Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Starmer: I would not have appointed Mandelson if aware of Epstein ties

The prime minister is facing questions over his judgement, including from Labour MPs, after initially standing by Mandelson before removing him from the post.

Starmer

Starmer, who has faced negative coverage since taking office in July 2024, defended the appointment process.

Reuters

PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer said on Monday he would not have appointed Peter Mandelson as UK ambassador to Washington had he known the extent of his links with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

This was Starmer’s first public statement since dismissing Mandelson last week. The prime minister is facing questions over his judgement, including from Labour MPs, after initially standing by Mandelson before removing him from the post.


Starmer, who has faced negative coverage since taking office in July 2024, defended the appointment process. He said Mandelson had been properly vetted at the time.

"Had I known then what I know now, I'd have never appointed him," Starmer told broadcasters.

Mandelson was dismissed after emails showed he had urged Epstein to "fight for early release" shortly before Epstein was sentenced in 2008 to 18 months in prison for procuring a child for prostitution.

Some Labour MPs have questioned why Mandelson was chosen despite his long-standing friendship with Epstein, which continued after the conviction.

The government also faced scrutiny over why Starmer expressed "confidence" in Mandelson last week, when Mandelson had already admitted that "very embarrassing" messages were about to become public.

The dismissal followed the resignation of Angela Rayner as deputy prime minister less than a week earlier, after she admitted underpaying property tax.

Both departures came soon after Starmer relaunched his government in an attempt to recover ground from Reform UK, the party led by Nigel Farage that has been leading national opinion polls for months. The next general election is not expected until 2029.

Labour MP Helen Hayes told BBC radio that questions about "the nature of the leadership" would arise if Labour performs badly in the May 2026 local elections.

Another Labour MP, Graham Stringer, told Times Radio that Starmer is "supping in the last-chance saloon," and that many in the party think he is "making mistakes and doing poorly at the job."

Asked on Channel 4 News whether he would resign if the party believed it was necessary, Starmer replied: "No, because I'm absolutely clear what the task is in front of me."

"We have a crossroads, really, in terms of the future of this country. We go forward with Labour for national renewal, a patriotic call about this country and taking this country forward, true patriotism, or we have division and decline under Reform," he said.

On Monday, the government faced another setback when senior aide Paul Ovenden resigned after comments he made in 2017 about Diane Abbott, Britain’s first black woman MP, resurfaced.

(With inputs from agencies)

More For You

Starmer

Starmer criticises Trump and Putin as UK energy bills track global tensions

Getty Images

Starmer criticises Trump and Putin as UK energy bills track global tensions

  • Starmer says UK families are paying the price for global political decisions.
  • Energy price swings linked to Middle East conflict and oil volatility.
  • Tensions rise between UK and US amid wider geopolitical disagreements.

The sharp swings in UK energy bills are now becoming a political flashpoint, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer openly blaming global leaders for the pressure on households. Speaking amid ongoing volatility in oil markets, Starmer said he was “fed up” with how international conflicts are feeding directly into rising costs for British families and businesses.

Oil prices have been fluctuating following the US-Israeli war with Iran and a fragile ceasefire, and that instability is filtering through to energy costs across the UK. Against this backdrop, Starmer pointed the finger at Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, suggesting their actions are driving uncertainty that ordinary people end up paying for.

Keep ReadingShow less