-compliance with the Online Safety Act, after which AVS rolled out age checks on some of its sites.

Wider industry impact

The fines come amid wider industry turbulence. On 2 February, Pornhub began restricting access to its website in the UK.

Its parent company Aylo said the Online Safety Act had "not achieved its goal of protecting minors," adding that the law had "diverted traffic to darker, unregulated corners of the internet."

The Online Safety Act is a set of laws and duties online platforms must follow, enforced by Ofcom.

Under its Children's Codes, platforms must also prevent young people from encountering harmful content relating to suicide, self-harm, eating disorders and pornography.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Graham Norton’s Meta victory could be a turning point for victims of deepfake misinformation

The ruling is likely to be watched closely by lawyers, campaigners and victims of online harassment

Getty Images

Graham Norton’s Meta victory could be a turning point for victims of deepfake misinformation

Highlights

  • Graham Norton has won a US court order requiring Meta to reveal information about an anonymous Facebook account.
  • The broadcaster says the page spread deepfake content and false claims about his health, family and views.
  • The case highlights the growing challenge posed by AI-generated misinformation.
  • The ruling could offer hope to others struggling to identify those behind harmful online content.

Graham Norton's legal victory against Meta is attracting attention beyond the entertainment world. The broadcaster successfully obtained a court order in California requiring the social media giant to disclose information that could identify the operator of an anonymous Facebook page accused of spreading false claims and deepfake content about him.

According to court filings, the account published fabricated stories about Norton's health, his husband and even falsely claimed that his mother had died. While the case centres on a high-profile television personality, its wider significance lies in what it could mean for others facing similar online attacks.

Keep ReadingShow less